Patients with DCIS Seen at a Specialized High-Risk Breast Clinic Run by Surgical Advanced Practice Providers Have High Rates of Preventive Medication Uptake.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Annals of Surgical Oncology Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-15 DOI:10.1245/s10434-024-16857-7
Kathryn Paschalis, Chelsea Marin, Kendall Miller, Crystal Regis, Katie Bates, Jessica Gooch, Marilyn Ling, Jan Dombrowski, Brian Yirinec, Alissa Huston, Anna Weiss
{"title":"Patients with DCIS Seen at a Specialized High-Risk Breast Clinic Run by Surgical Advanced Practice Providers Have High Rates of Preventive Medication Uptake.","authors":"Kathryn Paschalis, Chelsea Marin, Kendall Miller, Crystal Regis, Katie Bates, Jessica Gooch, Marilyn Ling, Jan Dombrowski, Brian Yirinec, Alissa Huston, Anna Weiss","doi":"10.1245/s10434-024-16857-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preventative medication (PM) uptake is low among patients at an elevated risk of breast cancer, largely due to fears of intolerance. This study aimed to investigate whether a new, surgical advanced practice provider (APP)-run clinic was effectively prescribing PM. We hypothesized equivalent rates of PM uptake compared to consultation with medical oncologists (MD).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The APP-run clinic and accompanying database were initiated 01/2023, including patients with benign breast complaints and/or an elevated risk of invasive breast cancer. A historic single-institution surgical database and this prospective database were queried for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ between 04/2007-05/2023 and 01/2023-01/2024, respectively. Patients with invasive breast cancer within the prior 5 years were excluded. Chart review abstracted PM type/dose. Chi square analysis compared PM uptake rates and dose.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 523 patients met study criteria; the MD sample and APP sample were relatively well balanced except fewer hormone receptor positive patients in the MD sample (266/309 [86.1%] versus 202/214 [94.4%] APP, p < 0.01). PM uptake was lower in the MD sample (96/309 [31.1%] compared to the APP sample (86/214 [40.2%], p = 0.03). There was significantly more tamoxifen prescribed among the APP sample (58.2% vs. 35.6% among MD, p = 0.02), and low-dose tamoxifen prescribing increased significantly (47.3% vs. 9.8% MD, p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our surgical APP-run breast health clinic has demonstrated equivalent PM uptake as compared to patients seen previously by medical oncologists. This model should be considered broadly. Additionally, low-dose tamoxifen has become the prescription of choice; thus, long-term studies of tamoxifen 5 mg are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":8229,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"2526-2533"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-024-16857-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Preventative medication (PM) uptake is low among patients at an elevated risk of breast cancer, largely due to fears of intolerance. This study aimed to investigate whether a new, surgical advanced practice provider (APP)-run clinic was effectively prescribing PM. We hypothesized equivalent rates of PM uptake compared to consultation with medical oncologists (MD).

Patients and methods: The APP-run clinic and accompanying database were initiated 01/2023, including patients with benign breast complaints and/or an elevated risk of invasive breast cancer. A historic single-institution surgical database and this prospective database were queried for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ between 04/2007-05/2023 and 01/2023-01/2024, respectively. Patients with invasive breast cancer within the prior 5 years were excluded. Chart review abstracted PM type/dose. Chi square analysis compared PM uptake rates and dose.

Results: A total of 523 patients met study criteria; the MD sample and APP sample were relatively well balanced except fewer hormone receptor positive patients in the MD sample (266/309 [86.1%] versus 202/214 [94.4%] APP, p < 0.01). PM uptake was lower in the MD sample (96/309 [31.1%] compared to the APP sample (86/214 [40.2%], p = 0.03). There was significantly more tamoxifen prescribed among the APP sample (58.2% vs. 35.6% among MD, p = 0.02), and low-dose tamoxifen prescribing increased significantly (47.3% vs. 9.8% MD, p < 0.01).

Conclusions: Our surgical APP-run breast health clinic has demonstrated equivalent PM uptake as compared to patients seen previously by medical oncologists. This model should be considered broadly. Additionally, low-dose tamoxifen has become the prescription of choice; thus, long-term studies of tamoxifen 5 mg are warranted.

在外科高级实践提供者经营的专门高危乳腺诊所就诊的DCIS患者有很高的预防性药物摄取率。
背景:乳腺癌高风险患者的预防性药物(PM)摄取较低,主要是由于担心不耐受。本研究旨在调查一个新的,外科高级实践提供者(APP)运行的诊所是否有效地开PM处方。我们假设与医学肿瘤学家(MD)咨询相比,PM摄取的等效率。患者和方法:应用程序运行的诊所和随附的数据库于2016年1月1日启动,包括有良性乳房疾病和/或浸润性乳腺癌风险升高的患者。我们分别查询了2007年4月- 2023年5月和2023年1月- 2024年1月间导管原位癌患者的历史单机构手术数据库和前瞻性数据库。排除5年内浸润性乳腺癌患者。图表回顾提取的PM类型/剂量。卡方分析比较了PM摄取率和剂量。结果:523例患者符合研究标准;MD样本和APP样本相对平衡良好,除了MD样本中较少的激素受体阳性患者(266/309[86.1%]对202/214 [94.4%]APP, p结论:我们的外科应用程序运行的乳房健康诊所与以前由内科肿瘤学家看到的患者相比,显示出相同的PM摄取。这种模式应该广泛考虑。此外,低剂量他莫昔芬已成为首选处方;因此,他莫昔芬5mg的长期研究是有必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
10.80%
发文量
1698
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgical Oncology is the official journal of The Society of Surgical Oncology and is published for the Society by Springer. The Annals publishes original and educational manuscripts about oncology for surgeons from all specialities in academic and community settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信