Sustainability of Enzymatic Monomer Synthesis: Evaluation via Comparison of Petrochemical and Enzymatic Alkene Epoxidation by Life Cycle Assessment.

IF 7.5 2区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
ChemSusChem Pub Date : 2025-01-20 DOI:10.1002/cssc.202402248
Robin Tannert, Sarah Barth, Jakob Hildebrandt, Andreas Taubert, Jens Weber
{"title":"Sustainability of Enzymatic Monomer Synthesis: Evaluation via Comparison of Petrochemical and Enzymatic Alkene Epoxidation by Life Cycle Assessment.","authors":"Robin Tannert, Sarah Barth, Jakob Hildebrandt, Andreas Taubert, Jens Weber","doi":"10.1002/cssc.202402248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Life cycle assessment (LCA) was used, next to green chemistry concepts, to compare the full environmental impacts of the epoxidation of a bio-based monomer, which can be used for the synthesis of vitrimers. On a laboratory scale, the synthesis of the monomer can either be done via a petrochemical route or via an enzymatic reaction pathway. Both reaction pathways were initially optimized to minimize the impact of suboptimal routes on the sustainability evaluation. The subsequent assessment of the enzymatic routes shows lower impact factors for most criteria compared to the petrochemical routes. A significant drawback of the enzymatic reaction, however, is its electricity consumption. The yields of the respective reactions also proved to be crucial; realistic changes in yields revealed the petrochemical reaction to be more sustainable in some cases. LCA is therefore a valuable tool for the preliminary evaluation of the developed synthesis pathways and to identify the critical adjustments needed to increase the sustainability of each reaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":149,"journal":{"name":"ChemSusChem","volume":" ","pages":"e202402248"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ChemSusChem","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.202402248","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Life cycle assessment (LCA) was used, next to green chemistry concepts, to compare the full environmental impacts of the epoxidation of a bio-based monomer, which can be used for the synthesis of vitrimers. On a laboratory scale, the synthesis of the monomer can either be done via a petrochemical route or via an enzymatic reaction pathway. Both reaction pathways were initially optimized to minimize the impact of suboptimal routes on the sustainability evaluation. The subsequent assessment of the enzymatic routes shows lower impact factors for most criteria compared to the petrochemical routes. A significant drawback of the enzymatic reaction, however, is its electricity consumption. The yields of the respective reactions also proved to be crucial; realistic changes in yields revealed the petrochemical reaction to be more sustainable in some cases. LCA is therefore a valuable tool for the preliminary evaluation of the developed synthesis pathways and to identify the critical adjustments needed to increase the sustainability of each reaction.

酶促单体合成的可持续性:通过生命周期评价对石化和酶促烯烃环氧化反应的比较评价。
生命周期评价(LCA)与绿色化学概念一起被用于比较生物基单体的环氧化对环境的全面影响,这些单体可用于合成玻璃体。在实验室规模上,单体的合成可以通过石化路线或通过酶反应途径完成。首先对两种反应路径进行优化,使次优路径对可持续性评价的影响最小化。随后对酶途径的评估表明,与石化途径相比,大多数标准的影响因素较低。然而,酶促反应的一个显著缺点是它的电力消耗。各自反应的产率也被证明是至关重要的;产率的实际变化表明,石化反应在某些情况下更具可持续性。因此,LCA是初步评价已开发的合成途径和确定增加每种反应的可持续性所需的关键调整的宝贵工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ChemSusChem
ChemSusChem 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
15.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
555
审稿时长
1.8 months
期刊介绍: ChemSusChem Impact Factor (2016): 7.226 Scope: Interdisciplinary journal Focuses on research at the interface of chemistry and sustainability Features the best research on sustainability and energy Areas Covered: Chemistry Materials Science Chemical Engineering Biotechnology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信