No Bacterial Biomass Detected in Tissue From Patients With Ovarian Cancer and Serous Tubal Intraepithelial Carcinomas Using 16S rDNA Sequencing

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY
Apmis Pub Date : 2025-01-16 DOI:10.1111/apm.13509
Kasper Ingerslev, Tim Svenstrup Poulsen, Mikael Lenz Strube, Wojciech Skovrider-Ruminski, Doris Schledermann, Tine Henrichsen Schnack, Claus Høgdall, Jan Blaakær, Estrid Høgdall
{"title":"No Bacterial Biomass Detected in Tissue From Patients With Ovarian Cancer and Serous Tubal Intraepithelial Carcinomas Using 16S rDNA Sequencing","authors":"Kasper Ingerslev,&nbsp;Tim Svenstrup Poulsen,&nbsp;Mikael Lenz Strube,&nbsp;Wojciech Skovrider-Ruminski,&nbsp;Doris Schledermann,&nbsp;Tine Henrichsen Schnack,&nbsp;Claus Høgdall,&nbsp;Jan Blaakær,&nbsp;Estrid Høgdall","doi":"10.1111/apm.13509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The ovarian oncobiome is subject to increasing scientific focus, but a potential link between bacterial dysbiosis and ovarian carcinogenesis remains controversial. Our primary aim was to characterize the bacterial microbiota in epithelial ovarian cancer samples. Secondarily, we aimed to compare results from the bacterial microbiota in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded ovarian tissue samples from 194 patients with epithelial ovarian cancer, fallopian tube tissue samples from 16 patients with serous tubal intraepithelial carcinomas and in benign fallopian tube tissue samples from 25 patients. Bacterial abundance was investigated by means of 16S rDNA Next Generation Sequencing. The 16S rDNA sequencing run produced a very low number of bacterial reads. Only seven samples displayed bacterial reads above 5000. Validation of detected bacterial reads by qPCR was negative and indicative of results being background amplification. Our results indicate no amount of bacterial biomass in the ovarian cancer, benign fallopian tube and in the samples with serous tubal intraepithelial carcinomas. The findings underline the importance of validating results from bacterial microbiota studies with additional technical assays before any conclusion may be drawn.</p>","PeriodicalId":8167,"journal":{"name":"Apmis","volume":"133 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Apmis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apm.13509","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The ovarian oncobiome is subject to increasing scientific focus, but a potential link between bacterial dysbiosis and ovarian carcinogenesis remains controversial. Our primary aim was to characterize the bacterial microbiota in epithelial ovarian cancer samples. Secondarily, we aimed to compare results from the bacterial microbiota in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded ovarian tissue samples from 194 patients with epithelial ovarian cancer, fallopian tube tissue samples from 16 patients with serous tubal intraepithelial carcinomas and in benign fallopian tube tissue samples from 25 patients. Bacterial abundance was investigated by means of 16S rDNA Next Generation Sequencing. The 16S rDNA sequencing run produced a very low number of bacterial reads. Only seven samples displayed bacterial reads above 5000. Validation of detected bacterial reads by qPCR was negative and indicative of results being background amplification. Our results indicate no amount of bacterial biomass in the ovarian cancer, benign fallopian tube and in the samples with serous tubal intraepithelial carcinomas. The findings underline the importance of validating results from bacterial microbiota studies with additional technical assays before any conclusion may be drawn.

使用16S rDNA测序未检测到卵巢癌和浆液性输卵管上皮内癌患者组织中的细菌生物量。
卵巢肿瘤组受到越来越多的科学关注,但细菌生态失调与卵巢癌发生之间的潜在联系仍然存在争议。我们的主要目的是表征上皮性卵巢癌样本中的细菌微生物群。其次,我们的目的是比较194例上皮性卵巢癌患者的福尔马林固定石蜡包埋卵巢组织样本、16例浆液性输卵管上皮内癌患者的输卵管组织样本和25例良性输卵管组织样本中的细菌微生物群。采用16S rDNA Next Generation Sequencing检测细菌丰度。16S rDNA测序运行产生了非常少的细菌读数。只有7个样本显示细菌读数超过5000。qPCR检测到的细菌reads验证为阴性,表明结果为背景扩增。我们的研究结果表明,在卵巢癌、良性输卵管和浆液性输卵管上皮内癌的样本中,细菌生物量没有多少。这些发现强调了在得出任何结论之前,用额外的技术分析验证细菌微生物群研究结果的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Apmis
Apmis 医学-病理学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: APMIS, formerly Acta Pathologica, Microbiologica et Immunologica Scandinavica, has been published since 1924 by the Scandinavian Societies for Medical Microbiology and Pathology as a non-profit-making scientific journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信