Oxidative enzymes underlie tree species effects on soil organic carbon stocks: a common garden test with eight tree species

IF 9.8 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
Kailiang Shi, Yanzhen Sun, De-Hui Zeng, Zimeng Sheng, Yansong Zhang, Guigang Lin
{"title":"Oxidative enzymes underlie tree species effects on soil organic carbon stocks: a common garden test with eight tree species","authors":"Kailiang Shi, Yanzhen Sun, De-Hui Zeng, Zimeng Sheng, Yansong Zhang, Guigang Lin","doi":"10.1016/j.soilbio.2025.109715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tree species effects on soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks became a hot topic in soil science during the past decades. Increasing evidence has shown that tree species have contrasting effects on SOC stocks, yet the underlying mechanism remains incompletely understood. The decomposition control hypothesis states that tree species producing recalcitrant litter with low decomposability could facilitate SOC accumulation. In contrast, the formation control hypothesis argues that tree species producing labile litter, which can be efficiently transformed to soil organic matter by soil microbes, could increase SOC stocks. To unravel this controversy, we leveraged a 40-year-old common garden with replicated monoculture stands of eight tree species and examined relationships between leaf litter and fine root traits, soil bacterial and fungal community composition, four C-degrading enzymes, and SOC stocks. There was more than two-fold variation in SOC, particulate organic C (POC) and mineral-associated organic C (MAOC) concentrations among the eight tree species. Specific peroxidase and phenol oxidase activities explained more variation in POC and MAOC concentrations than leaf litter and fine root traits. Specific peroxidase activity was positively correlated with the relative abundance of fungi with genetic potential to produce peroxidase (Fungi_per) and acidobacteria, and specific phenol oxidase activity was positively correlated with relative abundance of actinobacteria. Tree species producing labile leaf and fine root litter characterized by rich nitrogen and poor lignin concentrations were associated with low relative abundance of Fungi_per and high relative abundance of actinobacteria. Collectively, our results suggest that oxidative enzymes that catalyze the decomposition of chemically recalcitrant compounds, and cause destabilization of mineral-bound organic matter, play critical roles in determining tree species effects on SOC stocks.","PeriodicalId":21888,"journal":{"name":"Soil Biology & Biochemistry","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Biology & Biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2025.109715","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tree species effects on soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks became a hot topic in soil science during the past decades. Increasing evidence has shown that tree species have contrasting effects on SOC stocks, yet the underlying mechanism remains incompletely understood. The decomposition control hypothesis states that tree species producing recalcitrant litter with low decomposability could facilitate SOC accumulation. In contrast, the formation control hypothesis argues that tree species producing labile litter, which can be efficiently transformed to soil organic matter by soil microbes, could increase SOC stocks. To unravel this controversy, we leveraged a 40-year-old common garden with replicated monoculture stands of eight tree species and examined relationships between leaf litter and fine root traits, soil bacterial and fungal community composition, four C-degrading enzymes, and SOC stocks. There was more than two-fold variation in SOC, particulate organic C (POC) and mineral-associated organic C (MAOC) concentrations among the eight tree species. Specific peroxidase and phenol oxidase activities explained more variation in POC and MAOC concentrations than leaf litter and fine root traits. Specific peroxidase activity was positively correlated with the relative abundance of fungi with genetic potential to produce peroxidase (Fungi_per) and acidobacteria, and specific phenol oxidase activity was positively correlated with relative abundance of actinobacteria. Tree species producing labile leaf and fine root litter characterized by rich nitrogen and poor lignin concentrations were associated with low relative abundance of Fungi_per and high relative abundance of actinobacteria. Collectively, our results suggest that oxidative enzymes that catalyze the decomposition of chemically recalcitrant compounds, and cause destabilization of mineral-bound organic matter, play critical roles in determining tree species effects on SOC stocks.
氧化酶是树种对土壤有机碳储量影响的基础:8种树种的普通园林试验
树种对土壤有机碳储量的影响是近几十年来土壤科学研究的热点问题。越来越多的证据表明,树种对土壤有机碳储量有不同的影响,但其潜在的机制尚不完全清楚。分解控制假说认为,产生难降解凋落物的树种可促进土壤有机碳的积累。相反,形成控制假说认为,产生可被土壤微生物有效转化为土壤有机质的不稳定凋落物的树种可以增加土壤有机碳储量。为了解决这一争议,我们利用一个有40年历史的普通花园,利用8个树种的复制单一林分,研究了凋落叶与细根性状、土壤细菌和真菌群落组成、4种c降解酶和SOC储量之间的关系。8个树种的有机碳、颗粒有机碳(POC)和矿物相关有机碳(MAOC)含量存在2倍以上的差异。特异过氧化物酶和酚氧化酶活性比凋落叶和细根性状更能解释POC和MAOC浓度的变化。特异过氧化物酶活性与有过氧化物酶遗传潜力的真菌(Fungi_per)和酸杆菌的相对丰度呈正相关,特异酚氧化酶活性与放线菌的相对丰度呈正相关。产易动叶和细根凋落物的树种,其富氮和低木质素浓度与真菌相对丰度低和放线菌相对丰度高相关。综上所述,我们的研究结果表明,氧化酶催化化学顽固性化合物的分解,并导致矿物结合有机质的不稳定,在决定树种对SOC储量的影响中起关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Soil Biology & Biochemistry
Soil Biology & Biochemistry 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
16.90
自引率
9.30%
发文量
312
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Soil Biology & Biochemistry publishes original research articles of international significance focusing on biological processes in soil and their applications to soil and environmental quality. Major topics include the ecology and biochemical processes of soil organisms, their effects on the environment, and interactions with plants. The journal also welcomes state-of-the-art reviews and discussions on contemporary research in soil biology and biochemistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信