The Colonic Vitamin D Receptor and Inflammatory Bowel Disease: No Correlation to Histologic or Endoscopic Inflammation

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY
Apmis Pub Date : 2025-01-20 DOI:10.1111/apm.70000
Harald Bagger-Jörgensen, Christian Thomsen, Martine Borrisholt, Alkwin Wanders, Klas Sjöberg
{"title":"The Colonic Vitamin D Receptor and Inflammatory Bowel Disease: No Correlation to Histologic or Endoscopic Inflammation","authors":"Harald Bagger-Jörgensen,&nbsp;Christian Thomsen,&nbsp;Martine Borrisholt,&nbsp;Alkwin Wanders,&nbsp;Klas Sjöberg","doi":"10.1111/apm.70000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The role of the vitamin D receptor (VDR) in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is poorly described. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between immunohistochemical VDR expression and IBD activity. The immunohistochemical expression of VDR was analysed in biopsies from active and inactive IBD in 28 patients (ulcerative colitis: 21, Crohn's disease: 7) and 12 non-IBD controls. VDR expression did not change in active compared to inactive disease (<i>p</i> = 0.40 in epithelium and <i>p</i> = 0.29 in stroma). There was a trend for higher VDR expression in controls compared to IBD patients. No relationship was found between VDR expression and histologic inflammation (<i>r</i> = −0.19, <i>p</i> = 0.89 for epithelium and <i>r</i> = 0.13, <i>p</i> = 0.35 for stroma), colonoscopic picture and clinical and laboratory measures including serum 25(OH) vitamin D status (<i>r</i> = −0.91, <i>p</i> = 0.82). IBD disease activity did not correlate to VDR immunohistochemical expression, nor did it differ compared to controls. These results partly conflict with prior studies, but these have only shown modest correlations. Prospective studies investigating VDR activity between IBD and controls should be contemplated.</p>","PeriodicalId":8167,"journal":{"name":"Apmis","volume":"133 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11744339/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Apmis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apm.70000","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The role of the vitamin D receptor (VDR) in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is poorly described. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between immunohistochemical VDR expression and IBD activity. The immunohistochemical expression of VDR was analysed in biopsies from active and inactive IBD in 28 patients (ulcerative colitis: 21, Crohn's disease: 7) and 12 non-IBD controls. VDR expression did not change in active compared to inactive disease (p = 0.40 in epithelium and p = 0.29 in stroma). There was a trend for higher VDR expression in controls compared to IBD patients. No relationship was found between VDR expression and histologic inflammation (r = −0.19, p = 0.89 for epithelium and r = 0.13, p = 0.35 for stroma), colonoscopic picture and clinical and laboratory measures including serum 25(OH) vitamin D status (r = −0.91, p = 0.82). IBD disease activity did not correlate to VDR immunohistochemical expression, nor did it differ compared to controls. These results partly conflict with prior studies, but these have only shown modest correlations. Prospective studies investigating VDR activity between IBD and controls should be contemplated.

Abstract Image

结肠维生素D受体与炎症性肠病:与组织学或内镜炎症无关。
维生素D受体(VDR)在炎症性肠病(IBD)中的作用描述甚少。本研究的目的是研究免疫组织化学VDR表达与IBD活性之间的关系。对28例活动性和非活动性IBD患者(溃疡性结肠炎21例,克罗恩病7例)和12例非IBD对照的活检组织中VDR的免疫组织化学表达进行了分析。与非活动性疾病相比,活动性疾病的VDR表达没有变化(上皮p = 0.40,间质p = 0.29)。与IBD患者相比,对照组的VDR表达有更高的趋势。VDR表达与组织学炎症(上皮r = -0.19, p = 0.89,间质r = 0.13, p = 0.35)、结肠镜检查以及包括血清25(OH)维生素D水平在内的临床和实验室指标(r = -0.91, p = 0.82)均无关系。IBD疾病活动性与VDR免疫组织化学表达无关,与对照组相比也没有差异。这些结果部分与先前的研究相冲突,但这些研究只显示出适度的相关性。应该考虑对IBD和对照组之间的VDR活性进行前瞻性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Apmis
Apmis 医学-病理学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: APMIS, formerly Acta Pathologica, Microbiologica et Immunologica Scandinavica, has been published since 1924 by the Scandinavian Societies for Medical Microbiology and Pathology as a non-profit-making scientific journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信