Intraoperative impedance and ECAP results in cochlear implant recipients with inner ear malformations and normal cochlear anatomy: a retrospective analysis.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Merve İkiz Bozsoy, Aysun Parlak Kocabay, Betül Koska, Beyza Demirtaş Yılmaz, Merve Özses, Nizamettin Burak Avcı, Selvet Akkaplan, Zeynep Budak Ateş, Betül Çiçek Çınar, Mehmet Yaralı, Merve Özbal Batuk, Gonca Sennaroğlu, Levent Sennaroğlu
{"title":"Intraoperative impedance and ECAP results in cochlear implant recipients with inner ear malformations and normal cochlear anatomy: a retrospective analysis.","authors":"Merve İkiz Bozsoy, Aysun Parlak Kocabay, Betül Koska, Beyza Demirtaş Yılmaz, Merve Özses, Nizamettin Burak Avcı, Selvet Akkaplan, Zeynep Budak Ateş, Betül Çiçek Çınar, Mehmet Yaralı, Merve Özbal Batuk, Gonca Sennaroğlu, Levent Sennaroğlu","doi":"10.1080/00016489.2025.2452346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The intraoperative measurements are essential steps in cochlear implant (CI) surgery for confirming correct electrode placement.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine the intraoperative impedance and electrically evoked action potential (ECAP) measurement results of cochlear implant (CI) users with normal cochlear anatomy (NCA) and to compare them with CI users with inner ear malformations (IEM).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included intraoperative data of 300 ears from 258 individuals using Medel<sup>®</sup> and Cochlear (Nucleus<sup>®</sup>) CI devices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Impedance values differed through all regions, and that differences in ECAPs results mainly stemmed from the basal region in Cochlear users, when comparing the impedance values and ECAPs recording prevalence between the NCA and IEM groups, it was observed that there was no significant difference in the impedance values across the intracochlear regions of the groups (apical; <i>p</i> = .26, middle; <i>p</i> = .12, basal; <i>p</i> = .99). However, it was found that the prevalence of measurable ECAPs in all intracochlear regions of the NCA group was higher than the IEM group (<i>p</i> = .000).</p><p><strong>Conclusion and significance: </strong>The robustness of cochlear structures is a crucial factor in the recording of ECAPs. Furthermore, findings in the IEM group demonstrated that proper placement of intracochlear electrodes did not guarantee effective auditory nerve stimulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":6880,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oto-Laryngologica","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Oto-Laryngologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00016489.2025.2452346","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The intraoperative measurements are essential steps in cochlear implant (CI) surgery for confirming correct electrode placement.

Objectives: To examine the intraoperative impedance and electrically evoked action potential (ECAP) measurement results of cochlear implant (CI) users with normal cochlear anatomy (NCA) and to compare them with CI users with inner ear malformations (IEM).

Material and methods: This retrospective study included intraoperative data of 300 ears from 258 individuals using Medel® and Cochlear (Nucleus®) CI devices.

Results: Impedance values differed through all regions, and that differences in ECAPs results mainly stemmed from the basal region in Cochlear users, when comparing the impedance values and ECAPs recording prevalence between the NCA and IEM groups, it was observed that there was no significant difference in the impedance values across the intracochlear regions of the groups (apical; p = .26, middle; p = .12, basal; p = .99). However, it was found that the prevalence of measurable ECAPs in all intracochlear regions of the NCA group was higher than the IEM group (p = .000).

Conclusion and significance: The robustness of cochlear structures is a crucial factor in the recording of ECAPs. Furthermore, findings in the IEM group demonstrated that proper placement of intracochlear electrodes did not guarantee effective auditory nerve stimulation.

内耳畸形和耳蜗解剖正常的人工耳蜗受者术中阻抗和ECAP的结果:回顾性分析。
背景:术中测量是人工耳蜗(CI)手术中确定正确电极放置的重要步骤。目的:观察正常耳蜗解剖结构(NCA)的人工耳蜗(CI)使用者术中阻抗和电诱发动作电位(ECAP)测量结果,并与内耳畸形(IEM)的人工耳蜗使用者进行比较。材料和方法:本回顾性研究包括258例使用Medel®和Cochlear (Nucleus®)CI装置的患者300只耳的术中数据。结果:各区域阻抗值存在差异,ecap结果的差异主要来自耳蜗使用者的基底区,当比较NCA组和IEM组耳蜗内阻抗值和ecap记录流行率时,观察到两组耳蜗内阻抗值无显著差异(耳蜗尖区;p =。26日,中间;p =。12、基底;p = .99)。然而,我们发现NCA组所有耳蜗内区域可测量的ecap患病率高于IEM组(p = .000)。结论及意义:耳蜗结构的稳健性是记录ecap的关键因素。此外,IEM组的研究结果表明,耳蜗内电极的适当放置并不能保证有效的听神经刺激。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Oto-Laryngologica
Acta Oto-Laryngologica 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Oto-Laryngologica is a truly international journal for translational otolaryngology and head- and neck surgery. The journal presents cutting-edge papers on clinical practice, clinical research and basic sciences. Acta also bridges the gap between clinical and basic research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信