Root microbes can improve plant tolerance to insect damage: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

IF 4.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Ecology Pub Date : 2025-01-22 DOI:10.1002/ecy.4502
Emily Tronson, Laramy Enders
{"title":"Root microbes can improve plant tolerance to insect damage: A systematic review and meta‐analysis","authors":"Emily Tronson, Laramy Enders","doi":"10.1002/ecy.4502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To limit damage from insect herbivores, plants rely on a blend of defensive mechanisms that includes partnerships with beneficial microbes, particularly those inhabiting roots. While ample evidence exists for microbially mediated resistance responses that directly target insects through changing phytotoxin and volatile profiles, we know surprisingly little about the microbial underpinnings of plant tolerance. Tolerance defenses counteract insect damage via shifts in plant physiology that reallocate resources to fuel compensatory growth, improve photosynthetic efficiency, and reduce oxidative stress. Despite being a powerful mitigator of insect damage, tolerance remains an understudied realm of plant defenses. Here, we propose a novel conceptual framework that can be broadly applied across study systems to characterize microbial impacts on expression of tolerance defenses. We conducted a systematic review of studies quantifying the impact of rhizosphere microbial inoculants on plant tolerance to herbivory based on several measures—biomass, oxidative stress mitigation, or photosynthesis. We identified 40 studies, most of which focused on chewing herbivores (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 31) and plant growth parameters (e.g., biomass). Next, we performed a meta‐analysis investigating the impact of microbial inoculants on plant tolerance to herbivory, which was measured via differences in plant biomass, and compared across key microbe, insect, and plant traits. Thirty‐five papers comprising 113 observations were included in this meta‐analysis, with effect sizes (Hedges' <jats:italic>d</jats:italic>) ranging from −4.67 (susceptible) to 18.38 (overcompensation). Overall, microbial inoculants significantly reduce the cost of herbivory via plant growth promotion, with overcompensation and compensation comprising 25% of observations of microbial‐mediated tolerance. The grand mean effect size 0.99 [0.49; 1.49] indicates that the addition of a microbial inoculant increased plant biomass by ~1 SD under herbivore stress, thus improving tolerance. This effect was influenced most by microbial attributes, including functional guild and total soil community diversity. Overall, results highlight the need for additional investigation of microbially mediated plant tolerance, particularly in sap‐feeding insects and across a more comprehensive range of tolerance mechanisms. Such attention would round out our current understanding of anti‐herbivore plant defenses, offer insight into the underlying mechanisms that promote resilience to insect stress, and inform the application of microbial biotechnology to support sustainable agricultural practices.","PeriodicalId":11484,"journal":{"name":"Ecology","volume":"74 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.4502","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To limit damage from insect herbivores, plants rely on a blend of defensive mechanisms that includes partnerships with beneficial microbes, particularly those inhabiting roots. While ample evidence exists for microbially mediated resistance responses that directly target insects through changing phytotoxin and volatile profiles, we know surprisingly little about the microbial underpinnings of plant tolerance. Tolerance defenses counteract insect damage via shifts in plant physiology that reallocate resources to fuel compensatory growth, improve photosynthetic efficiency, and reduce oxidative stress. Despite being a powerful mitigator of insect damage, tolerance remains an understudied realm of plant defenses. Here, we propose a novel conceptual framework that can be broadly applied across study systems to characterize microbial impacts on expression of tolerance defenses. We conducted a systematic review of studies quantifying the impact of rhizosphere microbial inoculants on plant tolerance to herbivory based on several measures—biomass, oxidative stress mitigation, or photosynthesis. We identified 40 studies, most of which focused on chewing herbivores (n = 31) and plant growth parameters (e.g., biomass). Next, we performed a meta‐analysis investigating the impact of microbial inoculants on plant tolerance to herbivory, which was measured via differences in plant biomass, and compared across key microbe, insect, and plant traits. Thirty‐five papers comprising 113 observations were included in this meta‐analysis, with effect sizes (Hedges' d) ranging from −4.67 (susceptible) to 18.38 (overcompensation). Overall, microbial inoculants significantly reduce the cost of herbivory via plant growth promotion, with overcompensation and compensation comprising 25% of observations of microbial‐mediated tolerance. The grand mean effect size 0.99 [0.49; 1.49] indicates that the addition of a microbial inoculant increased plant biomass by ~1 SD under herbivore stress, thus improving tolerance. This effect was influenced most by microbial attributes, including functional guild and total soil community diversity. Overall, results highlight the need for additional investigation of microbially mediated plant tolerance, particularly in sap‐feeding insects and across a more comprehensive range of tolerance mechanisms. Such attention would round out our current understanding of anti‐herbivore plant defenses, offer insight into the underlying mechanisms that promote resilience to insect stress, and inform the application of microbial biotechnology to support sustainable agricultural practices.
根系微生物可以提高植物对昆虫伤害的耐受性:一项系统综述和荟萃分析
为了限制昆虫食草动物的危害,植物依靠多种防御机制,其中包括与有益微生物(尤其是栖息在根部的微生物)的合作。虽然有大量证据表明,微生物介导的抗性反应通过改变植物毒素和挥发性成分直接针对昆虫,但我们对植物耐受性的微生物基础却知之甚少,令人惊讶。耐受性防御措施通过植物生理机能的变化来抵御昆虫的伤害,这种变化会重新分配资源以促进补偿性生长、提高光合效率并减少氧化应激。尽管耐受性是减轻昆虫危害的有力手段,但它仍然是植物防御能力中一个未被充分研究的领域。在此,我们提出了一个新的概念框架,可广泛应用于各种研究系统,以描述微生物对抗逆性防御表达的影响。我们根据生物量、氧化应激缓解或光合作用等几项指标,对量化根瘤微生物接种剂对植物耐受草食性影响的研究进行了系统回顾。我们确定了 40 项研究,其中大部分侧重于咀嚼食草动物(n = 31)和植物生长参数(如生物量)。接下来,我们进行了一项荟萃分析,研究微生物接种剂对植物耐受草食性的影响,这种影响通过植物生物量的差异来衡量,并在关键微生物、昆虫和植物性状之间进行比较。这项荟萃分析包括 35 篇论文、113 项观察结果,效应大小(Hedges'd)从-4.67(易感性)到 18.38(过度补偿)不等。总体而言,微生物接种剂通过促进植物生长显著降低了食草动物的成本,在微生物介导的耐受性观察中,过度补偿和补偿占 25%。总平均效应大小为 0.99 [0.49; 1.49],表明在食草动物胁迫下,添加微生物接种剂可使植物生物量增加约 1 SD,从而提高耐受性。这种效应受微生物属性的影响最大,包括功能区和土壤群落总多样性。总之,研究结果凸显了对微生物介导的植物耐受性进行更多研究的必要性,尤其是对食液昆虫和更全面的耐受机制的研究。这种关注将完善我们目前对植物抗食草动物防御能力的认识,深入了解促进昆虫抗逆性的潜在机制,并为微生物生物技术的应用提供信息,以支持可持续农业实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecology
Ecology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
332
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Ecology publishes articles that report on the basic elements of ecological research. Emphasis is placed on concise, clear articles documenting important ecological phenomena. The journal publishes a broad array of research that includes a rapidly expanding envelope of subject matter, techniques, approaches, and concepts: paleoecology through present-day phenomena; evolutionary, population, physiological, community, and ecosystem ecology, as well as biogeochemistry; inclusive of descriptive, comparative, experimental, mathematical, statistical, and interdisciplinary approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信