From Hero to Zero: A Single Center Retrospective Review of the Utility of Routine Physical Crossmatching.

IF 8.9 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Robert Achram,Anna Morris,Lalit Patel,Robert Bray,Howard Gebel,H Cliff Sullivan
{"title":"From Hero to Zero: A Single Center Retrospective Review of the Utility of Routine Physical Crossmatching.","authors":"Robert Achram,Anna Morris,Lalit Patel,Robert Bray,Howard Gebel,H Cliff Sullivan","doi":"10.1016/j.ajt.2025.01.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pre-transplantation HLA antibody testing is necessary to assess compatibility between donor and recipient pairs. Over the past decade, the virtual crossmatch (VXM) has replaced the physical crossmatch (PXM) as the main assessment of pre-transplant histocompatibility. At our center, most transplants have proceeded based solely on the VXM, followed by a retrospective PXM. In this study, we sought to determine whether VXMs alone are sufficient and if routine retrospective PXMs can be discontinued. A review of PXMs for single solid organ transplant cases between 5/19/2020 and 12/9/2022 was performed to examine the concordance between the PXM and VXM (including predictions of the PXM made in the VXM report). The relationship between PXM results (PXMR) and donor specific antibody (DSA) mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) values was also examined. The overall PXM prediction/PXM result concordance rate was 99.7% based on PXMs attributed to HLA antibody. Furthermore, DSA MFI values can guide clinical decisions on whether to perform a PXM. The data confirm that, in the era of the VXM, routine PXMs performed for all transplants are not warranted. However, a PXM may still be informative in select cases where low-to-intermediate strength DSAs are present or when the virtual assessment is ambiguous.","PeriodicalId":123,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Transplantation","volume":"72 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajt.2025.01.010","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pre-transplantation HLA antibody testing is necessary to assess compatibility between donor and recipient pairs. Over the past decade, the virtual crossmatch (VXM) has replaced the physical crossmatch (PXM) as the main assessment of pre-transplant histocompatibility. At our center, most transplants have proceeded based solely on the VXM, followed by a retrospective PXM. In this study, we sought to determine whether VXMs alone are sufficient and if routine retrospective PXMs can be discontinued. A review of PXMs for single solid organ transplant cases between 5/19/2020 and 12/9/2022 was performed to examine the concordance between the PXM and VXM (including predictions of the PXM made in the VXM report). The relationship between PXM results (PXMR) and donor specific antibody (DSA) mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) values was also examined. The overall PXM prediction/PXM result concordance rate was 99.7% based on PXMs attributed to HLA antibody. Furthermore, DSA MFI values can guide clinical decisions on whether to perform a PXM. The data confirm that, in the era of the VXM, routine PXMs performed for all transplants are not warranted. However, a PXM may still be informative in select cases where low-to-intermediate strength DSAs are present or when the virtual assessment is ambiguous.
从英雄到零:常规物理交叉匹配效用的单中心回顾。
移植前HLA抗体检测对于评估供体和受体之间的相容性是必要的。近十年来,虚拟交叉配伍(VXM)已取代物理交叉配伍(PXM)成为评价移植前组织相容性的主要方法。在我们中心,大多数移植手术仅基于VXM,然后是回顾性PXM。在这项研究中,我们试图确定单独使用VXMs是否足够,是否可以停止常规回顾性PXMs。我们回顾了2020年5月19日至2022年12月9日单个实体器官移植病例的PXM,以检查PXM与VXM之间的一致性(包括VXM报告中对PXM的预测)。PXM结果(PXMR)与供体特异性抗体(DSA)平均荧光强度(MFI)值之间的关系也被检测。HLA抗体引起的PXM预测与PXM结果的总体一致性率为99.7%。此外,DSA MFI值可以指导临床决定是否进行PXM。数据证实,在VXM时代,对所有移植手术进行常规PXMs是不合理的。然而,在存在低到中等强度dsa或虚拟评估不明确的情况下,PXM仍然可以提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
18.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
346
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Transplantation is a leading journal in the field of transplantation. It serves as a forum for debate and reassessment, an agent of change, and a major platform for promoting understanding, improving results, and advancing science. Published monthly, it provides an essential resource for researchers and clinicians worldwide. The journal publishes original articles, case reports, invited reviews, letters to the editor, critical reviews, news features, consensus documents, and guidelines over 12 issues a year. It covers all major subject areas in transplantation, including thoracic (heart, lung), abdominal (kidney, liver, pancreas, islets), tissue and stem cell transplantation, organ and tissue donation and preservation, tissue injury, repair, inflammation, and aging, histocompatibility, drugs and pharmacology, graft survival, and prevention of graft dysfunction and failure. It also explores ethical and social issues in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信