Robert Achram,Anna Morris,Lalit Patel,Robert Bray,Howard Gebel,H Cliff Sullivan
{"title":"From Hero to Zero: A Single Center Retrospective Review of the Utility of Routine Physical Crossmatching.","authors":"Robert Achram,Anna Morris,Lalit Patel,Robert Bray,Howard Gebel,H Cliff Sullivan","doi":"10.1016/j.ajt.2025.01.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pre-transplantation HLA antibody testing is necessary to assess compatibility between donor and recipient pairs. Over the past decade, the virtual crossmatch (VXM) has replaced the physical crossmatch (PXM) as the main assessment of pre-transplant histocompatibility. At our center, most transplants have proceeded based solely on the VXM, followed by a retrospective PXM. In this study, we sought to determine whether VXMs alone are sufficient and if routine retrospective PXMs can be discontinued. A review of PXMs for single solid organ transplant cases between 5/19/2020 and 12/9/2022 was performed to examine the concordance between the PXM and VXM (including predictions of the PXM made in the VXM report). The relationship between PXM results (PXMR) and donor specific antibody (DSA) mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) values was also examined. The overall PXM prediction/PXM result concordance rate was 99.7% based on PXMs attributed to HLA antibody. Furthermore, DSA MFI values can guide clinical decisions on whether to perform a PXM. The data confirm that, in the era of the VXM, routine PXMs performed for all transplants are not warranted. However, a PXM may still be informative in select cases where low-to-intermediate strength DSAs are present or when the virtual assessment is ambiguous.","PeriodicalId":123,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Transplantation","volume":"72 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajt.2025.01.010","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Pre-transplantation HLA antibody testing is necessary to assess compatibility between donor and recipient pairs. Over the past decade, the virtual crossmatch (VXM) has replaced the physical crossmatch (PXM) as the main assessment of pre-transplant histocompatibility. At our center, most transplants have proceeded based solely on the VXM, followed by a retrospective PXM. In this study, we sought to determine whether VXMs alone are sufficient and if routine retrospective PXMs can be discontinued. A review of PXMs for single solid organ transplant cases between 5/19/2020 and 12/9/2022 was performed to examine the concordance between the PXM and VXM (including predictions of the PXM made in the VXM report). The relationship between PXM results (PXMR) and donor specific antibody (DSA) mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) values was also examined. The overall PXM prediction/PXM result concordance rate was 99.7% based on PXMs attributed to HLA antibody. Furthermore, DSA MFI values can guide clinical decisions on whether to perform a PXM. The data confirm that, in the era of the VXM, routine PXMs performed for all transplants are not warranted. However, a PXM may still be informative in select cases where low-to-intermediate strength DSAs are present or when the virtual assessment is ambiguous.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Transplantation is a leading journal in the field of transplantation. It serves as a forum for debate and reassessment, an agent of change, and a major platform for promoting understanding, improving results, and advancing science. Published monthly, it provides an essential resource for researchers and clinicians worldwide.
The journal publishes original articles, case reports, invited reviews, letters to the editor, critical reviews, news features, consensus documents, and guidelines over 12 issues a year. It covers all major subject areas in transplantation, including thoracic (heart, lung), abdominal (kidney, liver, pancreas, islets), tissue and stem cell transplantation, organ and tissue donation and preservation, tissue injury, repair, inflammation, and aging, histocompatibility, drugs and pharmacology, graft survival, and prevention of graft dysfunction and failure. It also explores ethical and social issues in the field.