Exploring and validating associations between six systemic inflammatory indices and ischemic stroke in a middle-aged and old Chinese population

Abstract

Background

Inflammation and maladaptive immune mechanisms have been substantiated as integral components in the critical pathological processes of the injury cascade in ischemic stroke (IS). This study aimed to explore the associations between six systemic inflammatory indices and IS in a Chinese population.

Methods

This was a case-control study based on the retrospective review of electronic medical records from two hospitals in Shandong Province, China. Systemic inflammatory indices, including the systemic inflammation response index (SIRI), systemic immune inflammation index (SII), pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV), neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and lymphocyte monocyte ratio (LMR), were calculated. Logistic regression models and classification analyses were employed to evaluate associations and discriminatory abilities.

Results

In total, 9392 participants aged 40–83 years old were included in the discovery (3620 pairs of IS-present cases and healthy controls) and validation (1076 pairs of IS-present cases and IS-absent controls with IS mimics) datasets. After adjusting for potential confounding factors, IS was found to be associated with all six systemic indices in the discovery dataset, including SIRI (odd ratio [OR] 8.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 7.48–10.33), SII (1.03, 1.01–1.04), PIV (1.01, 1.01–1.01), NLR (2.23, 2.08–2.39), PLR (1.01, 1.01–1.01), and LMR (0.77, 0.75–0.78). Notably, only LMR exhibited significant associations with IS in both discovery and validation datasets (0.88, 0.83–0.93), suggesting an independent protective role of this index. SIRI, SII, PIV, NLR, and LMR showed good discriminative ability between IS patients and healthy controls in the discovery dataset (AUCs > 0.70). However, they performed poorly in distinguishing IS patients from IS mimics in the validation dataset (AUCs < 0.60).

Conclusion

This study provides valuable insights into the associations between systemic inflammatory indices and IS, offering potential implications for risk stratification. While these inflammatory indices are potential indicators for distinguishing IS from healthy conditions, additional biomarkers may be needed when differentiating IS from other chronic inflammatory conditions in clinical practice.