PET-Based Risk Stratification in Primary Mediastinal B-Cell Lymphoma: A Comparative Analysis of Different Segmentation Methods in the IELSG37 Trial Patient Cohort

Luca Ceriani, Lisa Milan, Maria Cristina Pirosa, Maurizio Martelli, Teresa Ruberto, Luciano Cascione, Peter W.M. Johnson, Andrew J. Davies, Giovannino Ciccone, Emanuele Zucca
{"title":"PET-Based Risk Stratification in Primary Mediastinal B-Cell Lymphoma: A Comparative Analysis of Different Segmentation Methods in the IELSG37 Trial Patient Cohort","authors":"Luca Ceriani, Lisa Milan, Maria Cristina Pirosa, Maurizio Martelli, Teresa Ruberto, Luciano Cascione, Peter W.M. Johnson, Andrew J. Davies, Giovannino Ciccone, Emanuele Zucca","doi":"10.2967/jnumed.124.268874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Standardizing tumor measurement on <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET is crucial for the routine clinical use of powerful PET-derived lymphoma prognostic factors such as metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG). The recent proposal of an SUV of 4 as a new reference segmentation threshold for most aggressive lymphomas may homogenize volume-based metrics and facilitate their clinical application. <strong>Methods:</strong> This study compared MTV and TLG in primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) patients estimated using an SUV of 4 and the current threshold at 25% of SUV<sub>max</sub>. Baseline PET metrics were evaluated in 501 PMBCL patients from the IELSG37 trial. <strong>Results:</strong> Median MTV and TLG estimated with the 25% of SUV<sub>max</sub> threshold were significantly lower than those obtained with the new reference threshold; however, an extremely high correlation was observed between the methods for both MTV (<em>r</em> = 0.95) and TLG (<em>r</em> = 0.99), resulting in superimposable prognostic power. <strong>Conclusion:</strong> These findings support the routine use of an SUV of 4 for volumetric measurements in PMBCL.</p>","PeriodicalId":22820,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Nuclear Medicine","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Nuclear Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.268874","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Standardizing tumor measurement on 18F-FDG PET is crucial for the routine clinical use of powerful PET-derived lymphoma prognostic factors such as metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG). The recent proposal of an SUV of 4 as a new reference segmentation threshold for most aggressive lymphomas may homogenize volume-based metrics and facilitate their clinical application. Methods: This study compared MTV and TLG in primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) patients estimated using an SUV of 4 and the current threshold at 25% of SUVmax. Baseline PET metrics were evaluated in 501 PMBCL patients from the IELSG37 trial. Results: Median MTV and TLG estimated with the 25% of SUVmax threshold were significantly lower than those obtained with the new reference threshold; however, an extremely high correlation was observed between the methods for both MTV (r = 0.95) and TLG (r = 0.99), resulting in superimposable prognostic power. Conclusion: These findings support the routine use of an SUV of 4 for volumetric measurements in PMBCL.

基于pet的原发性纵隔b细胞淋巴瘤风险分层:IELSG37试验患者队列中不同分割方法的比较分析
标准化18F-FDG PET的肿瘤测量对于常规临床使用PET衍生淋巴瘤预后因素如肿瘤代谢体积(MTV)和病灶总糖酵解(TLG)至关重要。最近提出的SUV 4作为大多数侵袭性淋巴瘤的新参考分割阈值,可能会使基于体积的指标均匀化,并促进其临床应用。方法:本研究比较了原发性纵隔b细胞淋巴瘤(PMBCL)患者的MTV和TLG,使用SUV为4,当前阈值为SUVmax的25%。在IELSG37试验的501名PMBCL患者中评估了基线PET指标。结果:25% SUVmax阈值估计的中位MTV和TLG显著低于新参考阈值;然而,在MTV (r = 0.95)和TLG (r = 0.99)的方法之间观察到极高的相关性,导致重叠的预后能力。结论:这些发现支持在PMBCL中常规使用4的SUV进行体积测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信