Dental Implant Rehabilitation in Patients Carrying WNT10A Mutations With Different Molecular Statuses and Phenotypes: A Retrospective Cohort Study

IF 4.8 1区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Jiaqi Dou, Qinggang Dai, Xinbo Yu, Yining He, Yuwei Dai, Feng Wang, Yiqun Wu
{"title":"Dental Implant Rehabilitation in Patients Carrying WNT10A Mutations With Different Molecular Statuses and Phenotypes: A Retrospective Cohort Study","authors":"Jiaqi Dou, Qinggang Dai, Xinbo Yu, Yining He, Yuwei Dai, Feng Wang, Yiqun Wu","doi":"10.1111/clr.14402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives<jats:italic>WNT10A</jats:italic> mutations are associated with tooth agenesis. This study aimed to assess the clinical outcomes of dental implants in patients carrying <jats:italic>WNT10A</jats:italic> mutations with different molecular statuses and phenotypes over a long‐term follow‐up period.Materials and MethodsPatients with tooth agenesis were screened by whole‐exome sequencing (WES) from January 2010 to September 2023. Carriers of pathogenic <jats:italic>WNT10A</jats:italic> mutations who underwent subsequent dental implant therapy were evaluated.ResultsWES identified 66 patients with tooth agenesis carrying <jats:italic>WNT10A</jats:italic> mutations. Of these, 27 patients (11 males/16 females; mean age 19.6 years) met the inclusion criteria. Homozygotes had significantly more missing teeth (24.4 ± 3.8) than heterozygotes (10.9 ± 5.1, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; 0.0001) and compound heterozygotes (13.8 ± 3.5, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.001). A total of 160 conventional implants were placed. Seven implants were lost in four patients before final prosthesis placement, resulting in overall failure rates of 14.8% at the subject level and 4.4% at the implant level. The 5‐year cumulative survival rate (range: 0.23–12.74 years) was 85.2% and 95.6% at the subject and implant levels, respectively. The mean marginal bone loss (MBL) was 0.80 mm (95% CI: 0.59–1.02). Subgroup analysis revealed higher MBL in homozygotes (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.002), sites requiring extensive bone augmentation (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.016), anterior regions (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.031), and full‐arch bridge cases (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; 0.0001). Patient satisfaction and OHIP‐C49 scores were favorable.ConclusionsImplant rehabilitation is predictable for patients with <jats:italic>WNT10A</jats:italic> mutations. However, increased MBL observed in homozygotes with severe tooth agenesis and in cases requiring extensive alveolar bone augmentation highlights the importance of genetic diagnosis prior to implant therapy in patients with severe tooth agenesis.","PeriodicalId":10455,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Implants Research","volume":"83 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Implants Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.14402","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectivesWNT10A mutations are associated with tooth agenesis. This study aimed to assess the clinical outcomes of dental implants in patients carrying WNT10A mutations with different molecular statuses and phenotypes over a long‐term follow‐up period.Materials and MethodsPatients with tooth agenesis were screened by whole‐exome sequencing (WES) from January 2010 to September 2023. Carriers of pathogenic WNT10A mutations who underwent subsequent dental implant therapy were evaluated.ResultsWES identified 66 patients with tooth agenesis carrying WNT10A mutations. Of these, 27 patients (11 males/16 females; mean age 19.6 years) met the inclusion criteria. Homozygotes had significantly more missing teeth (24.4 ± 3.8) than heterozygotes (10.9 ± 5.1, p < 0.0001) and compound heterozygotes (13.8 ± 3.5, p = 0.001). A total of 160 conventional implants were placed. Seven implants were lost in four patients before final prosthesis placement, resulting in overall failure rates of 14.8% at the subject level and 4.4% at the implant level. The 5‐year cumulative survival rate (range: 0.23–12.74 years) was 85.2% and 95.6% at the subject and implant levels, respectively. The mean marginal bone loss (MBL) was 0.80 mm (95% CI: 0.59–1.02). Subgroup analysis revealed higher MBL in homozygotes (p = 0.002), sites requiring extensive bone augmentation (p = 0.016), anterior regions (p = 0.031), and full‐arch bridge cases (p < 0.0001). Patient satisfaction and OHIP‐C49 scores were favorable.ConclusionsImplant rehabilitation is predictable for patients with WNT10A mutations. However, increased MBL observed in homozygotes with severe tooth agenesis and in cases requiring extensive alveolar bone augmentation highlights the importance of genetic diagnosis prior to implant therapy in patients with severe tooth agenesis.
携带不同分子状态和表型的WNT10A突变患者的牙种植康复:一项回顾性队列研究
目的研究wnt10a基因突变与牙齿发育有关。本研究旨在通过长期随访评估携带不同分子状态和表型的WNT10A突变患者种植牙的临床结果。材料与方法对2010年1月至2023年9月的牙齿发育不全患者进行全外显子组测序(WES)筛选。对WNT10A致病性突变携带者进行后续种植治疗。结果swes检测到66例携带WNT10A突变的牙齿发育不全患者。其中27例(男11例/女16例);平均年龄19.6岁)符合纳入标准。纯合子的缺牙率(24.4±3.8)明显高于杂合子(10.9±5.1),p <;0.0001)和复合杂合子(13.8±3.5,p = 0.001)。总共放置了160个常规种植体。4例患者在最终植入假体之前丢失了7个种植体,导致受试者水平的总体失败率为14.8%,种植体水平的总体失败率为4.4%。5年累积生存率(范围:0.23-12.74年)在受试者和植入物水平分别为85.2%和95.6%。平均边缘骨丢失(MBL)为0.80 mm (95% CI: 0.59-1.02)。亚组分析显示,纯合子(p = 0.002)、需要广泛骨增强的部位(p = 0.016)、前牙区(p = 0.031)和全弓桥病例(p <;0.0001)。患者满意度和OHIP - C49评分均较好。结论WNT10A突变患者的植物康复是可预测的。然而,在严重牙齿发育不全的纯合子和需要广泛的牙槽骨增强的病例中观察到MBL增加,这突出了在严重牙齿发育不全患者进行种植治疗之前进行基因诊断的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Oral Implants Research
Clinical Oral Implants Research 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
11.60%
发文量
149
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Oral Implants Research conveys scientific progress in the field of implant dentistry and its related areas to clinicians, teachers and researchers concerned with the application of this information for the benefit of patients in need of oral implants. The journal addresses itself to clinicians, general practitioners, periodontists, oral and maxillofacial surgeons and prosthodontists, as well as to teachers, academicians and scholars involved in the education of professionals and in the scientific promotion of the field of implant dentistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信