Robin Tannert, Sarah Barth, Jakob Hildebrandt, Andreas Taubert, Jens Weber
{"title":"Sustainability of Enzymatic Monomer Synthesis: Evaluation via Comparison of Petrochemical and Enzymatic Alkene Epoxidation by Life Cycle Assessment.","authors":"Robin Tannert, Sarah Barth, Jakob Hildebrandt, Andreas Taubert, Jens Weber","doi":"10.1002/cssc.202402248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Life cycle assessment (LCA) was used, next to green chemistry concepts, to compare the full environmental impacts of the epoxidation of a bio-based monomer, which can be used for the synthesis of vitrimers. On a laboratory scale, the synthesis of the monomer can either be done via a petrochemical route or via an enzymatic reaction pathway. Both reaction pathways were initially optimized to minimize the impact of suboptimal routes on the sustainability evaluation. The subsequent assessment of the enzymatic routes shows lower impact factors for most criteria compared to the petrochemical routes. A significant drawback of the enzymatic reaction, however, is its electricity consumption. The yields of the respective reactions also proved to be crucial; realistic changes in yields revealed the petrochemical reaction to be more sustainable in some cases. LCA is therefore a valuable tool for the preliminary evaluation of the developed synthesis pathways and to identify the critical adjustments needed to increase the sustainability of each reaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":149,"journal":{"name":"ChemSusChem","volume":" ","pages":"e202402248"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ChemSusChem","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.202402248","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Life cycle assessment (LCA) was used, next to green chemistry concepts, to compare the full environmental impacts of the epoxidation of a bio-based monomer, which can be used for the synthesis of vitrimers. On a laboratory scale, the synthesis of the monomer can either be done via a petrochemical route or via an enzymatic reaction pathway. Both reaction pathways were initially optimized to minimize the impact of suboptimal routes on the sustainability evaluation. The subsequent assessment of the enzymatic routes shows lower impact factors for most criteria compared to the petrochemical routes. A significant drawback of the enzymatic reaction, however, is its electricity consumption. The yields of the respective reactions also proved to be crucial; realistic changes in yields revealed the petrochemical reaction to be more sustainable in some cases. LCA is therefore a valuable tool for the preliminary evaluation of the developed synthesis pathways and to identify the critical adjustments needed to increase the sustainability of each reaction.
期刊介绍:
ChemSusChem
Impact Factor (2016): 7.226
Scope:
Interdisciplinary journal
Focuses on research at the interface of chemistry and sustainability
Features the best research on sustainability and energy
Areas Covered:
Chemistry
Materials Science
Chemical Engineering
Biotechnology