Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio correlate with the occurrence and prognosis of progressive hemorrhagic injury in patients with traumatic brain injury.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
American journal of translational research Pub Date : 2024-12-15 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.62347/JEDY7237
Yong Wang, Cuili Di, Guiliang Zhao, Yaqun Zhao
{"title":"Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio correlate with the occurrence and prognosis of progressive hemorrhagic injury in patients with traumatic brain injury.","authors":"Yong Wang, Cuili Di, Guiliang Zhao, Yaqun Zhao","doi":"10.62347/JEDY7237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify risk factors associated with progressive hemorrhagic injury (PHI) in patients with isolated traumatic brain injury (TBI) and to develop prognostic models for predicting patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 137 patients with isolated TBI who underwent additional CT scans were included in the retrospective study. Single-factor analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed to identify significant risk factors associated with PHI development. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was conducted to evaluate the diagnostic value of specific markers for predicting PHI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Single-factor analysis revealed significant differences between the PHI group (62 patients) and the non-PHI group (75 patients) in various factors, including gender, etiology, pupillary size and reflex, midline shift, associated brain contusion, D-dimer (D-D) levels, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet count, blood glucose levels, and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified NLR, blood glucose level, and GCS score as significant risk factors for PHI in isolated TBI patients, and also identified GCS score, NLR, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and age as significant factors for predicting prognosis. ROC curve analysis showed that NLR had significant auxiliary diagnostic value for predicting PHI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NLR, blood glucose level, and GCS score are significant risk factors for PHI development in isolated TBI patients. The constructed prognostic model incorporating age, GCS score, NLR, and PLR offers valuable predictive capabilities for PHI patient outcome in isolated TBI cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":7731,"journal":{"name":"American journal of translational research","volume":"16 12","pages":"7716-7724"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11733330/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of translational research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/JEDY7237","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To identify risk factors associated with progressive hemorrhagic injury (PHI) in patients with isolated traumatic brain injury (TBI) and to develop prognostic models for predicting patient outcomes.

Methods: A total of 137 patients with isolated TBI who underwent additional CT scans were included in the retrospective study. Single-factor analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed to identify significant risk factors associated with PHI development. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was conducted to evaluate the diagnostic value of specific markers for predicting PHI.

Results: Single-factor analysis revealed significant differences between the PHI group (62 patients) and the non-PHI group (75 patients) in various factors, including gender, etiology, pupillary size and reflex, midline shift, associated brain contusion, D-dimer (D-D) levels, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet count, blood glucose levels, and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified NLR, blood glucose level, and GCS score as significant risk factors for PHI in isolated TBI patients, and also identified GCS score, NLR, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and age as significant factors for predicting prognosis. ROC curve analysis showed that NLR had significant auxiliary diagnostic value for predicting PHI.

Conclusion: NLR, blood glucose level, and GCS score are significant risk factors for PHI development in isolated TBI patients. The constructed prognostic model incorporating age, GCS score, NLR, and PLR offers valuable predictive capabilities for PHI patient outcome in isolated TBI cases.

中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值、血小板与淋巴细胞比值与颅脑损伤进行性出血性损伤的发生及预后相关。
目的:确定与孤立性创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者进行性出血性损伤(PHI)相关的危险因素,并建立预测患者预后的预后模型。方法:回顾性研究共纳入137例单独的TBI患者,他们接受了额外的CT扫描。进行单因素分析和多因素logistic回归分析,以确定与PHI发展相关的重要危险因素。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析,评价特定标志物预测PHI的诊断价值。结果:单因素分析显示,PHI组(62例)与非PHI组(75例)在性别、病因、瞳孔大小和反射、中线移位、相关脑挫伤、d -二聚体(D-D)水平、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、血小板计数、血糖水平和格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分等各方面均存在显著差异。多因素logistic回归分析发现NLR、血糖水平和GCS评分是孤立性TBI患者PHI的重要危险因素,GCS评分、NLR、血小板与淋巴细胞比(PLR)和年龄是预测预后的重要因素。ROC曲线分析显示NLR对预测PHI有显著的辅助诊断价值。结论:NLR、血糖水平和GCS评分是孤立性TBI患者PHI发生的重要危险因素。构建的预后模型结合了年龄、GCS评分、NLR和PLR,为孤立性TBI病例中PHI患者的预后提供了有价值的预测能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of translational research
American journal of translational research ONCOLOGY-MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
自引率
0.00%
发文量
552
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信