Comparing PD-L1 and PD-1 inhibitors plus bevacizumab combined with hepatic arterial interventional therapies in unresetable hepatocellular carcinoma: A single-center, real-world study

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Minrui He, Wa Xie, Ze Yuan, Jinbin Chen, Juncheng Wang, Yizhen Fu, Zili Hu, Qi Meng, Wenqing Gao, Dandan Hu, Yaojun Zhang, Yangxun Pan, Zhongguo Zhou
{"title":"Comparing PD-L1 and PD-1 inhibitors plus bevacizumab combined with hepatic arterial interventional therapies in unresetable hepatocellular carcinoma: A single-center, real-world study","authors":"Minrui He,&nbsp;Wa Xie,&nbsp;Ze Yuan,&nbsp;Jinbin Chen,&nbsp;Juncheng Wang,&nbsp;Yizhen Fu,&nbsp;Zili Hu,&nbsp;Qi Meng,&nbsp;Wenqing Gao,&nbsp;Dandan Hu,&nbsp;Yaojun Zhang,&nbsp;Yangxun Pan,&nbsp;Zhongguo Zhou","doi":"10.1002/ijc.35341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>With the rise of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antibody and programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) regimens, particularly bevacizumab and atezolizumab, as first-line treatments for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), there is a need to explore PD-L1 and programmed cell death 1 inhibitors in combination therapies for unresectable HCC (uHCC). Integrating systemic therapies with locoregional approaches is also emerging as a potent strategy. This study compares the outcomes of atezolizumab (PD-L1 inhibitor) and sintilimab (programmed cell death 1 inhibitor) with bevacizumab or its biosimilar, combined with hepatic arterial interventional therapies (HAIT) in uHCC patients. From January 2020 to September 2023, a retrospective analysis was conducted on 138 uHCC patients at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. The cohort included 69 patients treated with atezolizumab with bevacizumab (Bev/Ate) and 69 with bevacizumab biosimilar with sintilimab (Bio/Sin), combined with HAIT. The propensity score matching was also employed to further explore the efficacy and safety. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 13.8 months for the Bev/Ate group and 10.0 months for the Bio/Sin group (<i>p</i> = 0.188). The Bev/Ate group showed significantly longer intrahepatic mPFS (HR 0.381; 95% confidence interval 0.176–0.824; <i>p</i> = .018) and higher overall response rates compared with the Bio/Sin group (60.87% vs. 31.88%, <i>p</i> = .001; 69.57% vs. 49.28%, <i>p</i> = .024) based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1 and modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria. Treatment-related adverse events were similar between groups (<i>p</i> &gt; .050). Combining atezolizumab or sintilimab with bevacizumab or its biosimilar alongside HAIT provided similar overall PFS in uHCC patients. However, the atezolizumab-bevacizumab combination with HAIT showed superior intrahepatic PFS and control rates, warranting further validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":180,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cancer","volume":"156 10","pages":"1972-1985"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ijc.35341","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the rise of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antibody and programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) regimens, particularly bevacizumab and atezolizumab, as first-line treatments for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), there is a need to explore PD-L1 and programmed cell death 1 inhibitors in combination therapies for unresectable HCC (uHCC). Integrating systemic therapies with locoregional approaches is also emerging as a potent strategy. This study compares the outcomes of atezolizumab (PD-L1 inhibitor) and sintilimab (programmed cell death 1 inhibitor) with bevacizumab or its biosimilar, combined with hepatic arterial interventional therapies (HAIT) in uHCC patients. From January 2020 to September 2023, a retrospective analysis was conducted on 138 uHCC patients at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. The cohort included 69 patients treated with atezolizumab with bevacizumab (Bev/Ate) and 69 with bevacizumab biosimilar with sintilimab (Bio/Sin), combined with HAIT. The propensity score matching was also employed to further explore the efficacy and safety. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 13.8 months for the Bev/Ate group and 10.0 months for the Bio/Sin group (p = 0.188). The Bev/Ate group showed significantly longer intrahepatic mPFS (HR 0.381; 95% confidence interval 0.176–0.824; p = .018) and higher overall response rates compared with the Bio/Sin group (60.87% vs. 31.88%, p = .001; 69.57% vs. 49.28%, p = .024) based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1 and modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria. Treatment-related adverse events were similar between groups (p > .050). Combining atezolizumab or sintilimab with bevacizumab or its biosimilar alongside HAIT provided similar overall PFS in uHCC patients. However, the atezolizumab-bevacizumab combination with HAIT showed superior intrahepatic PFS and control rates, warranting further validation.

Abstract Image

比较PD-L1和PD-1抑制剂加贝伐单抗联合肝动脉介入治疗不可修复的肝细胞癌:一项单中心,现实世界的研究
随着抗血管内皮生长因子抗体和程序性细胞死亡配体1 (PD-L1)方案,特别是贝伐单抗和阿特唑单抗,作为晚期肝细胞癌(HCC)的一线治疗方案的增加,有必要探索PD-L1和程序性细胞死亡1抑制剂在不可切除的HCC (uHCC)联合治疗中的应用。将全身治疗与局部治疗相结合也正在成为一种有效的策略。本研究比较了阿特唑单抗(PD-L1抑制剂)和辛替单抗(程序性细胞死亡1抑制剂)与贝伐单抗或其生物仿制药联合肝动脉介入治疗(HAIT)治疗uHCC患者的结果。2020年1月至2023年9月,对中山大学肿瘤中心138例uHCC患者进行回顾性分析。该队列包括69例用阿特唑单抗联合贝伐单抗(Bev/Ate)治疗的患者和69例用贝伐单抗生物类似药联合辛替单抗(Bio/Sin)联合HAIT治疗的患者。采用倾向评分匹配法进一步探讨其疗效和安全性。Bev/Ate组的中位无进展生存期(mPFS)为13.8个月,Bio/Sin组为10.0个月(p = 0.188)。Bev/Ate组肝内mPFS显著延长(HR 0.381;95%置信区间0.176-0.824;p = .018),总有效率高于Bio/Sin组(60.87% vs. 31.88%, p = .001;69.57% vs. 49.28%, p = 0.024),基于实体瘤v1.1版疗效评价标准和修改后的实体瘤疗效评价标准。治疗相关不良事件组间相似(p < 0.05)。阿特唑单抗或辛替单抗联合贝伐单抗或其生物类似药与HAIT联合使用在uHCC患者中提供了相似的总体PFS。然而,atezolizumab-bevacizumab联合HAIT显示出更好的肝内PFS和控制率,值得进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
3.10%
发文量
460
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Cancer (IJC) is the official journal of the Union for International Cancer Control—UICC; it appears twice a month. IJC invites submission of manuscripts under a broad scope of topics relevant to experimental and clinical cancer research and publishes original Research Articles and Short Reports under the following categories: -Cancer Epidemiology- Cancer Genetics and Epigenetics- Infectious Causes of Cancer- Innovative Tools and Methods- Molecular Cancer Biology- Tumor Immunology and Microenvironment- Tumor Markers and Signatures- Cancer Therapy and Prevention
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信