Radiomics for prediction of perineural invasion in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Ning Tang, Shicen Pan, Qirong Zhang, Jian Zhou, Zhiwei Zuo, Rui Jiang, Jinping Sheng
{"title":"Radiomics for prediction of perineural invasion in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Ning Tang, Shicen Pan, Qirong Zhang, Jian Zhou, Zhiwei Zuo, Rui Jiang, Jinping Sheng","doi":"10.1007/s00261-024-04713-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Perineural invasion (PNI) in colorectal cancer (CRC) is a significant prognostic factor associated with poor outcomes. Radiomics, which involves extracting quantitative features from medical imaging, has emerged as a potential tool for predicting PNI. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of radiomics models in predicting PNI in CRC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science for studies published up to July 28, 2024. Inclusion criteria focused on studies using radiomics models to predict PNI in CRC with sufficient data to construct diagnostic accuracy metrics. The quality of the included studies was assessed using QUADAS-2 and METRICS tools. Pooled estimates of sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated. Subgroup analyses were performed based on imaging modalities, segmentation methods, and other variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve studies comprising 2853 patients were included in the systematic review, with ten studies contributing to the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for radiomics models in predicting PNI were 0.74 (95% CI: 0.63-0.82) and 0.85 (95% CI: 0.79-0.90), respectively, in the training cohorts. In the validation cohorts, the sensitivity was 0.65 (95% CI: 0.57-0.72), and specificity was 0.85 (95% CI: 0.81-0.89). The AUC was 0.87 (95% CI: 0.63-0.82) for the training cohorts and 0.84 (95% CI: 0.81-0.87) for the validation cohorts, indicating good diagnostic accuracy. The METRICS scores for the included studies ranged from 65.8 to 85.1%, with an overall average score of 67.25%, reflecting good methodological quality. However, significant heterogeneity was observed across studies, particularly in sensitivity and specificity estimates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Radiomics models show promise as a non-invasive tool for predicting PNI in CRC, with moderate to good diagnostic accuracy. However, the current study's limitations, including reliance on retrospective data, geographic concentration in China, and methodological variability, suggest that further research is needed. Future studies should focus on prospective designs, standardization of methodologies, and the integration of advanced machine-learning techniques to improve the clinical applicability and reliability of radiomics models in CRC management.</p>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abdominal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-024-04713-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Perineural invasion (PNI) in colorectal cancer (CRC) is a significant prognostic factor associated with poor outcomes. Radiomics, which involves extracting quantitative features from medical imaging, has emerged as a potential tool for predicting PNI. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of radiomics models in predicting PNI in CRC.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science for studies published up to July 28, 2024. Inclusion criteria focused on studies using radiomics models to predict PNI in CRC with sufficient data to construct diagnostic accuracy metrics. The quality of the included studies was assessed using QUADAS-2 and METRICS tools. Pooled estimates of sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated. Subgroup analyses were performed based on imaging modalities, segmentation methods, and other variables.

Results: Twelve studies comprising 2853 patients were included in the systematic review, with ten studies contributing to the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for radiomics models in predicting PNI were 0.74 (95% CI: 0.63-0.82) and 0.85 (95% CI: 0.79-0.90), respectively, in the training cohorts. In the validation cohorts, the sensitivity was 0.65 (95% CI: 0.57-0.72), and specificity was 0.85 (95% CI: 0.81-0.89). The AUC was 0.87 (95% CI: 0.63-0.82) for the training cohorts and 0.84 (95% CI: 0.81-0.87) for the validation cohorts, indicating good diagnostic accuracy. The METRICS scores for the included studies ranged from 65.8 to 85.1%, with an overall average score of 67.25%, reflecting good methodological quality. However, significant heterogeneity was observed across studies, particularly in sensitivity and specificity estimates.

Conclusion: Radiomics models show promise as a non-invasive tool for predicting PNI in CRC, with moderate to good diagnostic accuracy. However, the current study's limitations, including reliance on retrospective data, geographic concentration in China, and methodological variability, suggest that further research is needed. Future studies should focus on prospective designs, standardization of methodologies, and the integration of advanced machine-learning techniques to improve the clinical applicability and reliability of radiomics models in CRC management.

放射组学用于预测结直肠癌的神经周围浸润:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
背景:结直肠癌(CRC)的周围神经侵犯(PNI)是与预后不良相关的重要预后因素。放射组学涉及从医学影像中提取定量特征,已成为预测PNI的潜在工具。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估放射组学模型预测结直肠癌PNI的诊断准确性。方法:在PubMed, Embase和Web of Science上进行全面的文献检索,检索截至2024年7月28日发表的研究。纳入标准侧重于使用放射组学模型预测CRC PNI的研究,并提供足够的数据来构建诊断准确性指标。采用QUADAS-2和METRICS工具评估纳入研究的质量。计算敏感性、特异性和曲线下面积(AUC)的综合估计。根据成像方式、分割方法和其他变量进行亚组分析。结果:包括2853例患者的12项研究被纳入系统评价,其中10项研究被纳入meta分析。放射组学模型预测PNI的敏感性和特异性在训练队列中分别为0.74 (95% CI: 0.63-0.82)和0.85 (95% CI: 0.79-0.90)。在验证队列中,敏感性为0.65 (95% CI: 0.57-0.72),特异性为0.85 (95% CI: 0.81-0.89)。训练队列的AUC为0.87 (95% CI: 0.63-0.82),验证队列的AUC为0.84 (95% CI: 0.81-0.87),表明诊断准确性良好。纳入研究的METRICS得分从65.8到85.1%不等,总体平均得分为67.25%,反映了良好的方法学质量。然而,在研究中观察到显著的异质性,特别是在敏感性和特异性估计方面。结论:放射组学模型有望作为预测结直肠癌PNI的非侵入性工具,具有中等到良好的诊断准确性。然而,目前研究的局限性,包括对回顾性数据的依赖、中国的地理集中和方法的可变性,表明需要进一步的研究。未来的研究应侧重于前瞻性设计、方法标准化和先进机器学习技术的整合,以提高放射组学模型在CRC管理中的临床适用性和可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Abdominal Radiology
Abdominal Radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
334
期刊介绍: Abdominal Radiology seeks to meet the professional needs of the abdominal radiologist by publishing clinically pertinent original, review and practice related articles on the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts and abdominal interventional and radiologic procedures. Case reports are generally not accepted unless they are the first report of a new disease or condition, or part of a special solicited section. Reasons to Publish Your Article in Abdominal Radiology: · Official journal of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) · Published in Cooperation with: European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) Asian Society of Abdominal Radiology (ASAR) · Efficient handling and Expeditious review · Author feedback is provided in a mentoring style · Global readership · Readers can earn CME credits
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信