Dear sceptics of patient engagement in research

The BMJ Pub Date : 2025-01-22 DOI:10.1136/bmj.r133
Dawn P Richards
{"title":"Dear sceptics of patient engagement in research","authors":"Dawn P Richards","doi":"10.1136/bmj.r133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dawn P Richards challenges some of the common objections to patient engagement in research I have been in a lot of spaces over the years where people were not convinced about patient engagement in research. They often feel that they already have enough to do, or that this is “yet another” hoop that funding agencies are requiring them to jump through. I am writing this for you. I am not entirely sure that I will change your mind, but hopefully I can get you to think about some of your objections and why patient engagement in research is generally a good thing. ### Patients are vulnerable in most systems Firstly, I would ask you to consider that patients are pretty much at the bottom of the pecking order in most situations or settings. In healthcare, they are beholden to healthcare providers and are obliged to behave like a “good patient.”` A good patient asks questions gently or strategically (or not at all!), avoids being too “difficult,” and does not challenge the professionals. Never mind that patients live 24/7 with their chronic condition or the health consequences of an acute illness, and that they manage as best …","PeriodicalId":22388,"journal":{"name":"The BMJ","volume":"81 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The BMJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.r133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dawn P Richards challenges some of the common objections to patient engagement in research I have been in a lot of spaces over the years where people were not convinced about patient engagement in research. They often feel that they already have enough to do, or that this is “yet another” hoop that funding agencies are requiring them to jump through. I am writing this for you. I am not entirely sure that I will change your mind, but hopefully I can get you to think about some of your objections and why patient engagement in research is generally a good thing. ### Patients are vulnerable in most systems Firstly, I would ask you to consider that patients are pretty much at the bottom of the pecking order in most situations or settings. In healthcare, they are beholden to healthcare providers and are obliged to behave like a “good patient.”` A good patient asks questions gently or strategically (or not at all!), avoids being too “difficult,” and does not challenge the professionals. Never mind that patients live 24/7 with their chronic condition or the health consequences of an acute illness, and that they manage as best …
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信