Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices in Colorectal Cancer Screening in the Philippines.

Q4 Medicine
Acta Medica Philippina Pub Date : 2024-12-13 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.47895/amp.vi0.8608
Joseff Karl U Fernandez, Martin Augustine B Borlongan, Michael Anthony A Baliton, Dennis L Sacdalan, Florge Francis A Sy, Analigaya R Agoncillo, Carl Lawrence C Arenos, Vincent F Tatoy, Timothy Joseph S Uy, Isabela Andrea L Reveldez, Steven Johnson L Lim
{"title":"Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices in Colorectal Cancer Screening in the Philippines.","authors":"Joseff Karl U Fernandez, Martin Augustine B Borlongan, Michael Anthony A Baliton, Dennis L Sacdalan, Florge Francis A Sy, Analigaya R Agoncillo, Carl Lawrence C Arenos, Vincent F Tatoy, Timothy Joseph S Uy, Isabela Andrea L Reveldez, Steven Johnson L Lim","doi":"10.47895/amp.vi0.8608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Colorectal cancer (CRC) has the third highest incidence in the Philippines. Currently, there is a paucity in literature that is focused on the knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of Filipinos regarding CRC screening. This is the first study in the Philippines that describes this.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a cross-sectional study that validated a 52-item Filipino questionnaire on the knowledge on colorectal cancer, willingness to undergo CRC screening, and perceived benefits and barriers to fecal occult blood test (FOBT) and colonoscopy. The study enrolled household heads more than 20 years of age residing in both urban and rural communities in the Philippines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The UP-PGH CRC KAP (University of the Philippines - Philippine General Hospital Colorectal Cancer Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices) and Rawl Questionnaire's validity and internal consistency were established in a pilot study of 30 respondents. A total of 288 respondents were then enrolled to the main study group with a median age of 54.0. Knowledge scores for prognosis and utility of CRC screening were modest (6.3/12 and 8.4/20, respectively). Perceived benefit scores to FOBT and colonoscopy were high (9.9/12 and 13.9/16, respectively). Median scores to barriers to FOBT and colonoscopy were intermediate (22.5/36 and 35.8/60, respectively). Notably, a vast majority (86.1%) were willing to participate in CRC screening programs initiated by the government, and 46.9% agreed to undergo screening tests even as out-of-pocket expense.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The UP-PGH CRC KAP Questionnaire as well as the Filipino translation of the Rawl Questionnaire are reliable and valid tools in extensively assessing the knowledge of Filipinos on CRC and willingness to undergo screening, as well as the benefits of and barriers to FOBT and colonoscopy. Knowledge scores were modest suggesting that directed educational campaigns and awareness programs can aid in increasing awareness about CRC and its screening. Household income and highest educational attainment were significantly positively correlated with knowledge scores, and perceived benefits of and barriers to CRC screening. Scores were generally comparable between urban and rural communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":6994,"journal":{"name":"Acta Medica Philippina","volume":"58 22","pages":"77-91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11732593/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Medica Philippina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47895/amp.vi0.8608","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Colorectal cancer (CRC) has the third highest incidence in the Philippines. Currently, there is a paucity in literature that is focused on the knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of Filipinos regarding CRC screening. This is the first study in the Philippines that describes this.

Methods: This is a cross-sectional study that validated a 52-item Filipino questionnaire on the knowledge on colorectal cancer, willingness to undergo CRC screening, and perceived benefits and barriers to fecal occult blood test (FOBT) and colonoscopy. The study enrolled household heads more than 20 years of age residing in both urban and rural communities in the Philippines.

Results: The UP-PGH CRC KAP (University of the Philippines - Philippine General Hospital Colorectal Cancer Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices) and Rawl Questionnaire's validity and internal consistency were established in a pilot study of 30 respondents. A total of 288 respondents were then enrolled to the main study group with a median age of 54.0. Knowledge scores for prognosis and utility of CRC screening were modest (6.3/12 and 8.4/20, respectively). Perceived benefit scores to FOBT and colonoscopy were high (9.9/12 and 13.9/16, respectively). Median scores to barriers to FOBT and colonoscopy were intermediate (22.5/36 and 35.8/60, respectively). Notably, a vast majority (86.1%) were willing to participate in CRC screening programs initiated by the government, and 46.9% agreed to undergo screening tests even as out-of-pocket expense.

Conclusion: The UP-PGH CRC KAP Questionnaire as well as the Filipino translation of the Rawl Questionnaire are reliable and valid tools in extensively assessing the knowledge of Filipinos on CRC and willingness to undergo screening, as well as the benefits of and barriers to FOBT and colonoscopy. Knowledge scores were modest suggesting that directed educational campaigns and awareness programs can aid in increasing awareness about CRC and its screening. Household income and highest educational attainment were significantly positively correlated with knowledge scores, and perceived benefits of and barriers to CRC screening. Scores were generally comparable between urban and rural communities.

菲律宾结直肠癌筛查的知识、态度和实践。
背景与目的:结直肠癌(CRC)是菲律宾发病率第三高的疾病。目前,文献缺乏关注菲律宾人对CRC筛查的知识、态度和看法。这是菲律宾第一个描述这种情况的研究。方法:这是一项横断面研究,验证了菲律宾人对结直肠癌的知识、接受结直肠癌筛查的意愿、粪便隐血检查(FOBT)和结肠镜检查的益处和障碍的52项调查问卷。该研究招募了居住在菲律宾城市和农村社区的20岁以上的户主。结果:uppgh CRC KAP(菲律宾大学-菲律宾总医院结直肠癌知识、态度和实践)和Rawl问卷的有效性和内部一致性在30名受访者的试点研究中建立。共有288名受访者被纳入主研究组,中位年龄为54.0岁。预后和CRC筛查效用的知识得分一般(分别为6.3/12和8.4/20)。FOBT和结肠镜检查的感知获益得分较高(分别为9.9/12和13.9/16)。FOBT和结肠镜检查障碍的中位评分为中等(分别为22.5/36和35.8/60)。值得注意的是,绝大多数人(86.1%)愿意参加政府发起的CRC筛查项目,46.9%的人同意接受筛查测试,即使是自付费用。结论:UP-PGH CRC KAP问卷以及罗尔问卷的菲律宾语翻译是广泛评估菲律宾人对CRC的知识和接受筛查的意愿以及FOBT和结肠镜检查的益处和障碍的可靠和有效的工具。知识得分一般,这表明有针对性的教育活动和意识项目可以帮助提高对CRC及其筛查的认识。家庭收入和最高受教育程度与知识得分、CRC筛查的获益和障碍显著正相关。城市和农村社区的得分大致相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Medica Philippina
Acta Medica Philippina Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
199
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信