Comparison of Different Hemostatic Net Applications on Rat Dorsal Skin Flap Model.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Bilge Kaan İsmail, Kemal Fındıkçıoğlu, Serhat Şibar, Çiğdem Elmas
{"title":"Comparison of Different Hemostatic Net Applications on Rat Dorsal Skin Flap Model.","authors":"Bilge Kaan İsmail, Kemal Fındıkçıoğlu, Serhat Şibar, Çiğdem Elmas","doi":"10.1093/asj/sjaf010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are several articles discussing the use of a hemostatic net to close dead spaces, but no in-vivo experimental studies have simultaneously examined the histology and tissue perfusion of these techniques.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Our aim is to compare variations of the hemostatic net technique commonly used in current practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two different hemostatic net suturing techniques and two times of suture removal were tested, with a control group for comparison. In the modified McFarlane flap model, hemostatic net sutures are placed in either a vertical or horizontal pattern. Suture removal times are set at 60 hours and 7 days. Perfusion in the proximal, middle and distal parts of the flap was assessed by SPY device assisted immunofluorescence angiography at 0 minutes, 60 hours and 7 days after the first surgery. The rat dorsal flap was photographed in a standardised manner one week after surgery. Flap survival areas were calculated as a percentage using ImageJ software (US National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD). On day 20, all rats were sacrificed and sent for histological examination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no statistically significant difference in macroscopic flap survival between groups (p>0.05). Group 5 (control) was statistically different with lower neovascularisation scores than the other groups in all three segments (p<0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The hemostatic net may improve neovascularisation at the flap base but does not significantly affect overall flap survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":7728,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjaf010","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There are several articles discussing the use of a hemostatic net to close dead spaces, but no in-vivo experimental studies have simultaneously examined the histology and tissue perfusion of these techniques.

Objectives: Our aim is to compare variations of the hemostatic net technique commonly used in current practice.

Methods: Two different hemostatic net suturing techniques and two times of suture removal were tested, with a control group for comparison. In the modified McFarlane flap model, hemostatic net sutures are placed in either a vertical or horizontal pattern. Suture removal times are set at 60 hours and 7 days. Perfusion in the proximal, middle and distal parts of the flap was assessed by SPY device assisted immunofluorescence angiography at 0 minutes, 60 hours and 7 days after the first surgery. The rat dorsal flap was photographed in a standardised manner one week after surgery. Flap survival areas were calculated as a percentage using ImageJ software (US National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD). On day 20, all rats were sacrificed and sent for histological examination.

Results: There was no statistically significant difference in macroscopic flap survival between groups (p>0.05). Group 5 (control) was statistically different with lower neovascularisation scores than the other groups in all three segments (p<0.01).

Conclusions: The hemostatic net may improve neovascularisation at the flap base but does not significantly affect overall flap survival.

不同止血网在大鼠背侧皮瓣模型上应用的比较。
背景:有几篇文章讨论使用止血网闭合死腔,但没有体内实验研究同时检查这些技术的组织学和组织灌注。目的:我们的目的是比较目前常用的止血网技术的变化。方法:观察两种不同止血网缝合技术及两次拆线情况,并与对照组进行比较。在改良的麦克法兰皮瓣模型中,止血网缝合线以垂直或水平模式放置。取线时间分别为60小时和7天。首次手术后0分钟、60小时和7天,采用SPY装置辅助免疫荧光血管造影评估皮瓣近、中、远端灌注情况。术后1周对大鼠背皮瓣进行标准化拍照。使用ImageJ软件(美国国家卫生研究所,Bethesda, MD)计算皮瓣存活面积的百分比。第20天处死大鼠,送组织学检查。结果:两组间肉眼皮瓣存活率比较,差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。第5组(对照组)在所有三个节段的新生血管评分均低于其他组,差异有统计学意义(p结论:止血网可改善皮瓣基部的新生血管,但对皮瓣整体存活无显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
20.70%
发文量
309
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Aesthetic Surgery Journal is a peer-reviewed international journal focusing on scientific developments and clinical techniques in aesthetic surgery. The official publication of The Aesthetic Society, ASJ is also the official English-language journal of many major international societies of plastic, aesthetic and reconstructive surgery representing South America, Central America, Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. It is also the official journal of the British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons, the Canadian Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and The Rhinoplasty Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信