A Method for Validating PET and SPECT Cameras for Quantitative Clinical Imaging Trials Using Novel Radionuclides

Dale L. Bailey, Kathy P. Willowson, Graeme O’Keefe, Steven Goodman, Shaun Patford, George McGill, David A. Pattison, Andrew M. Scott
{"title":"A Method for Validating PET and SPECT Cameras for Quantitative Clinical Imaging Trials Using Novel Radionuclides","authors":"Dale L. Bailey, Kathy P. Willowson, Graeme O’Keefe, Steven Goodman, Shaun Patford, George McGill, David A. Pattison, Andrew M. Scott","doi":"10.2967/jnumed.124.268578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Our aim is to report methodology that has been developed to calibrate and verify PET and SPECT quantitative image accuracy and quality assurance for use with nonstandard radionuclides, especially with longer half-lives, in clinical imaging trials. <strong>Methods:</strong> Procedures have been developed for quantitative PET and SPECT image calibration for use in clinical trials. The protocol uses a 3-step approach: check quantitative accuracy with a previously calibrated radionuclide in a simple geometry, check the novel trial radionuclide in the same geometry, and check the novel radionuclide in a more challenging, complex geometry (the National Electrical Manufacturers Association [NEMA] NU-2 International Electrotechnical Commission [IEC] image-quality phantom). The radionuclides used in the trial as an example are <sup>124</sup>I (PET) and <sup>131</sup>I (SPECT). In both cases, whole-body tomographic SPECT and PET imaging with accompanying low-dose CT are required. PET accuracy is based on calibrating the dose calibrator to produce quantitative images for radionuclides other than <sup>18</sup>F, with all images reconstructed on each individual site’s PET systems. For SPECT, an independent sensitivity measurement is made and then used to calibrate the SPECT images reconstructed at the core laboratory. After calibration, the final testing for both PET and SPECT uses the NEMA NU-2 IEC image-quality phantom to derive several metrics including quantitative accuracy based on an average SUV (SUV<sub>avg</sub>). <strong>Results:</strong> Using the method described, 7 sites in Australia have been qualified for 10 PET/CT scanners using <sup>124</sup>I imaging and 8 SPECT/CT systems for <sup>131</sup>I. One PET/CT system was found to give a result outside the specification of an SUV<sub>avg</sub> of 1.0 ± 0.05. All SPECT/CT systems gave an SUV<sub>avg</sub> accurate to within ±10% (SUV<sub>mean</sub>, 1.0 ± 0.1) of the true value for reconstructed radioactivity concentration in Bq/cm<sup>3</sup>. <strong>Conclusion:</strong> A general methodology has been developed to calibrate and validate PET and SPECT systems for quantitative imaging in clinical trials. The preparation of the test objects and the procedures is relatively simple and can generally be implemented by the staff at the site of the imaging center with the equipment supplied by the clinical trials organization.</p>","PeriodicalId":22820,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Nuclear Medicine","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Nuclear Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.268578","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Our aim is to report methodology that has been developed to calibrate and verify PET and SPECT quantitative image accuracy and quality assurance for use with nonstandard radionuclides, especially with longer half-lives, in clinical imaging trials. Methods: Procedures have been developed for quantitative PET and SPECT image calibration for use in clinical trials. The protocol uses a 3-step approach: check quantitative accuracy with a previously calibrated radionuclide in a simple geometry, check the novel trial radionuclide in the same geometry, and check the novel radionuclide in a more challenging, complex geometry (the National Electrical Manufacturers Association [NEMA] NU-2 International Electrotechnical Commission [IEC] image-quality phantom). The radionuclides used in the trial as an example are 124I (PET) and 131I (SPECT). In both cases, whole-body tomographic SPECT and PET imaging with accompanying low-dose CT are required. PET accuracy is based on calibrating the dose calibrator to produce quantitative images for radionuclides other than 18F, with all images reconstructed on each individual site’s PET systems. For SPECT, an independent sensitivity measurement is made and then used to calibrate the SPECT images reconstructed at the core laboratory. After calibration, the final testing for both PET and SPECT uses the NEMA NU-2 IEC image-quality phantom to derive several metrics including quantitative accuracy based on an average SUV (SUVavg). Results: Using the method described, 7 sites in Australia have been qualified for 10 PET/CT scanners using 124I imaging and 8 SPECT/CT systems for 131I. One PET/CT system was found to give a result outside the specification of an SUVavg of 1.0 ± 0.05. All SPECT/CT systems gave an SUVavg accurate to within ±10% (SUVmean, 1.0 ± 0.1) of the true value for reconstructed radioactivity concentration in Bq/cm3. Conclusion: A general methodology has been developed to calibrate and validate PET and SPECT systems for quantitative imaging in clinical trials. The preparation of the test objects and the procedures is relatively simple and can generally be implemented by the staff at the site of the imaging center with the equipment supplied by the clinical trials organization.

一种新型放射性核素用于定量临床成像试验的PET和SPECT相机验证方法
我们的目的是报告已经开发的方法,用于校准和验证PET和SPECT定量图像的准确性和质量保证,用于非标准放射性核素,特别是半衰期较长的放射性核素,在临床成像试验中。方法:已开发出用于临床试验的定量PET和SPECT图像校准程序。该方案采用三步方法:使用先前校准的简单几何形状的放射性核素检查定量准确性,检查相同几何形状的新型试验放射性核素,并在更具挑战性的复杂几何形状(美国国家电气制造商协会[NEMA] NU-2国际电工委员会[IEC]图像质量模型)中检查新型放射性核素。试验中使用的放射性核素为124I (PET)和131I (SPECT)。在这两种情况下,都需要全身断层扫描SPECT和PET成像,并伴有低剂量CT。PET精度是基于校准剂量校准器来产生除18F以外的放射性核素的定量图像,所有图像都在每个站点的PET系统上重建。对于SPECT,进行了独立的灵敏度测量,然后用于校准在核心实验室重建的SPECT图像。校准后,PET和SPECT的最终测试使用NEMA NU-2 IEC图像质量幻象来得出几个指标,包括基于平均SUV (SUVavg)的定量精度。结果:使用所描述的方法,澳大利亚的7个站点已获得10台使用124I成像的PET/CT扫描仪和8台使用131I成像的SPECT/CT系统的资格。发现一个PET/CT系统给出的结果超出了SUVavg 1.0±0.05的规格。所有SPECT/CT系统给出的SUVavg精确到重建放射性浓度(Bq/cm3)真值的±10% (SUVmean, 1.0±0.1)。结论:一种通用的方法已经开发出来,用于校准和验证PET和SPECT系统在临床试验中的定量成像。试验对象和程序的制备相对简单,一般可由成像中心现场工作人员使用临床试验组织提供的设备实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信