Oguz A. Kurucu , Demet Yılmaz , Sedanur Kalecik , Yusuf Z. Menceloglu
{"title":"Gamma, charged particle and neutron shielding properties of polyethylene based thermoplastic compounds doped with titanate and zirconate additives","authors":"Oguz A. Kurucu , Demet Yılmaz , Sedanur Kalecik , Yusuf Z. Menceloglu","doi":"10.1016/j.radphyschem.2025.112524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Knowing how efficient radiation shielding materials are being essential for a variety of uses, including nuclear power plants and medical imaging. This study examined the gamma and neutron shielding capabilities of thermoplastic polymers based on polyethylene and doped with titanate and zirconate additions. Over an energy range of 53.16–383.85 keV, experimental measurements were made of the compound's mass attenuation coefficients (MAC), mean free pathways (MFP), half-value layers (HVL), and effective atomic numbers (Z<sub>eff</sub>). Additionally, a Am<sup>241</sup>-Be fast neutron source with an activity of 10 mCi was used to measure neutron equivalent dose rates. The exposure buildup factor (EBF) and the neutron removal cross section (ΣR) were calculated theoretically. Assessment of a compound's appropriateness for nuclear security applications with an emphasis on its alpha and proton shielding capabilities. The neutron equivalent dose rate for the PP/PE was 9.4722%, while it was 37.9283% for the PP/PE/Zirconate. Based on gamma and neutron shielding efficiencies, the observed results suggest that polyethylene based thermoplastic compounds containing zirconate could be viable options for mask materials used in radiotherapy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20861,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Physics and Chemistry","volume":"229 ","pages":"Article 112524"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Physics and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969806X25000167","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Knowing how efficient radiation shielding materials are being essential for a variety of uses, including nuclear power plants and medical imaging. This study examined the gamma and neutron shielding capabilities of thermoplastic polymers based on polyethylene and doped with titanate and zirconate additions. Over an energy range of 53.16–383.85 keV, experimental measurements were made of the compound's mass attenuation coefficients (MAC), mean free pathways (MFP), half-value layers (HVL), and effective atomic numbers (Zeff). Additionally, a Am241-Be fast neutron source with an activity of 10 mCi was used to measure neutron equivalent dose rates. The exposure buildup factor (EBF) and the neutron removal cross section (ΣR) were calculated theoretically. Assessment of a compound's appropriateness for nuclear security applications with an emphasis on its alpha and proton shielding capabilities. The neutron equivalent dose rate for the PP/PE was 9.4722%, while it was 37.9283% for the PP/PE/Zirconate. Based on gamma and neutron shielding efficiencies, the observed results suggest that polyethylene based thermoplastic compounds containing zirconate could be viable options for mask materials used in radiotherapy.
期刊介绍:
Radiation Physics and Chemistry is a multidisciplinary journal that provides a medium for publication of substantial and original papers, reviews, and short communications which focus on research and developments involving ionizing radiation in radiation physics, radiation chemistry and radiation processing.
The journal aims to publish papers with significance to an international audience, containing substantial novelty and scientific impact. The Editors reserve the rights to reject, with or without external review, papers that do not meet these criteria. This could include papers that are very similar to previous publications, only with changed target substrates, employed materials, analyzed sites and experimental methods, report results without presenting new insights and/or hypothesis testing, or do not focus on the radiation effects.