Achieving maximum strength in oak wood (Quercus robur, L.) bonding: techniques for surface preparation and adhesive application

IF 2.4 3区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY
Tomislav Gržan, Andrija Novosel, Vedrana Špada, Goran Mihulja, Vjekoslav Živković
{"title":"Achieving maximum strength in oak wood (Quercus robur, L.) bonding: techniques for surface preparation and adhesive application","authors":"Tomislav Gržan,&nbsp;Andrija Novosel,&nbsp;Vedrana Špada,&nbsp;Goran Mihulja,&nbsp;Vjekoslav Živković","doi":"10.1007/s00107-024-02179-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The growing use of wood in construction, driven by architectural trends favouring smaller cross sections, often compromises the material's physical and mechanical properties, especially in hardwoods like oak, which are prone to instability and moisture-related deformations. To counteract these issues, researchers have developed reinforced wood products that incorporate materials such as steel, aluminium, carbon fibre reinforced polymer (CFRP), glass fibre reinforced polymer (GFRP), and basalt fibres, which enhance strength and stability while reducing dimensional changes. Despite these advances, there is limited research on optimal bonding techniques, particularly surface preparation, which is crucial for effective gluing. To address this gap, this study aims to determine the most suitable mechanical surface preparation and adhesive to achieve satisfactory gluing of oak to oak. Understanding the optimal surface preparation and bonding techniques is a crucial first step before exploring the incorporation of nonwood implants in the next phase of research. Therefore, this study investigates the influence of three surface machining methods (planing, sanding, and face milling) on the performance of bonded Slavonian oak joints (<i>Quercus robur</i>, L.) in dry and artificially aged state (AA). The various machined surfaces were tested using five adhesives: polyvinyl acetate (PVAC), 1k polyurethane (PUR1), fibre-reinforced polyurethane (PUR2), 2k polyurethane (PUR3), and epoxy adhesive (ER). The surface properties of the wood and the bonding properties of the glued wooden joints were measured. The wetting angle was tested according to EN 828, the surface energy was calculated according to the Wu and OWRK methods, while the compressive shear strength test samples were prepared and tested according to the ISO 6238 standard in the dry and AA state. Visual designation of the main failure patterns and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of adhesive line integrity and adhesive penetration were also used to evaluate the joint bonding properties. The sanded surface results in the best wettability and the highest surface energy, which may be attributed to changes in surface morphology and structure of chemical components on the wood surface. The strength of PVAc glued joints was affected only by different machining, ER and PUR1 were affected by different machining and/or by AA, while PUR2 and PUR3 were affected neither by different machining nor by AA. PUR types of adhesives have proven to be the most suitable for bonding moisture-resistant face-milled, planed, or sanded joints.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":550,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Wood and Wood Products","volume":"83 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Wood and Wood Products","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00107-024-02179-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The growing use of wood in construction, driven by architectural trends favouring smaller cross sections, often compromises the material's physical and mechanical properties, especially in hardwoods like oak, which are prone to instability and moisture-related deformations. To counteract these issues, researchers have developed reinforced wood products that incorporate materials such as steel, aluminium, carbon fibre reinforced polymer (CFRP), glass fibre reinforced polymer (GFRP), and basalt fibres, which enhance strength and stability while reducing dimensional changes. Despite these advances, there is limited research on optimal bonding techniques, particularly surface preparation, which is crucial for effective gluing. To address this gap, this study aims to determine the most suitable mechanical surface preparation and adhesive to achieve satisfactory gluing of oak to oak. Understanding the optimal surface preparation and bonding techniques is a crucial first step before exploring the incorporation of nonwood implants in the next phase of research. Therefore, this study investigates the influence of three surface machining methods (planing, sanding, and face milling) on the performance of bonded Slavonian oak joints (Quercus robur, L.) in dry and artificially aged state (AA). The various machined surfaces were tested using five adhesives: polyvinyl acetate (PVAC), 1k polyurethane (PUR1), fibre-reinforced polyurethane (PUR2), 2k polyurethane (PUR3), and epoxy adhesive (ER). The surface properties of the wood and the bonding properties of the glued wooden joints were measured. The wetting angle was tested according to EN 828, the surface energy was calculated according to the Wu and OWRK methods, while the compressive shear strength test samples were prepared and tested according to the ISO 6238 standard in the dry and AA state. Visual designation of the main failure patterns and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of adhesive line integrity and adhesive penetration were also used to evaluate the joint bonding properties. The sanded surface results in the best wettability and the highest surface energy, which may be attributed to changes in surface morphology and structure of chemical components on the wood surface. The strength of PVAc glued joints was affected only by different machining, ER and PUR1 were affected by different machining and/or by AA, while PUR2 and PUR3 were affected neither by different machining nor by AA. PUR types of adhesives have proven to be the most suitable for bonding moisture-resistant face-milled, planed, or sanded joints.

Abstract Image

达到最大强度的橡木(栎木,L.)粘接:表面处理和粘合剂应用技术
在建筑趋势的推动下,越来越多的木材在建筑中的使用,往往会损害材料的物理和机械性能,特别是像橡木这样的硬木,容易不稳定和与潮湿有关的变形。为了解决这些问题,研究人员开发了增强木制品,其中包括钢、铝、碳纤维增强聚合物(CFRP)、玻璃纤维增强聚合物(GFRP)和玄武岩纤维等材料,这些材料可以提高强度和稳定性,同时减少尺寸变化。尽管取得了这些进展,但对最佳粘合技术的研究仍然有限,特别是对有效粘合至关重要的表面处理。为了解决这一差距,本研究旨在确定最合适的机械表面处理和粘合剂,以实现橡木与橡木的满意粘合。了解最佳的表面制备和粘合技术是在下一阶段研究中探索非木材植入物结合的关键的第一步。因此,本研究研究了三种表面加工方法(刨、砂和铣削)对斯拉瓦尼亚橡木(Quercus robur, L.)焊接接头在干燥和人工老化状态(AA)下性能的影响。采用五种胶粘剂:聚醋酸乙烯酯(PVAC)、1k聚氨酯(PUR1)、纤维增强聚氨酯(PUR2)、2k聚氨酯(PUR3)和环氧胶粘剂(ER)对各种加工表面进行测试。测试了木材的表面性能和胶合接头的粘合性能。润湿角按EN 828测试,表面能按Wu和OWRK方法计算,抗剪强度试验试样按ISO 6238标准在干燥和AA状态下制备和测试。通过对主要失效模式的目测和胶粘剂线完整性和渗透度的扫描电镜(SEM)对接头的粘结性能进行了评价。经砂处理的木材表面润湿性最好,表面能最高,这可能是由于木材表面化学成分的表面形态和结构发生了变化。PVAc胶合接头的强度仅受不同加工方式的影响,ER和PUR1受不同加工方式和/或AA的影响,而PUR2和PUR3不受不同加工方式和AA的影响。PUR类型的粘合剂已被证明是最适合粘接防潮面铣,刨,或砂接头。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Wood and Wood Products
European Journal of Wood and Wood Products 工程技术-材料科学:纸与木材
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
124
审稿时长
6.0 months
期刊介绍: European Journal of Wood and Wood Products reports on original research and new developments in the field of wood and wood products and their biological, chemical, physical as well as mechanical and technological properties, processes and uses. Subjects range from roundwood to wood based products, composite materials and structural applications, with related jointing techniques. Moreover, it deals with wood as a chemical raw material, source of energy as well as with inter-disciplinary aspects of environmental assessment and international markets. European Journal of Wood and Wood Products aims at promoting international scientific communication and transfer of new technologies from research into practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信