Nipple Position and Clinical Outcomes Following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: An Examination of Prepectoral and Subpectoral Implant-Based Reconstruction Using 3D Imaging.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Carrie S Stern, Francis D Graziano, Donovan R White, Ronnie L Shammas, Ethan L Plotsker, Elizabeth Smith-Montes, Lillian Boe, Jacob Levy, Tracy-Ann Moo, Virgilio Sacchini, Robert Allen, Babak Mehrara, Jonas A Nelson
{"title":"Nipple Position and Clinical Outcomes Following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: An Examination of Prepectoral and Subpectoral Implant-Based Reconstruction Using 3D Imaging.","authors":"Carrie S Stern, Francis D Graziano, Donovan R White, Ronnie L Shammas, Ethan L Plotsker, Elizabeth Smith-Montes, Lillian Boe, Jacob Levy, Tracy-Ann Moo, Virgilio Sacchini, Robert Allen, Babak Mehrara, Jonas A Nelson","doi":"10.1093/asj/sjaf004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) has become increasingly popular in recent years. However, the impact of prepectoral versus subpectoral implant reconstruction on nipple position, clinical outcomes, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after NSM remains unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We hypothesized that prepectoral reconstruction would lead to a more anatomic nipple position and improved clinical outcomes and PROs as compared to subpectoral reconstruction following NSM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Surgical characteristics, complications, and PROs in NSM patients with implant-based reconstruction from 2018 to 2021 were prospectively collected. Nipple displacement from baseline was analyzed using three-dimensional (3D) surface imaging.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>216 patients underwent 391 NSMs, separated into subpectoral (n = 96) and prepectoral (n = 120) cohorts. There were no differences in demographic and comorbidities between cohorts. Prepectoral showed a greater incidence of short-term return to OR (21% vs 10%, p=0.026). 3D analysis for 96 patients and 175 nipple positions were conducted. Compared to preoperative baseline, 3D imaging at 12 months postoperatively showed that the subpectoral cohort had greater straight-line distance between the nipples (23.1 mm vs 17.3 mm, p<0.001) and more lateral nipple displacement (9.2 mm vs 6.1 mm, p<0.001) as compared to the prepectoral cohort. Regression analysis found no relationship between incision pattern and nipple displacement. No postoperative differences were seen in PROs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Subpectoral NSM reconstruction was found to have more lateralized nipple displacement as compared to prepectoral patients, regardless of incision pattern used. Nipple displacement after NSM can play a significant role in postoperative aesthetic appearance and should be considered when deciding implant plane.</p>","PeriodicalId":7728,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjaf004","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) has become increasingly popular in recent years. However, the impact of prepectoral versus subpectoral implant reconstruction on nipple position, clinical outcomes, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after NSM remains unknown.

Objective: We hypothesized that prepectoral reconstruction would lead to a more anatomic nipple position and improved clinical outcomes and PROs as compared to subpectoral reconstruction following NSM.

Methods: Surgical characteristics, complications, and PROs in NSM patients with implant-based reconstruction from 2018 to 2021 were prospectively collected. Nipple displacement from baseline was analyzed using three-dimensional (3D) surface imaging.

Results: 216 patients underwent 391 NSMs, separated into subpectoral (n = 96) and prepectoral (n = 120) cohorts. There were no differences in demographic and comorbidities between cohorts. Prepectoral showed a greater incidence of short-term return to OR (21% vs 10%, p=0.026). 3D analysis for 96 patients and 175 nipple positions were conducted. Compared to preoperative baseline, 3D imaging at 12 months postoperatively showed that the subpectoral cohort had greater straight-line distance between the nipples (23.1 mm vs 17.3 mm, p<0.001) and more lateral nipple displacement (9.2 mm vs 6.1 mm, p<0.001) as compared to the prepectoral cohort. Regression analysis found no relationship between incision pattern and nipple displacement. No postoperative differences were seen in PROs.

Conclusions: Subpectoral NSM reconstruction was found to have more lateralized nipple displacement as compared to prepectoral patients, regardless of incision pattern used. Nipple displacement after NSM can play a significant role in postoperative aesthetic appearance and should be considered when deciding implant plane.

乳房保留乳头切除术后的乳头位置和临床结果:使用3D成像检查胸前和胸下植入物重建。
背景:保留乳头乳房切除术(NSM)近年来越来越流行。然而,胸前与胸下植入物重建对乳头位置、临床结果和NSM后患者报告的结果(PROs)的影响尚不清楚。目的:我们假设与NSM后的胸下重建术相比,胸前重建术会导致更解剖的乳头位置,改善临床结果和PROs。方法:前瞻性收集2018 - 2021年NSM患者种植体重建的手术特点、并发症和PROs。使用三维(3D)表面成像分析乳头从基线位移。结果:216例患者接受了391例NSMs,分为胸下组(n = 96)和胸前组(n = 120)。队列之间的人口统计学和合并症没有差异。预选组的OR短期复发率更高(21% vs 10%, p=0.026)。对96例患者和175个乳头位置进行了三维分析。与术前基线相比,术后12个月的3D成像显示,胸下组患者乳头之间的直线距离更大(23.1 mm vs 17.3 mm)。结论:无论采用何种切口方式,与胸下NSM重建患者相比,胸下NSM重建患者乳头偏侧移位更多。NSM术后乳头移位对术后美观有重要影响,在确定种植平面时应予以考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
20.70%
发文量
309
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Aesthetic Surgery Journal is a peer-reviewed international journal focusing on scientific developments and clinical techniques in aesthetic surgery. The official publication of The Aesthetic Society, ASJ is also the official English-language journal of many major international societies of plastic, aesthetic and reconstructive surgery representing South America, Central America, Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. It is also the official journal of the British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons, the Canadian Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and The Rhinoplasty Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信