Assessment of viable tumours by [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT after local regional treatment in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

IF 8.6 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Dongling Zhu, Shuang Song, Sijuan Zou, Dong Kuang, Dongdong Wang, Xiangde Min, Zhaoyan Feng, Yuankai Zhu, Zhaoting Cheng, Siyuan Cheng, Jianyuan Zhou, Ruping Pan, Haojun Chen, Xiaohua Zhu
{"title":"Assessment of viable tumours by [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT after local regional treatment in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma","authors":"Dongling Zhu, Shuang Song, Sijuan Zou, Dong Kuang, Dongdong Wang, Xiangde Min, Zhaoyan Feng, Yuankai Zhu, Zhaoting Cheng, Siyuan Cheng, Jianyuan Zhou, Ruping Pan, Haojun Chen, Xiaohua Zhu","doi":"10.1007/s00259-024-07062-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>To investigate the efficacy of [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT for assessing viable tumours (VTs) after local regional treatment (LRT) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. The related imaging features of HCC after LRT are preliminarily discussed.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>A cohort of 37 LRT patients with HCC (encompassing 51 lesions) was retrospectively included from a prospective parent study (ChiCTR2000039099), and sequential PET/CT using [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG and [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 was performed. The diagnostic accuracies of [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 and [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT and multiphasic CT/MRI for detecting VTs after LRT were calculated and analysed. Pathological examination was considered the gold standard for VT diagnosis, and clinical follow-up was used as the reference standard. The SUVmax and tumour-to-background ratio (TBR) derived from [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG and [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT were calculated and compared. Moreover, the SUVmax, target-to-normal liver ratio (TNR) of VT, tumour necrosis (TN), benign rim (BR), and normal liver (NL) from different imaging modalities after LRT for HCC were compared.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Both the sensitivity (96.0% [24/25] vs. 36.0% [9/25], <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and accuracy (94.1%, [48/51] vs. 68.6% [35/51], <i>p</i> = 0.004) of [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT for detecting VTs after LRT were greater than those of [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT, whereas their specificities were comparable (92.3% [24/26] vs. 100% [26/26]). Notably, [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT had a greater SUVmax (9.80 vs. 3.60) and TBR (9.93 vs. 1.57) than [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT in VT patients (all <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Furthermore, VT had a greater SUVmax and TNR than did TN, BR, and NL on [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT (all <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and exhibited morphologic nodular, mass-like, or irregular tracer uptake. Although no significant differences were observed for VT detection (all <i>p</i> &gt; 0.05), [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT and multiphasic CT/MRI complemented each other in some cases.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>[<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT not only presented higher sensitivity and accuracy than [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT for diagnosing VTs after LRT for HCC but also showed comparable diagnostic accuracy and complementary roles with multiphasic CT/MRI. Overall, [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT may play an essential role in surveillance after LRT for HCC.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Trial registration</h3><p>Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2000039099. Registered 17 October 2020.</p>","PeriodicalId":11909,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging","volume":"101 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-024-07062-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the efficacy of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT for assessing viable tumours (VTs) after local regional treatment (LRT) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. The related imaging features of HCC after LRT are preliminarily discussed.

Methods

A cohort of 37 LRT patients with HCC (encompassing 51 lesions) was retrospectively included from a prospective parent study (ChiCTR2000039099), and sequential PET/CT using [18F]FDG and [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 was performed. The diagnostic accuracies of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 and [18F]FDG PET/CT and multiphasic CT/MRI for detecting VTs after LRT were calculated and analysed. Pathological examination was considered the gold standard for VT diagnosis, and clinical follow-up was used as the reference standard. The SUVmax and tumour-to-background ratio (TBR) derived from [18F]FDG and [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT were calculated and compared. Moreover, the SUVmax, target-to-normal liver ratio (TNR) of VT, tumour necrosis (TN), benign rim (BR), and normal liver (NL) from different imaging modalities after LRT for HCC were compared.

