Return to Sport After Distal Biceps Tendon Repair: A Systematic Review.

Peter Boufadel,Mohammad Daher,Ryan Lopez,Mohamad Y Fares,Jad Lawand,Adam Z Khan,Joseph A Abboud
{"title":"Return to Sport After Distal Biceps Tendon Repair: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Peter Boufadel,Mohammad Daher,Ryan Lopez,Mohamad Y Fares,Jad Lawand,Adam Z Khan,Joseph A Abboud","doi":"10.1177/03635465241295618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nRuptures of the distal biceps tendon (DBT) can affect the range of motion and strength of the elbow, raising concerns for patients seeking to restore normal function and engage in their regular activities, particularly returning to previous levels of sport participation.\r\n\r\nPURPOSE\r\nTo characterize and assess the rate and timing of return to sport (RTS) after DBT repair.\r\n\r\nSTUDY DESIGN\r\nSystematic review; Level of evidence, 4.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nPubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar (pages 1-20) were searched from database inception to December 6, 2023 for clinical studies reporting RTS outcomes after DBT repair. The extracted data consisted of patient characteristics; information on the incision approach, fixation method, and rehabilitation protocol; and outcome data including RTS rates, patient-reported outcome measure scores, and complications.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nA total of 42 studies, including 1093 patients (1100 elbows), met the inclusion criteria. The mean age of patients was 44.9 years, and 99.2% of patients were male. The mean follow-up time was 31.5 months. Ruptures were acute in 87.6% of cases, the dominant arm was injured in 64.9%, and the cause of the injury was sport related in 43.5%. The overall RTS rate was 91.5%, with 85.2% of patients returning to preinjury levels or higher, at a mean time of 6.3 months. Patients had excellent functional outcomes, irrespective of the incision approach or fixation method, although trends associated with a higher RTS rate were observed with bone tunnel fixation, ≤2 weeks of postoperative immobilization, early initiation of active range of motion postoperatively, and initiation of strengthening at ≤10 weeks. Single-incision repair had higher rates of nerve-related complications and reruptures compared with double-incision repair, and cortical button fixation had a higher rate of nerve-related complications among the fixation methods.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nThere was a high rate of RTS after DBT repair at 6 months postoperatively. A positive trend for RTS was observed with respect to rehabilitation protocols favoring earlier active mobility.","PeriodicalId":517411,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"15 1","pages":"3635465241295618"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465241295618","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Ruptures of the distal biceps tendon (DBT) can affect the range of motion and strength of the elbow, raising concerns for patients seeking to restore normal function and engage in their regular activities, particularly returning to previous levels of sport participation. PURPOSE To characterize and assess the rate and timing of return to sport (RTS) after DBT repair. STUDY DESIGN Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar (pages 1-20) were searched from database inception to December 6, 2023 for clinical studies reporting RTS outcomes after DBT repair. The extracted data consisted of patient characteristics; information on the incision approach, fixation method, and rehabilitation protocol; and outcome data including RTS rates, patient-reported outcome measure scores, and complications. RESULTS A total of 42 studies, including 1093 patients (1100 elbows), met the inclusion criteria. The mean age of patients was 44.9 years, and 99.2% of patients were male. The mean follow-up time was 31.5 months. Ruptures were acute in 87.6% of cases, the dominant arm was injured in 64.9%, and the cause of the injury was sport related in 43.5%. The overall RTS rate was 91.5%, with 85.2% of patients returning to preinjury levels or higher, at a mean time of 6.3 months. Patients had excellent functional outcomes, irrespective of the incision approach or fixation method, although trends associated with a higher RTS rate were observed with bone tunnel fixation, ≤2 weeks of postoperative immobilization, early initiation of active range of motion postoperatively, and initiation of strengthening at ≤10 weeks. Single-incision repair had higher rates of nerve-related complications and reruptures compared with double-incision repair, and cortical button fixation had a higher rate of nerve-related complications among the fixation methods. CONCLUSION There was a high rate of RTS after DBT repair at 6 months postoperatively. A positive trend for RTS was observed with respect to rehabilitation protocols favoring earlier active mobility.
二头肌远端肌腱修复后恢复运动:系统回顾。
背景:肱二头肌远端肌腱(DBT)破裂会影响肘关节的活动范围和力量,这引起了患者寻求恢复正常功能和参与常规活动的关注,特别是恢复到以前的运动参与水平。目的分析和评价DBT修复后的运动恢复率和时间。研究设计:系统评价;证据等级,4级。方法检索spubmed、Embase和谷歌Scholar(第1-20页)从数据库建立到2023年12月6日报告DBT修复后RTS结果的临床研究。提取的数据包括患者特征;关于切口入路、固定方法和康复方案的信息;结果数据包括RTS率、患者报告的结果测量评分和并发症。结果共42项研究,1093例患者(1100肘部)符合纳入标准。患者平均年龄44.9岁,男性占99.2%。平均随访31.5个月。急性破裂占87.6%,主臂损伤占64.9%,损伤原因与运动有关占43.5%。总体RTS率为91.5%,85.2%的患者恢复到损伤前水平或更高,平均时间为6.3个月。无论采用何种切口入路或固定方法,患者的功能结局都很好,尽管观察到骨隧道固定、术后≤2周固定、术后早期开始活动活动度以及≤10周开始加强与较高RTS率相关的趋势。与双切口修复术相比,单切口修复术的神经相关并发症和再破裂发生率较高,皮质钮扣固定术的神经相关并发症发生率较高。结论DBT修复术后6个月有较高的RTS发生率。在康复方案方面,观察到RTS的积极趋势,有利于早期的主动活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信