An improved notion for the computation of strain ratio in equivalent linear site response

IF 3.8 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Rahul Sinha
{"title":"An improved notion for the computation of strain ratio in equivalent linear site response","authors":"Rahul Sinha","doi":"10.1007/s10518-024-02061-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The geotechnical engineering community widely uses the one-dimensional (1D) Equivalent Linear Site Response Analysis (EQLSRA). However, the literature review reveals that surface ground motion characteristics predicted employing EQLSRA are often overdamped, especially at high frequencies. Recent studies have pointed out that the algorithm used within EQLSRA for obtaining the Equivalent Shear Strain (ESS) is one of the primary reasons for its unsatisfactory performance. Usually, for a given strain time history, the corresponding ESS is taken as Strain Ratio (STR) times the absolute peak strain. Conventionally, a constant value (usually ranging from 0.40 to 0.75 and typically 0.65) is manually set as STR. Though ESS plays a pivotal role in EQLSRA, not much attention has been given to the estimation of STR. This work aims to resolve such issues. Here, a new notion for the computation of STR is proposed, which can be easily integrated within EQLSRA. The coined idea takes into account the frequency content and intensity in the induced seismic strain waveform for the determination of STR. The suitability of the modified EQLSRA (mod-EQLSRA) incorporating the proposed technique of STR calculation is tested with the help of 15 Kiban Kyoshin Network (KiK-net) stations and 110 ground motions. It is found that the average absolute error in the surface Peak Horizontal Acceleration (PHA) predicted employing the mod-EQLSRA reduces by approximately 54% when compared to that estimated via the traditional EQLSRA.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9364,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","volume":"23 1","pages":"53 - 82"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-024-02061-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The geotechnical engineering community widely uses the one-dimensional (1D) Equivalent Linear Site Response Analysis (EQLSRA). However, the literature review reveals that surface ground motion characteristics predicted employing EQLSRA are often overdamped, especially at high frequencies. Recent studies have pointed out that the algorithm used within EQLSRA for obtaining the Equivalent Shear Strain (ESS) is one of the primary reasons for its unsatisfactory performance. Usually, for a given strain time history, the corresponding ESS is taken as Strain Ratio (STR) times the absolute peak strain. Conventionally, a constant value (usually ranging from 0.40 to 0.75 and typically 0.65) is manually set as STR. Though ESS plays a pivotal role in EQLSRA, not much attention has been given to the estimation of STR. This work aims to resolve such issues. Here, a new notion for the computation of STR is proposed, which can be easily integrated within EQLSRA. The coined idea takes into account the frequency content and intensity in the induced seismic strain waveform for the determination of STR. The suitability of the modified EQLSRA (mod-EQLSRA) incorporating the proposed technique of STR calculation is tested with the help of 15 Kiban Kyoshin Network (KiK-net) stations and 110 ground motions. It is found that the average absolute error in the surface Peak Horizontal Acceleration (PHA) predicted employing the mod-EQLSRA reduces by approximately 54% when compared to that estimated via the traditional EQLSRA.

Abstract Image

等效线性场地响应中应变比计算的改进概念
岩土工程界广泛采用一维等效线性场地响应分析方法(EQLSRA)。然而,文献综述表明,利用EQLSRA预测的地面地面运动特征往往是过阻尼的,特别是在高频时。近年来的研究指出,等效剪切应变(ESS)在EQLSRA中使用的算法是其性能不理想的主要原因之一。通常,对于给定的应变时程,对应的ESS取应变比(STR)乘以绝对峰值应变。传统的STR是手动设置一个恒定值(通常为0.40 - 0.75,通常为0.65)。虽然ESS在EQLSRA中起着关键作用,但对于STR的估计却没有得到太多的关注。本文旨在解决这一问题。在此基础上,提出了一种新的STR计算方法,可以方便地集成到EQLSRA中。本文利用15个KiK-net台站和110个地面运动数据,验证了采用上述STR计算方法的改进EQLSRA (mod-EQLSRA)的适用性。结果表明,与传统的EQLSRA方法相比,采用该方法预测的地表峰值水平加速度(PHA)的平均绝对误差降低了约54%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
19.60%
发文量
263
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering presents original, peer-reviewed papers on research related to the broad spectrum of earthquake engineering. The journal offers a forum for presentation and discussion of such matters as European damaging earthquakes, new developments in earthquake regulations, and national policies applied after major seismic events, including strengthening of existing buildings. Coverage includes seismic hazard studies and methods for mitigation of risk; earthquake source mechanism and strong motion characterization and their use for engineering applications; geological and geotechnical site conditions under earthquake excitations; cyclic behavior of soils; analysis and design of earth structures and foundations under seismic conditions; zonation and microzonation methodologies; earthquake scenarios and vulnerability assessments; earthquake codes and improvements, and much more. This is the Official Publication of the European Association for Earthquake Engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信