Results

Both the sensitivity (96.0% [24/25] vs. 36.0% [9/25], p < 0.001) and accuracy (94.1%, [48/51] vs. 68.6% [35/51], p = 0.004) of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT for detecting VTs after LRT were greater than those of [18F]FDG PET/CT, whereas their specificities were comparable (92.3% [24/26] vs. 100% [26/26]). Notably, [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT had a greater SUVmax (9.80 vs. 3.60) and TBR (9.93 vs. 1.57) than [18F]FDG PET/CT in VT patients (all p < 0.001). Furthermore, VT had a greater SUVmax and TNR than did TN, BR, and NL on [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT (all p < 0.001) and exhibited morphologic nodular, mass-like, or irregular tracer uptake. Although no significant differences were observed for VT detection (all p > 0.05), [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT and multiphasic CT/MRI complemented each other in some cases.

Conclusion

[68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT not only presented higher sensitivity and accuracy than [18F]FDG PET/CT for diagnosing VTs after LRT for HCC but also showed comparable diagnostic accuracy and complementary roles with multiphasic CT/MRI. Overall, [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT may play an essential role in surveillance after LRT for HCC.

Trial registration

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2000039099. Registered 17 October 2020.

肝细胞癌局部治疗后[68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT评估肿瘤存活情况
目的探讨[68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT在肝细胞癌(HCC)局部治疗(LRT)后存活肿瘤(VTs)评估中的作用。初步探讨肝细胞癌LRT后的相关影像学特征。方法回顾性纳入前瞻性父研究(ChiCTR2000039099)的37例肝细胞癌LRT患者(包括51个病变),并使用[18F]FDG和[68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04进行序列PET/CT检查。计算分析[68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04和[18F]FDG PET/CT和多相CT/MRI对LRT后VTs的诊断准确率。病理检查被认为是VT诊断的金标准,临床随访作为参考标准。计算并比较[18F]FDG和[68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT的SUVmax和肿瘤与背景比(TBR)。此外,我们还比较了肝细胞癌LRT后不同成像方式下VT、肿瘤坏死(TN)、良性边缘(BR)和正常肝脏(NL)的SUVmax、靶-正常肝比(TNR)。结果[68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT检测LRT后VTs的灵敏度(96.0%[24/25]对36.0% [9/25],p < 0.001)和准确性(94.1%,[48/51]对68.6% [35/51],p = 0.004)均高于[18F]FDG PET/CT,特异性相当(92.3%[24/26]对100%[26/26])。值得注意的是,与[18F]FDG PET/CT相比,[68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT在VT患者中的SUVmax (9.80 vs. 3.60)和TBR (9.93 vs. 1.57)更高(均p <; 0.001)。此外,在[68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT上,VT比TN、BR和NL具有更高的SUVmax和TNR(均p <; 0.001),并表现出形态上的结节状、肿块样或不规则示踪剂摄取。虽然在VT检测上没有观察到显著差异(均p >; 0.05),但[68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT与多相CT/MRI在某些病例中是互补的。结论[68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT诊断肝细胞癌LRT后VTs的敏感性和准确性均高于[18F]FDG PET/CT,且与多相CT/MRI的诊断准确性相当,具有互补作用。总之,[68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT可能在肝细胞癌LRT后的监测中发挥重要作用。中国临床试验注册中心ChiCTR2000039099。注册于2020年10月17日
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
9.90%
发文量
392
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging serves as a platform for the exchange of clinical and scientific information within nuclear medicine and related professions. It welcomes international submissions from professionals involved in the functional, metabolic, and molecular investigation of diseases. The journal's coverage spans physics, dosimetry, radiation biology, radiochemistry, and pharmacy, providing high-quality peer review by experts in the field. Known for highly cited and downloaded articles, it ensures global visibility for research work and is part of the EJNMMI journal family.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信