Colorimetric analysis of intraoral scans: A novel approach for detecting gingival inflammation

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Mohamed Ahmed Hassan, Guilherme Castro Lima Silva do Amaral, Luciana Saraiva, Marinella Holzhausen, Fausto Medeiros Mendes, Claudio Mendes Pannuti, Bernal Stewart, Zilson M. Malheiros, Carlos Benítez, Laís Yumi Souza Nakao, Cristina Cunha Villar, Giuseppe Alexandre Romito
{"title":"Colorimetric analysis of intraoral scans: A novel approach for detecting gingival inflammation","authors":"Mohamed Ahmed Hassan, Guilherme Castro Lima Silva do Amaral, Luciana Saraiva, Marinella Holzhausen, Fausto Medeiros Mendes, Claudio Mendes Pannuti, Bernal Stewart, Zilson M. Malheiros, Carlos Benítez, Laís Yumi Souza Nakao, Cristina Cunha Villar, Giuseppe Alexandre Romito","doi":"10.1002/jper.24-0389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundGingivitis, a widely prevalent oral health condition, affects up to 80% of the population. Traditional assessment methods for gingivitis rely heavily on subjective clinical evaluation. This study seeks to explore the efficacy of interpreting the color metrics from intraoral scans to objectively differentiate between healthy and inflamed gingiva.MethodsThis study used the percentage of bleeding on probing (BOP%) as the clinical reference standard. Intraoral scans, obtained before and after gingivitis treatment using a scanner, were analyzed through a custom MATLAB script to quantify HSV (hue, saturation, value) and CIELAB (Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage L*a*b*) color coordinates. The region of interest was a 2‐mm‐wide gingival strip along the buccal margin of the maxillary anterior teeth. Linear regression analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship between photometric outcomes and continuous, dichotomous, and categorical BOP data. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), as well as sensitivity and specificity measures.ResultsThe analysis included clinical and digital color data from 110 scans, adhering to the STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) guidelines. The multilevel linear regression analysis underscored a significant correlation between the BOP% and digital color metrics, specifically the CIELAB a* (red‐green chroma), CIELAB b* (yellow‐blue chroma), and color saturation, with AUC performances of 70%, 79.5%, and 80.8%, respectively.ConclusionDigital color analysis of intraoral scans has demonstrated a range of performance from acceptable to excellent in distinguishing sites with BOP. This innovative approach presents a promising tool for dentists and researchers in the accurate diagnosis, screening, and management of gingivitis.Plain Language SummaryOur study focuses on finding a better way to detect gingivitis, a common gum disease affecting many people. Traditional methods rely on the dentist's visual inspection, which can be subjective. We explored the use of color measurements from digital intraoral scans to objectively identify healthy versus inflamed gums. We analyzed 110 scans from 55 participants, examining the color differences in the gums before and after treatment. By measuring specific color values, we achieved up to 80.8% accuracy in distinguishing between healthy and inflamed gums. This method could offer a more reliable tool for dentists and researchers to diagnose and manage gingivitis, leading to better oral health outcomes.","PeriodicalId":16716,"journal":{"name":"Journal of periodontology","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of periodontology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jper.24-0389","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundGingivitis, a widely prevalent oral health condition, affects up to 80% of the population. Traditional assessment methods for gingivitis rely heavily on subjective clinical evaluation. This study seeks to explore the efficacy of interpreting the color metrics from intraoral scans to objectively differentiate between healthy and inflamed gingiva.MethodsThis study used the percentage of bleeding on probing (BOP%) as the clinical reference standard. Intraoral scans, obtained before and after gingivitis treatment using a scanner, were analyzed through a custom MATLAB script to quantify HSV (hue, saturation, value) and CIELAB (Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage L*a*b*) color coordinates. The region of interest was a 2‐mm‐wide gingival strip along the buccal margin of the maxillary anterior teeth. Linear regression analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship between photometric outcomes and continuous, dichotomous, and categorical BOP data. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), as well as sensitivity and specificity measures.ResultsThe analysis included clinical and digital color data from 110 scans, adhering to the STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) guidelines. The multilevel linear regression analysis underscored a significant correlation between the BOP% and digital color metrics, specifically the CIELAB a* (red‐green chroma), CIELAB b* (yellow‐blue chroma), and color saturation, with AUC performances of 70%, 79.5%, and 80.8%, respectively.ConclusionDigital color analysis of intraoral scans has demonstrated a range of performance from acceptable to excellent in distinguishing sites with BOP. This innovative approach presents a promising tool for dentists and researchers in the accurate diagnosis, screening, and management of gingivitis.Plain Language SummaryOur study focuses on finding a better way to detect gingivitis, a common gum disease affecting many people. Traditional methods rely on the dentist's visual inspection, which can be subjective. We explored the use of color measurements from digital intraoral scans to objectively identify healthy versus inflamed gums. We analyzed 110 scans from 55 participants, examining the color differences in the gums before and after treatment. By measuring specific color values, we achieved up to 80.8% accuracy in distinguishing between healthy and inflamed gums. This method could offer a more reliable tool for dentists and researchers to diagnose and manage gingivitis, leading to better oral health outcomes.
口腔内扫描比色分析:一种检测牙龈炎症的新方法
牙龈炎是一种广泛流行的口腔健康状况,影响着多达80%的人口。传统的牙龈炎评估方法严重依赖主观临床评价。本研究旨在探讨解释口腔内扫描的颜色指标的有效性,以客观区分健康和发炎的牙龈。方法以探查出血百分率(BOP%)作为临床参考标准。使用扫描仪在牙龈炎治疗前后获得口腔内扫描,通过定制的MATLAB脚本进行分析,以量化HSV(色调、饱和度、值)和CIELAB (Commission Internationale de l’eclairage l *a*b*)颜色坐标。所研究的区域是沿上颌前牙颊缘的一条2毫米宽的龈带。采用线性回归分析来评估光度测量结果与连续、二分类和分类BOP数据之间的关系。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC)以及敏感性和特异性测量来评估诊断准确性。结果:根据STROBE(加强流行病学观察性研究报告)指南,分析包括来自110次扫描的临床和数字彩色数据。多层线性回归分析强调了BOP%与数字色彩指标之间的显著相关性,特别是CIELAB a*(红绿色度),CIELAB b*(黄蓝色度)和色彩饱和度,AUC性能分别为70%,79.5%和80.8%。结论口内扫描的数字颜色分析显示,在与BOP区分部位方面具有从可接受到优秀的性能。这种创新的方法为牙医和研究人员在牙龈炎的准确诊断、筛查和管理方面提供了一个有前途的工具。你的研究重点是寻找一种更好的方法来检测牙龈炎,这是一种影响许多人的常见牙龈疾病。传统的方法依赖于牙医的视觉检查,这可能是主观的。我们探索了使用数字口内扫描的颜色测量来客观地识别健康的牙龈和发炎的牙龈。我们分析了55名参与者的110张扫描图,检查了治疗前后牙龈的颜色差异。通过测量特定的颜色值,我们在区分健康牙龈和发炎牙龈方面达到了80.8%的准确率。这种方法可以为牙医和研究人员提供更可靠的工具来诊断和治疗牙龈炎,从而获得更好的口腔健康结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of periodontology
Journal of periodontology 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
7.00%
发文量
290
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Periodontology publishes articles relevant to the science and practice of periodontics and related areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信