Effect of Characteristic Inflammatory and Structural Pelvic Magnetic Resonance Imaging Lesions on Expert Assessment of Axial Juvenile Spondyloarthritis.

Adam Mayer,Timothy G Brandon,Amita Aggarwal,Ruben Burgos-Vargas,Robert A Colbert,Gerd Horneff,Rik Joos,Ronald M Laxer,Kirsten Minden,Angelo Ravelli,Nicolino Ruperto,Judith A Smith,Matthew L Stoll,Shirley M Tse,Filip Van den Bosch,Walter P Maksymowych,Robert G Lambert,David M Biko,Nancy A Chauvin,Michael L Francavilla,Jacob L Jaremko,Nele Herregods,Ozgur Kasapcopur,Mehmet Yildiz,Hemalatha Srinivasalu,Jennifer A Faerber,Ray Naden,Alison M Hendry,Pamela F Weiss
{"title":"Effect of Characteristic Inflammatory and Structural Pelvic Magnetic Resonance Imaging Lesions on Expert Assessment of Axial Juvenile Spondyloarthritis.","authors":"Adam Mayer,Timothy G Brandon,Amita Aggarwal,Ruben Burgos-Vargas,Robert A Colbert,Gerd Horneff,Rik Joos,Ronald M Laxer,Kirsten Minden,Angelo Ravelli,Nicolino Ruperto,Judith A Smith,Matthew L Stoll,Shirley M Tse,Filip Van den Bosch,Walter P Maksymowych,Robert G Lambert,David M Biko,Nancy A Chauvin,Michael L Francavilla,Jacob L Jaremko,Nele Herregods,Ozgur Kasapcopur,Mehmet Yildiz,Hemalatha Srinivasalu,Jennifer A Faerber,Ray Naden,Alison M Hendry,Pamela F Weiss","doi":"10.3899/jrheum.2024-0696","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\r\nTo evaluate the influence of pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings on axial disease assessment in juvenile spondyloarthritis (JSpA).\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nThis was a cross-sectional study of patients with JSpA with suspected axial disease. Three experts reviewed each case and rated their confidence (-3 to +3) in the presence of axial disease, first with clinical data and second with clinical and MRI data. Agreement was defined as ≥ 2/3 clinical experts with a rating of ≤ -1 or ≥ 1, and high confidence agreement as ≤ -2 or ≥ 2. The association of clinical features and both global assessments was tested with modified Poisson regression models.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nTwo hundred seventy-two of 303 cases (89.8%) achieved agreement with clinical data alone. Adding imaging data affected agreement in 38.9% (118/303) and directionality of agreement in 23.4% (71/303). Agreement was facilitated in 26/31 cases and lost in 21/272 cases. Of those 71 cases that changed directionality, 33 changed from axial disease being absent to present and 38 from present to absent. The final model had an area under the receiver-operating characteristic (AUROC) curve of 0.93 and 3 factors were independently associated with expert agreement (HLA-B27: relative risk [RR] 1.41, 95% CI 1.14-1.74; pain improvement with activity: RR 1.27, 95% CI 1.05-1.54; and bone marrow edema on MRI: RR 4.08, 95% CI 2.91-5.73).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nThe addition of imaging data affected directionality and improved high confidence agreement of expert assessment of axial disease. These results underscore the integral role of MRI in the determination of axial disease in JSpA.","PeriodicalId":501812,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Rheumatology","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.2024-0696","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the influence of pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings on axial disease assessment in juvenile spondyloarthritis (JSpA). METHODS This was a cross-sectional study of patients with JSpA with suspected axial disease. Three experts reviewed each case and rated their confidence (-3 to +3) in the presence of axial disease, first with clinical data and second with clinical and MRI data. Agreement was defined as ≥ 2/3 clinical experts with a rating of ≤ -1 or ≥ 1, and high confidence agreement as ≤ -2 or ≥ 2. The association of clinical features and both global assessments was tested with modified Poisson regression models. RESULTS Two hundred seventy-two of 303 cases (89.8%) achieved agreement with clinical data alone. Adding imaging data affected agreement in 38.9% (118/303) and directionality of agreement in 23.4% (71/303). Agreement was facilitated in 26/31 cases and lost in 21/272 cases. Of those 71 cases that changed directionality, 33 changed from axial disease being absent to present and 38 from present to absent. The final model had an area under the receiver-operating characteristic (AUROC) curve of 0.93 and 3 factors were independently associated with expert agreement (HLA-B27: relative risk [RR] 1.41, 95% CI 1.14-1.74; pain improvement with activity: RR 1.27, 95% CI 1.05-1.54; and bone marrow edema on MRI: RR 4.08, 95% CI 2.91-5.73). CONCLUSION The addition of imaging data affected directionality and improved high confidence agreement of expert assessment of axial disease. These results underscore the integral role of MRI in the determination of axial disease in JSpA.
特征性炎性和结构性骨盆磁共振成像病变对中轴型青少年脊椎关节炎专家评估的影响。
目的探讨盆腔磁共振成像(MRI)对青少年脊柱炎(JSpA)轴性疾病诊断的影响。方法对疑似轴性疾病的JSpA患者进行横断面研究。三位专家对每个病例进行了审查,并根据临床数据和临床和MRI数据对他们对轴向疾病存在的置信度(-3至+3)进行了评级。一致性定义为≥2/3的临床专家,评分≤-1或≥1,高置信度一致性定义为≤-2或≥2。临床特征与两种整体评估的关联用改进的泊松回归模型进行检验。结果303例患者中有272例(89.8%)与临床吻合。添加影像学资料影响一致性的占38.9%(118/303),影响一致性的占23.4%(71/303)。31个案件中有26个达成协议,272个案件中有21个败诉。在71例方向性改变的病例中,33例由无轴向病变变为有,38例由有轴向病变变为无轴向病变。最终模型的受试者操作特征(AUROC)曲线下面积为0.93,3个因素与专家同意度独立相关(HLA-B27:相对危险度[RR] 1.41, 95% CI 1.14-1.74;疼痛改善与活动:RR 1.27, 95% CI 1.05-1.54;MRI显示骨髓水肿:RR 4.08, 95% CI 2.91 ~ 5.73)。结论影像学资料的增加影响了轴向疾病的方向性,提高了专家评估的高置信度。这些结果强调了MRI在确定JSpA轴性疾病中的整体作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信