What black women in medicine stand to lose in the US’s war on diversity, equity, and inclusion

The BMJ Pub Date : 2025-01-22 DOI:10.1136/bmj.r134
Naeema Hopkins-Kotb
{"title":"What black women in medicine stand to lose in the US’s war on diversity, equity, and inclusion","authors":"Naeema Hopkins-Kotb","doi":"10.1136/bmj.r134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rise of anti-DEI legislation and rhetoric threatens representation in the medical workforce and patient outcomes, says Naeema Hopkins-Kotb I still remember receiving my first letter from Harvard Medical School—and no, it wasn’t an acceptance letter. I was a student in the thick of pre-med requirements, trying to decide on the next institution I would trust with my dream of becoming a doctor. The letter was from Harvard’s Office of Recruitment and Multicultural Affairs, with information to help students like me, who are under-represented in medicine, apply to medical school. I revisited the list of medical schools I was applying to and added Harvard. Initiatives like this one, which are aimed at promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI), made it clear that I am needed and belong in medicine as a black woman. Today, DEI is under attack—and the effects of anti-DEI rhetoric and legislation on medicine will further marginalise black women, both seeking and providing healthcare, for years to come. In June 2023, the US Supreme Court ruled that race can no longer be a factor that influences students’ admission to university, effectively ending affirmative action..1 …","PeriodicalId":22388,"journal":{"name":"The BMJ","volume":"103 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The BMJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.r134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rise of anti-DEI legislation and rhetoric threatens representation in the medical workforce and patient outcomes, says Naeema Hopkins-Kotb I still remember receiving my first letter from Harvard Medical School—and no, it wasn’t an acceptance letter. I was a student in the thick of pre-med requirements, trying to decide on the next institution I would trust with my dream of becoming a doctor. The letter was from Harvard’s Office of Recruitment and Multicultural Affairs, with information to help students like me, who are under-represented in medicine, apply to medical school. I revisited the list of medical schools I was applying to and added Harvard. Initiatives like this one, which are aimed at promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI), made it clear that I am needed and belong in medicine as a black woman. Today, DEI is under attack—and the effects of anti-DEI rhetoric and legislation on medicine will further marginalise black women, both seeking and providing healthcare, for years to come. In June 2023, the US Supreme Court ruled that race can no longer be a factor that influences students’ admission to university, effectively ending affirmative action..1 …
纳伊玛-霍普金斯-科特布(Naeema Hopkins-Kotb)说:"反DEI立法和言论的兴起威胁着医疗队伍的代表性和患者的治疗效果。 我还记得收到哈佛医学院的第一封信--不,那不是一封录取通知书。当时,我还是一名学生,正在努力学习医学预科课程,试图决定下一所值得我信任的院校,以实现我的医生梦想。这封信是哈佛大学招生和多元文化事务办公室寄来的,上面的信息旨在帮助像我这样在医学界代表性不足的学生申请医学院。我重新查看了我要申请的医学院名单,并添加了哈佛大学。像这样旨在促进多样性、公平性和包容性(DEI)的举措让我清楚地认识到,作为一名黑人女性,我在医学界是被需要的,也是有归属感的。如今,多元化、公平与包容(DEI)正在受到攻击,而反多元化、公平与包容的言论和立法对医学的影响将在未来数年进一步边缘化黑人女性,无论是寻求医疗保健服务的黑人女性还是提供医疗保健服务的黑人女性。2023 年 6 月,美国最高法院裁定,种族不再是影响学生进入大学的一个因素,这实际上终结了平权法案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信