Measuring Circularity in the Construction Industry: A Systematic Literature Review from the Stakeholder Perspective

IF 9.7 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Luyuan Peng, Wen-Jun Cao
{"title":"Measuring Circularity in the Construction Industry: A Systematic Literature Review from the Stakeholder Perspective","authors":"Luyuan Peng, Wen-Jun Cao","doi":"10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.144805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The implementation of the circular economy (CE) in the construction industry has become a feasible solution for achieving sustainable development while reducing environmental impact. It is essential to systematically monitor, manage, and evaluate circularity within the construction industry based on the needs and interests of stakeholders, as this can provide evidence for circular practices. However, the integration of CE increases complexities in the stakeholder network of the construction industry. Many stakeholders lack clarity about their roles, requirements, and aspirations in circular projects, leading to ineffective, hesitant, and ambiguous utilization of various circular measurement methods. To address those problems, this paper adopts a systematic literature review approach to conduct a comprehensive and critical review of measuring circularity from a stakeholder perspective. The paper categorizes stakeholders into 7 key groups and identifies their needs and dilemmas at specific stages of the circular project life cycle. Additionally, this study reviews the current development of circularity measurements at different stages of the circular project life cycle and discusses how well they align with stakeholders' needs and dilemmas. Finally, this study finds that there have been various attempts, but several essential prerequisites for comprehensive measurement are missing or incomplete. Several recommendations for measuring circularity that align more closely with stakeholder needs and address their current dilemmas are proposed. These findings are intended to enhance the evaluation, regulation, and oversight of CE in the construction industry, as well as to promote CE implementation.","PeriodicalId":349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cleaner Production","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cleaner Production","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.144805","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The implementation of the circular economy (CE) in the construction industry has become a feasible solution for achieving sustainable development while reducing environmental impact. It is essential to systematically monitor, manage, and evaluate circularity within the construction industry based on the needs and interests of stakeholders, as this can provide evidence for circular practices. However, the integration of CE increases complexities in the stakeholder network of the construction industry. Many stakeholders lack clarity about their roles, requirements, and aspirations in circular projects, leading to ineffective, hesitant, and ambiguous utilization of various circular measurement methods. To address those problems, this paper adopts a systematic literature review approach to conduct a comprehensive and critical review of measuring circularity from a stakeholder perspective. The paper categorizes stakeholders into 7 key groups and identifies their needs and dilemmas at specific stages of the circular project life cycle. Additionally, this study reviews the current development of circularity measurements at different stages of the circular project life cycle and discusses how well they align with stakeholders' needs and dilemmas. Finally, this study finds that there have been various attempts, but several essential prerequisites for comprehensive measurement are missing or incomplete. Several recommendations for measuring circularity that align more closely with stakeholder needs and address their current dilemmas are proposed. These findings are intended to enhance the evaluation, regulation, and oversight of CE in the construction industry, as well as to promote CE implementation.
建筑业循环度测量:基于利益相关者视角的系统文献综述
在建筑行业实施循环经济已成为实现可持续发展同时减少环境影响的可行解决方案。基于利益相关者的需求和利益,系统地监测、管理和评估建筑行业的循环性是至关重要的,因为这可以为循环实践提供证据。然而,CE的整合增加了建筑行业利益相关者网络的复杂性。许多涉众对他们在循环项目中的角色、需求和愿望缺乏清晰的认识,导致对各种循环度量方法的无效、犹豫和模棱两可的使用。为了解决这些问题,本文采用系统的文献综述方法,从利益相关者的角度对测量循环度进行全面和批判性的回顾。本文将干系人分为7个关键群体,并确定了他们在循环项目生命周期的特定阶段的需求和困境。此外,本研究回顾了在循环项目生命周期的不同阶段循环度量的当前发展,并讨论了它们如何与利益相关者的需求和困境相一致。最后,本研究发现,虽然有各种尝试,但缺乏或不完整的几个必要的先决条件进行全面的测量。本文提出了几项测量循环的建议,这些建议与利益相关者的需求更紧密地结合起来,并解决了他们当前的困境。这些研究结果旨在加强评估、规管和监督建造业的行政执行,以及推动行政执行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cleaner Production
Journal of Cleaner Production 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
9.00%
发文量
4720
审稿时长
111 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cleaner Production is an international, transdisciplinary journal that addresses and discusses theoretical and practical Cleaner Production, Environmental, and Sustainability issues. It aims to help societies become more sustainable by focusing on the concept of 'Cleaner Production', which aims at preventing waste production and increasing efficiencies in energy, water, resources, and human capital use. The journal serves as a platform for corporations, governments, education institutions, regions, and societies to engage in discussions and research related to Cleaner Production, environmental, and sustainability practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信