When does an extinction procedure lead to mere exposure effects and extinction of evaluative conditioning?

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Jasmin Richter , Jan R. Landwehr , Rolf Reber
{"title":"When does an extinction procedure lead to mere exposure effects and extinction of evaluative conditioning?","authors":"Jasmin Richter ,&nbsp;Jan R. Landwehr ,&nbsp;Rolf Reber","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2024.104715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Repeatedly presenting a neutral stimulus (conditioned stimulus, CS) together with a positive or negative stimulus (unconditioned stimulus, US) typically changes liking of the CS. An important question is whether a subsequent extinction phase where the CS is presented without the US extinguishes such evaluative conditioning (EC) effects. In this regard, it is crucial to consider that an extinction procedure involves repeated exposure to the CS that is known to influence evaluations due to exposure-induced increases in processing fluency. However, it is unclear whether exposure-induced changes in CS liking occur during extinction and hence bias observed extinction effects. In three experiments (<em>N</em><sub>Experiment1</sub> = 301, <em>N</em><sub>Experiment2</sub> = 296, <em>N</em><sub>Experiment3</sub> = 560), with pictures and words as stimuli, we observed that repeated CS-only presentations after conditioning increased CS processing fluency. Moreover, CS-only presentations also increased CS liking, but only when participants had previously evaluated stimulus fluency. When controlling for mere exposure effects on liking, we observed extinction of EC only when participants evaluated the CSs both post-conditioning and post-extinction, replicating previous findings. We outline implications for EC methodology and applied research and discuss the findings in terms of memory-based judgment processes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48441,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 104715"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022103124001288","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Repeatedly presenting a neutral stimulus (conditioned stimulus, CS) together with a positive or negative stimulus (unconditioned stimulus, US) typically changes liking of the CS. An important question is whether a subsequent extinction phase where the CS is presented without the US extinguishes such evaluative conditioning (EC) effects. In this regard, it is crucial to consider that an extinction procedure involves repeated exposure to the CS that is known to influence evaluations due to exposure-induced increases in processing fluency. However, it is unclear whether exposure-induced changes in CS liking occur during extinction and hence bias observed extinction effects. In three experiments (NExperiment1 = 301, NExperiment2 = 296, NExperiment3 = 560), with pictures and words as stimuli, we observed that repeated CS-only presentations after conditioning increased CS processing fluency. Moreover, CS-only presentations also increased CS liking, but only when participants had previously evaluated stimulus fluency. When controlling for mere exposure effects on liking, we observed extinction of EC only when participants evaluated the CSs both post-conditioning and post-extinction, replicating previous findings. We outline implications for EC methodology and applied research and discuss the findings in terms of memory-based judgment processes.
灭绝程序何时会导致单纯的暴露效应和评价性条件反射的灭绝?
反复呈现中性刺激(条件刺激,CS)和积极或消极刺激(非条件刺激,US)通常会改变CS的喜好。一个重要的问题是,在随后的消灭阶段,当CS在没有US的情况下呈现时,是否会消除这种评价条件反射(EC)效应。在这方面,至关重要的是要考虑到,消退过程涉及到重复暴露于已知会影响评估的CS,因为暴露会导致加工流畅性的增加。然而,尚不清楚暴露引起的CS喜好变化是否发生在消光期间,因此偏见观察到消光效应。在以图片和文字作为刺激的三个实验(实验1 = 301,实验2 = 296,实验3 = 560)中,我们观察到条件反射后重复的CS-only呈现增加了CS加工流畅性。此外,仅使用CS的演示也增加了对CS的喜爱,但前提是参与者之前已经评估过刺激流畅性。在控制单纯暴露对喜欢的影响时,我们观察到只有当参与者在条件反射后和消失后评估CSs时,才会出现EC的消失,这与之前的研究结果相同。我们概述了EC方法和应用研究的含义,并讨论了基于记忆的判断过程方面的发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
2.90%
发文量
134
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Social Psychology publishes original research and theory on human social behavior and related phenomena. The journal emphasizes empirical, conceptually based research that advances an understanding of important social psychological processes. The journal also publishes literature reviews, theoretical analyses, and methodological comments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信