{"title":"Physical Protection of Soil Carbon Stocks Under Regenerative Agriculture","authors":"Sam G. Keenor, Rebekah Lee, Brian J. Reid","doi":"10.5194/egusphere-2024-4029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<strong>Abstract.</strong> Regenerative agriculture is emerging as a strategy for carbon sequestration and climate change mitigation. However, for sequestration efforts to be successful, long-term stabilisation of Soil Organic Carbon (SOC) is needed. This can be achieved either through the uplift in recalcitrant carbon stocks, and/or through physical protection and occlusion of carbon within stable soil aggregates. In this research, soils from blackcurrant fields under regenerative management (0 to 7 years) were analysed with respect to: soil bulk density (SBD), aggregate fractionation (water stable aggregates vs. non-water stable aggregates (WSA and NWSA respectively)), soil carbon content, and carbon stability (recalcitrant vs. labile carbon). From this, long term carbon sequestration potential was calculated from both recalcitrant and physically occluded carbon stocks (stabilised carbon). Results indicated favourable shifts in the proportion of NWSA:WSA with time. This ratio increasing from 27.6 % : 5.8 % (control soil) to 12.6 % : 16.0 % (alley soil), and 16.1 % : 14.4 % (bush soil) after 7 years. While no significant (p ≥ 0.05)) changes in recalcitrant carbon stocks were observed after 7 years, labile carbon stocks increased significantly (p ≤ 0.05) from 10.44 t C ha<sup>-1</sup> to 13.87 t C ha<sup>-1</sup>. As a result, total sequesterable carbon (<em>stabilised carbon</em>) increased by 1.7 t C ha<sup>-1</sup> over the 7 year period, due to the occlusion and protection of this labile carbon stock within WSA fraction. This research provides valuable insights into the mechanisms of soil carbon stabilisation under regenerative agriculture practices and highlights the importance of soil aggregates in physically protecting carbon net-gains.","PeriodicalId":48610,"journal":{"name":"Soil","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-4029","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract. Regenerative agriculture is emerging as a strategy for carbon sequestration and climate change mitigation. However, for sequestration efforts to be successful, long-term stabilisation of Soil Organic Carbon (SOC) is needed. This can be achieved either through the uplift in recalcitrant carbon stocks, and/or through physical protection and occlusion of carbon within stable soil aggregates. In this research, soils from blackcurrant fields under regenerative management (0 to 7 years) were analysed with respect to: soil bulk density (SBD), aggregate fractionation (water stable aggregates vs. non-water stable aggregates (WSA and NWSA respectively)), soil carbon content, and carbon stability (recalcitrant vs. labile carbon). From this, long term carbon sequestration potential was calculated from both recalcitrant and physically occluded carbon stocks (stabilised carbon). Results indicated favourable shifts in the proportion of NWSA:WSA with time. This ratio increasing from 27.6 % : 5.8 % (control soil) to 12.6 % : 16.0 % (alley soil), and 16.1 % : 14.4 % (bush soil) after 7 years. While no significant (p ≥ 0.05)) changes in recalcitrant carbon stocks were observed after 7 years, labile carbon stocks increased significantly (p ≤ 0.05) from 10.44 t C ha-1 to 13.87 t C ha-1. As a result, total sequesterable carbon (stabilised carbon) increased by 1.7 t C ha-1 over the 7 year period, due to the occlusion and protection of this labile carbon stock within WSA fraction. This research provides valuable insights into the mechanisms of soil carbon stabilisation under regenerative agriculture practices and highlights the importance of soil aggregates in physically protecting carbon net-gains.
摘要。再生农业正在成为碳封存和减缓气候变化的一种战略。然而,为了使封存工作取得成功,需要土壤有机碳(SOC)的长期稳定。这可以通过提高顽固性碳储量和/或通过物理保护和封闭稳定土壤团聚体中的碳来实现。在本研究中,对再生管理下(0 ~ 7年)黑加仑田的土壤进行了土壤容重(SBD)、团聚体分异(水稳定团聚体与非水稳定团聚体(分别为WSA和NWSA))、土壤碳含量和碳稳定性(顽固性碳与不稳定碳)的分析。据此,计算了顽固碳储量和物理封存碳储量(稳定碳)的长期碳固存潜力。结果表明,随着时间的推移,NWSA:WSA的比例发生了有利的变化。7年后,这一比例从对照土的27.6%:5.8%增加到小巷土的12.6%:16.0%,灌木土的16.1%:14.4%。7年后,顽固性碳储量变化不显著(p≥0.05),而不稳定碳储量从10.44 t C ha-1显著增加到13.87 t C ha-1 (p≤0.05)。结果,在7年的时间里,由于在WSA部分中这种不稳定碳储量的遮挡和保护,总可固碳(稳定碳)增加了1.7 t C ha-1。这项研究为再生农业实践下土壤碳稳定的机制提供了有价值的见解,并强调了土壤团聚体在物理保护碳净收益方面的重要性。
SoilAgricultural and Biological Sciences-Soil Science
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
2.90%
发文量
44
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍:
SOIL is an international scientific journal dedicated to the publication and discussion of high-quality research in the field of soil system sciences.
SOIL is at the interface between the atmosphere, lithosphere, hydrosphere, and biosphere. SOIL publishes scientific research that contributes to understanding the soil system and its interaction with humans and the entire Earth system. The scope of the journal includes all topics that fall within the study of soil science as a discipline, with an emphasis on studies that integrate soil science with other sciences (hydrology, agronomy, socio-economics, health sciences, atmospheric sciences, etc.).