Research on the optimal incentive and constraint mechanisms for corporate carbon information disclosure considering different market contexts: A network-based evolutionary game analysis

IF 13.6 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Chaoping Zhu, Yixuan Su, Ruguo Fan, Ruiheng Xu, Bing Li
{"title":"Research on the optimal incentive and constraint mechanisms for corporate carbon information disclosure considering different market contexts: A network-based evolutionary game analysis","authors":"Chaoping Zhu, Yixuan Su, Ruguo Fan, Ruiheng Xu, Bing Li","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Corporate carbon information disclosure (CCID) is essential for facilitating a low-carbon transition in energy-intensive industries and achieving the “dual carbon” goals. However, many enterprises fail to fulfill their CCID obligations. This paper develops a complex network evolutionary game model for examining CCID in diverse market contexts and determining optimal incentive and constraint mechanisms. The findings reveal that: (1) The optimal single tax discount incentive or joint punishment constraint in a perfectly competitive market is lower than that in a monopolistically competitive market. (2) There is no notable discrepancy in the optimal single financial penalty constraints between the two market contexts. (3) The optimal combined incentive and constraint and the evolutionary time of CCID in a perfectly competitive market are less than those in a monopolistically competitive market. (4) Joint punishments reduce the optimal constraint for the complete diffusion of CCID compared to financial penalties, and combined mechanisms shorten the evolutionary time of CCID compared to the single mechanisms. This study not only identifies the optimal incentive and constraint mechanisms for CCID under single and combined scenarios, but also offers practical insights for the formulation of effective strategies to guide CCID in different market contexts.","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108207","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Corporate carbon information disclosure (CCID) is essential for facilitating a low-carbon transition in energy-intensive industries and achieving the “dual carbon” goals. However, many enterprises fail to fulfill their CCID obligations. This paper develops a complex network evolutionary game model for examining CCID in diverse market contexts and determining optimal incentive and constraint mechanisms. The findings reveal that: (1) The optimal single tax discount incentive or joint punishment constraint in a perfectly competitive market is lower than that in a monopolistically competitive market. (2) There is no notable discrepancy in the optimal single financial penalty constraints between the two market contexts. (3) The optimal combined incentive and constraint and the evolutionary time of CCID in a perfectly competitive market are less than those in a monopolistically competitive market. (4) Joint punishments reduce the optimal constraint for the complete diffusion of CCID compared to financial penalties, and combined mechanisms shorten the evolutionary time of CCID compared to the single mechanisms. This study not only identifies the optimal incentive and constraint mechanisms for CCID under single and combined scenarios, but also offers practical insights for the formulation of effective strategies to guide CCID in different market contexts.
不同市场环境下企业碳信息披露的最优激励约束机制研究——基于网络的演化博弈分析
企业碳信息披露(CCID)是促进能源密集型产业低碳转型和实现“双碳”目标的关键。然而,许多企业未能履行其CCID义务。本文建立了一个复杂的网络进化博弈模型,用于研究不同市场环境下的CCID,并确定最优的激励和约束机制。研究结果表明:(1)完全竞争市场的最优单一税收优惠激励或联合惩罚约束低于垄断竞争市场。(2)两种市场环境下的最优单项罚金约束不存在显著差异。(3)完全竞争市场下CCID的最优激励约束组合和演化时间小于垄断竞争市场。(4)联合惩罚相对于金融惩罚降低了CCID完全扩散的最优约束,联合机制相对于单一机制缩短了CCID的演化时间。本研究不仅确定了单一和组合情景下CCID的最优激励和约束机制,而且为制定有效的策略来指导不同市场情境下的CCID提供了实践见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Economics
Energy Economics ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
18.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
524
期刊介绍: Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信