Comparison of Erosion Characteristics in Complex Pipeline Configurations Using CFD–DEM: A Study on Bends, Reducers, and Tee-Reducers

IF 3.8 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Ming Pan, Zhiquan Wang, Lijing Mu, Cenfan Liu, Xizhong Chen
{"title":"Comparison of Erosion Characteristics in Complex Pipeline Configurations Using CFD–DEM: A Study on Bends, Reducers, and Tee-Reducers","authors":"Ming Pan, Zhiquan Wang, Lijing Mu, Cenfan Liu, Xizhong Chen","doi":"10.1021/acs.iecr.4c04385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pipeline erosion poses critical challenges to safety and efficiency in many industries, with bends being the most commonly studied components due to their frequent application in pipeline layouts. However, other key geometries such as reducers and tees are also widely employed and prone to erosion, yet their erosion behavior remains less understood. This study investigates and compares erosion patterns in these components using a computational fluid dynamics–discrete element method (CFD–DEM) approach. Flow characteristics, particle dynamics, and erosion ratios are analyzed under various gas velocities and particle sizes. Findings reveal that while higher gas velocities increase erosion in all geometries, bends are particularly vulnerable due to centrifugal forces concentrating impacts on the outer wall. In contrast, reducers experience significantly lower erosion ratios, as their narrowing design reduces particle-wall collisions. These insights are valuable for optimizing pipeline design and enhancing durability in industrial applications.","PeriodicalId":39,"journal":{"name":"Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.4c04385","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pipeline erosion poses critical challenges to safety and efficiency in many industries, with bends being the most commonly studied components due to their frequent application in pipeline layouts. However, other key geometries such as reducers and tees are also widely employed and prone to erosion, yet their erosion behavior remains less understood. This study investigates and compares erosion patterns in these components using a computational fluid dynamics–discrete element method (CFD–DEM) approach. Flow characteristics, particle dynamics, and erosion ratios are analyzed under various gas velocities and particle sizes. Findings reveal that while higher gas velocities increase erosion in all geometries, bends are particularly vulnerable due to centrifugal forces concentrating impacts on the outer wall. In contrast, reducers experience significantly lower erosion ratios, as their narrowing design reduces particle-wall collisions. These insights are valuable for optimizing pipeline design and enhancing durability in industrial applications.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1467
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: ndustrial & Engineering Chemistry, with variations in title and format, has been published since 1909 by the American Chemical Society. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research is a weekly publication that reports industrial and academic research in the broad fields of applied chemistry and chemical engineering with special focus on fundamentals, processes, and products.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信