Harnessing ensemble Machine learning models for improved salinity prediction in large river basin scales

IF 5.9 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Mohamed F. Mahmoud, Mazdak Arabi, Shrideep Pallickara
{"title":"Harnessing ensemble Machine learning models for improved salinity prediction in large river basin scales","authors":"Mohamed F. Mahmoud, Mazdak Arabi, Shrideep Pallickara","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.132691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study develops a robust ensemble machine learning methodology for predicting average annual salinity by combining multiple machine learning algorithms. Salt concentration is a crucial water quality indicator, and salinity issues cost $300 million annually in the U.S. Irrigated agricultural lands in the Upper Colorado River Basin contribute excessively to dissolved solid loads despite covering less than 2% of the basin area. The economic impact and complex relationship between irrigation practices, groundwater dynamics, and salinity levels necessitate improved predictive capabilities at river basin scales. Using twenty years of data from 150 watersheds, eleven machine learning algorithms were evaluated through both random and spatial cross-validation approaches, with Extreme Gradient Boosting, Gradient Boosting, and Random Forest emerging as top performers. Bayesian Model Averaging and stacked generalization were employed to create ensemble models, demonstrating enhanced performance validity. The BMA ensemble achieved better spatial generalization compared to individual models while requiring significantly less computational resources than stacking. Model uncertainty analysis revealed that BMA provided the most stable predictions among all approaches. Soil electrical conductivity and calcium carbonate content emerged as the most important predictors, followed by river flow. The resulting spatially distributed predictions revealed distinct patterns in sulfate loads and concentrations across sub-basins, providing insights for targeted salinity management. This study demonstrates the effectiveness of ensemble machine learning approaches for robust salinity prediction while highlighting the importance of comprehensive uncertainty assessment and spatial validation in environmental modeling applications.","PeriodicalId":362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.132691","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study develops a robust ensemble machine learning methodology for predicting average annual salinity by combining multiple machine learning algorithms. Salt concentration is a crucial water quality indicator, and salinity issues cost $300 million annually in the U.S. Irrigated agricultural lands in the Upper Colorado River Basin contribute excessively to dissolved solid loads despite covering less than 2% of the basin area. The economic impact and complex relationship between irrigation practices, groundwater dynamics, and salinity levels necessitate improved predictive capabilities at river basin scales. Using twenty years of data from 150 watersheds, eleven machine learning algorithms were evaluated through both random and spatial cross-validation approaches, with Extreme Gradient Boosting, Gradient Boosting, and Random Forest emerging as top performers. Bayesian Model Averaging and stacked generalization were employed to create ensemble models, demonstrating enhanced performance validity. The BMA ensemble achieved better spatial generalization compared to individual models while requiring significantly less computational resources than stacking. Model uncertainty analysis revealed that BMA provided the most stable predictions among all approaches. Soil electrical conductivity and calcium carbonate content emerged as the most important predictors, followed by river flow. The resulting spatially distributed predictions revealed distinct patterns in sulfate loads and concentrations across sub-basins, providing insights for targeted salinity management. This study demonstrates the effectiveness of ensemble machine learning approaches for robust salinity prediction while highlighting the importance of comprehensive uncertainty assessment and spatial validation in environmental modeling applications.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Hydrology
Journal of Hydrology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
1309
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hydrology publishes original research papers and comprehensive reviews in all the subfields of the hydrological sciences including water based management and policy issues that impact on economics and society. These comprise, but are not limited to the physical, chemical, biogeochemical, stochastic and systems aspects of surface and groundwater hydrology, hydrometeorology and hydrogeology. Relevant topics incorporating the insights and methodologies of disciplines such as climatology, water resource systems, hydraulics, agrohydrology, geomorphology, soil science, instrumentation and remote sensing, civil and environmental engineering are included. Social science perspectives on hydrological problems such as resource and ecological economics, environmental sociology, psychology and behavioural science, management and policy analysis are also invited. Multi-and interdisciplinary analyses of hydrological problems are within scope. The science published in the Journal of Hydrology is relevant to catchment scales rather than exclusively to a local scale or site.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信