Bilge Kaan İsmail, Kemal Fındıkçıoğlu, Serhat Şibar, Çiğdem Elmas
{"title":"Comparison of Different Hemostatic Net Applications on Rat Dorsal Skin Flap Model.","authors":"Bilge Kaan İsmail, Kemal Fındıkçıoğlu, Serhat Şibar, Çiğdem Elmas","doi":"10.1093/asj/sjaf010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are several articles discussing the use of a hemostatic net to close dead spaces, but no in-vivo experimental studies have simultaneously examined the histology and tissue perfusion of these techniques.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Our aim is to compare variations of the hemostatic net technique commonly used in current practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two different hemostatic net suturing techniques and two times of suture removal were tested, with a control group for comparison. In the modified McFarlane flap model, hemostatic net sutures are placed in either a vertical or horizontal pattern. Suture removal times are set at 60 hours and 7 days. Perfusion in the proximal, middle and distal parts of the flap was assessed by SPY device assisted immunofluorescence angiography at 0 minutes, 60 hours and 7 days after the first surgery. The rat dorsal flap was photographed in a standardised manner one week after surgery. Flap survival areas were calculated as a percentage using ImageJ software (US National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD). On day 20, all rats were sacrificed and sent for histological examination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no statistically significant difference in macroscopic flap survival between groups (p>0.05). Group 5 (control) was statistically different with lower neovascularisation scores than the other groups in all three segments (p<0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The hemostatic net may improve neovascularisation at the flap base but does not significantly affect overall flap survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":7728,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjaf010","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: There are several articles discussing the use of a hemostatic net to close dead spaces, but no in-vivo experimental studies have simultaneously examined the histology and tissue perfusion of these techniques.
Objectives: Our aim is to compare variations of the hemostatic net technique commonly used in current practice.
Methods: Two different hemostatic net suturing techniques and two times of suture removal were tested, with a control group for comparison. In the modified McFarlane flap model, hemostatic net sutures are placed in either a vertical or horizontal pattern. Suture removal times are set at 60 hours and 7 days. Perfusion in the proximal, middle and distal parts of the flap was assessed by SPY device assisted immunofluorescence angiography at 0 minutes, 60 hours and 7 days after the first surgery. The rat dorsal flap was photographed in a standardised manner one week after surgery. Flap survival areas were calculated as a percentage using ImageJ software (US National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD). On day 20, all rats were sacrificed and sent for histological examination.
Results: There was no statistically significant difference in macroscopic flap survival between groups (p>0.05). Group 5 (control) was statistically different with lower neovascularisation scores than the other groups in all three segments (p<0.01).
Conclusions: The hemostatic net may improve neovascularisation at the flap base but does not significantly affect overall flap survival.
期刊介绍:
Aesthetic Surgery Journal is a peer-reviewed international journal focusing on scientific developments and clinical techniques in aesthetic surgery. The official publication of The Aesthetic Society, ASJ is also the official English-language journal of many major international societies of plastic, aesthetic and reconstructive surgery representing South America, Central America, Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. It is also the official journal of the British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons, the Canadian Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and The Rhinoplasty Society.