Effect of warm needle therapy guided by ultrasound on pain relief and improvement of physical function in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
American journal of translational research Pub Date : 2024-12-15 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.62347/KFNE8547
Yong Yuan, Ping Li
{"title":"Effect of warm needle therapy guided by ultrasound on pain relief and improvement of physical function in patients with knee osteoarthritis.","authors":"Yong Yuan, Ping Li","doi":"10.62347/KFNE8547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Conventional treatments for knee osteoarthritis (KOA) often fall short in providing optimal outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effect of warm needle therapy guided by ultrasound on pain relief and physical function in patients with KOA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, the clinical records of patients with KOA undergoing either meloxicam alone or meloxicam combined with warm needle therapy were reviewed. Various parameters, including pain evaluations, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores, range of motion for knee flexion, knee society scores, quality of life scores, inflammatory factor levels, and patient satisfaction were comparatively analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 140 patients were included, including 68 patients treated by Meloxicam and 72 patients treated by Meloxicam and warm needle therapy. Following treatment, the meloxicam combined with warm needle therapy group exhibited lower pain scores (3.62±1.98 vs. 4.38±1.95, P=0.023), improved WOMAC scores (27.82±8.75 vs. 31.25±8.82, P=0.022), increased range of motion (136.82°±8.58° vs. 133.43°±8.86°, P=0.023), higher knee society scores (93.32±7.21 vs. 90.21±7.78, P=0.016), and superior Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36) scores (81.24±6.33 vs. 78.43±6.85, P=0.013). Furthermore, a significant reduction in inflammatory factors including interleukin-8 (IL-8), matrix metalloproteinase-3 (MMP-3), Interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β), Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha (TNF-α), and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) levels was observed in the meloxicam combined with warm needle therapy group compared to the meloxicam alone group (all P<0.05). Patient satisfaction was likewise notably higher in the meloxicam combined with warm needle therapy group (8.43±2.15 vs. 7.58±2.24, P=0.024), with a greater proportion of patients willing to recommend the treatment (81.94% vs. 64.71%, P=0.034).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Warm needle therapy guided by ultrasound, in combination with meloxicam, significantly improves pain relief, physical function, inflammatory modulation, and patient satisfaction in KOA patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":7731,"journal":{"name":"American journal of translational research","volume":"16 12","pages":"7467-7479"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11733343/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of translational research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/KFNE8547","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Conventional treatments for knee osteoarthritis (KOA) often fall short in providing optimal outcomes.

Objective: To evaluate the effect of warm needle therapy guided by ultrasound on pain relief and physical function in patients with KOA.

Methods: In this retrospective study, the clinical records of patients with KOA undergoing either meloxicam alone or meloxicam combined with warm needle therapy were reviewed. Various parameters, including pain evaluations, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores, range of motion for knee flexion, knee society scores, quality of life scores, inflammatory factor levels, and patient satisfaction were comparatively analyzed.

Results: A total of 140 patients were included, including 68 patients treated by Meloxicam and 72 patients treated by Meloxicam and warm needle therapy. Following treatment, the meloxicam combined with warm needle therapy group exhibited lower pain scores (3.62±1.98 vs. 4.38±1.95, P=0.023), improved WOMAC scores (27.82±8.75 vs. 31.25±8.82, P=0.022), increased range of motion (136.82°±8.58° vs. 133.43°±8.86°, P=0.023), higher knee society scores (93.32±7.21 vs. 90.21±7.78, P=0.016), and superior Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36) scores (81.24±6.33 vs. 78.43±6.85, P=0.013). Furthermore, a significant reduction in inflammatory factors including interleukin-8 (IL-8), matrix metalloproteinase-3 (MMP-3), Interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β), Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha (TNF-α), and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) levels was observed in the meloxicam combined with warm needle therapy group compared to the meloxicam alone group (all P<0.05). Patient satisfaction was likewise notably higher in the meloxicam combined with warm needle therapy group (8.43±2.15 vs. 7.58±2.24, P=0.024), with a greater proportion of patients willing to recommend the treatment (81.94% vs. 64.71%, P=0.034).

Conclusion: Warm needle therapy guided by ultrasound, in combination with meloxicam, significantly improves pain relief, physical function, inflammatory modulation, and patient satisfaction in KOA patients.

超声引导下温针疗法对膝骨关节炎患者疼痛缓解及身体功能改善的影响。
背景:膝骨关节炎(KOA)的常规治疗往往不能提供最佳的结果。目的:探讨超声引导下温针疗法对KOA患者疼痛缓解及身体功能的影响。方法:回顾性分析美洛昔康单用或美洛昔康联合温针治疗KOA患者的临床资料。比较分析各种参数,包括疼痛评估、西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)评分、膝关节屈曲活动范围、膝关节社会评分、生活质量评分、炎症因子水平和患者满意度。结果:共纳入140例患者,其中美洛昔康治疗68例,美洛昔康联合温针治疗72例。治疗后,美洛昔康联合温针治疗组疼痛评分较低(3.62±1.98比4.38±1.95,P=0.023), WOMAC评分较高(27.82±8.75比31.25±8.82,P=0.022),活动范围增大(136.82°±8.58°比133.43°±8.86°,P=0.023),膝关节社会评分较高(93.32±7.21比90.21±7.78,P=0.016), SF-36评分较高(81.24±6.33比78.43±6.85,P=0.013)。此外,与单独使用美洛昔康组相比,美洛昔康联合热针治疗组炎症因子包括白细胞介素-8 (IL-8)、基质金属蛋白酶-3 (MMP-3)、白细胞介素-1β (IL-1β)、肿瘤坏死因子-α (TNF-α)、环氧化酶-2 (COX-2)水平均显著降低(均p < 0.05)。超声引导下温针联合美洛昔康治疗可显著改善KOA患者的疼痛缓解、身体功能、炎症调节及患者满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of translational research
American journal of translational research ONCOLOGY-MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
自引率
0.00%
发文量
552
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信