{"title":"Assessment of viable tumours by [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT after local regional treatment in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma","authors":"Dongling Zhu, Shuang Song, Sijuan Zou, Dong Kuang, Dongdong Wang, Xiangde Min, Zhaoyan Feng, Yuankai Zhu, Zhaoting Cheng, Siyuan Cheng, Jianyuan Zhou, Ruping Pan, Haojun Chen, Xiaohua Zhu","doi":"10.1007/s00259-024-07062-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>To investigate the efficacy of [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT for assessing viable tumours (VTs) after local regional treatment (LRT) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. The related imaging features of HCC after LRT are preliminarily discussed.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>A cohort of 37 LRT patients with HCC (encompassing 51 lesions) was retrospectively included from a prospective parent study (ChiCTR2000039099), and sequential PET/CT using [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG and [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 was performed. The diagnostic accuracies of [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 and [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT and multiphasic CT/MRI for detecting VTs after LRT were calculated and analysed. Pathological examination was considered the gold standard for VT diagnosis, and clinical follow-up was used as the reference standard. The SUVmax and tumour-to-background ratio (TBR) derived from [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG and [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT were calculated and compared. Moreover, the SUVmax, target-to-normal liver ratio (TNR) of VT, tumour necrosis (TN), benign rim (BR), and normal liver (NL) from different imaging modalities after LRT for HCC were compared.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Both the sensitivity (96.0% [24/25] vs. 36.0% [9/25], <i>p</i> < 0.001) and accuracy (94.1%, [48/51] vs. 68.6% [35/51], <i>p</i> = 0.004) of [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT for detecting VTs after LRT were greater than those of [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT, whereas their specificities were comparable (92.3% [24/26] vs. 100% [26/26]). Notably, [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT had a greater SUVmax (9.80 vs. 3.60) and TBR (9.93 vs. 1.57) than [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT in VT patients (all <i>p</i> < 0.001). Furthermore, VT had a greater SUVmax and TNR than did TN, BR, and NL on [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT (all <i>p</i> < 0.001) and exhibited morphologic nodular, mass-like, or irregular tracer uptake. Although no significant differences were observed for VT detection (all <i>p</i> > 0.05), [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT and multiphasic CT/MRI complemented each other in some cases.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>[<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT not only presented higher sensitivity and accuracy than [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT for diagnosing VTs after LRT for HCC but also showed comparable diagnostic accuracy and complementary roles with multiphasic CT/MRI. Overall, [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT may play an essential role in surveillance after LRT for HCC.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Trial registration</h3><p>Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2000039099. Registered 17 October 2020.</p>","PeriodicalId":11909,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging","volume":"101 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-024-07062-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
To investigate the efficacy of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT for assessing viable tumours (VTs) after local regional treatment (LRT) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. The related imaging features of HCC after LRT are preliminarily discussed.
Methods
A cohort of 37 LRT patients with HCC (encompassing 51 lesions) was retrospectively included from a prospective parent study (ChiCTR2000039099), and sequential PET/CT using [18F]FDG and [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 was performed. The diagnostic accuracies of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 and [18F]FDG PET/CT and multiphasic CT/MRI for detecting VTs after LRT were calculated and analysed. Pathological examination was considered the gold standard for VT diagnosis, and clinical follow-up was used as the reference standard. The SUVmax and tumour-to-background ratio (TBR) derived from [18F]FDG and [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT were calculated and compared. Moreover, the SUVmax, target-to-normal liver ratio (TNR) of VT, tumour necrosis (TN), benign rim (BR), and normal liver (NL) from different imaging modalities after LRT for HCC were compared.
Results
Both the sensitivity (96.0% [24/25] vs. 36.0% [9/25], p < 0.001) and accuracy (94.1%, [48/51] vs. 68.6% [35/51], p = 0.004) of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT for detecting VTs after LRT were greater than those of [18F]FDG PET/CT, whereas their specificities were comparable (92.3% [24/26] vs. 100% [26/26]). Notably, [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT had a greater SUVmax (9.80 vs. 3.60) and TBR (9.93 vs. 1.57) than [18F]FDG PET/CT in VT patients (all p < 0.001). Furthermore, VT had a greater SUVmax and TNR than did TN, BR, and NL on [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT (all p < 0.001) and exhibited morphologic nodular, mass-like, or irregular tracer uptake. Although no significant differences were observed for VT detection (all p > 0.05), [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT and multiphasic CT/MRI complemented each other in some cases.
Conclusion
[68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT not only presented higher sensitivity and accuracy than [18F]FDG PET/CT for diagnosing VTs after LRT for HCC but also showed comparable diagnostic accuracy and complementary roles with multiphasic CT/MRI. Overall, [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT may play an essential role in surveillance after LRT for HCC.
Trial registration
Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2000039099. Registered 17 October 2020.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging serves as a platform for the exchange of clinical and scientific information within nuclear medicine and related professions. It welcomes international submissions from professionals involved in the functional, metabolic, and molecular investigation of diseases. The journal's coverage spans physics, dosimetry, radiation biology, radiochemistry, and pharmacy, providing high-quality peer review by experts in the field. Known for highly cited and downloaded articles, it ensures global visibility for research work and is part of the EJNMMI journal family.