Methane emissions from the Nord Stream subsea pipeline leaks

IF 50.5 1区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Nature Pub Date : 2025-01-15 DOI:10.1038/s41586-024-08396-8
Stephen J. Harris, Stefan Schwietzke, James L. France, Nataly Velandia Salinas, Tania Meixus Fernandez, Cynthia Randles, Luis Guanter, Itziar Irakulis-Loitxate, Andreea Calcan, Ilse Aben, Katarina Abrahamsson, Paul Balcombe, Antoine Berchet, Louise C. Biddle, Henry C. Bittig, Christian Böttcher, Timo Bouvard, Göran Broström, Valentin Bruch, Massimo Cassiani, Martyn P. Chipperfield, Philippe Ciais, Ellen Damm, Enrico Dammers, Hugo Denier van der Gon, Matthieu Dogniaux, Emily Dowd, François Dupouy, Sabine Eckhardt, Nikolaos Evangeliou, Wuhu Feng, Mengwei Jia, Fei Jiang, Andrea K. Kaiser-Weiss, Ines Kamoun, Brian J. Kerridge, Astrid Lampert, José Lana, Fei Li, Joannes D. Maasakkers, Jean-Philippe W. Maclean, Buhalqem Mamtimin, Julia Marshall, Gédéon Mauger, Anouar Mekkas, Christian Mielke, Martin Mohrmann, David P. Moore, Riccardo Nanni, Falk Pätzold, Isabelle Pison, Ignacio Pisso, Stephen M. Platt, Raphaël Préa, Bastien Y. Queste, Michel Ramonet, Gregor Rehder, John J. Remedios, Friedemann Reum, Anke Roiger, Norbert Schmidbauer, Richard Siddans, Anusha Sunkisala, Rona L. Thompson, Daniel J. Varon, Lucy J. Ventress, Chris Wilson, Yuzhong Zhang
{"title":"Methane emissions from the Nord Stream subsea pipeline leaks","authors":"Stephen J. Harris, Stefan Schwietzke, James L. France, Nataly Velandia Salinas, Tania Meixus Fernandez, Cynthia Randles, Luis Guanter, Itziar Irakulis-Loitxate, Andreea Calcan, Ilse Aben, Katarina Abrahamsson, Paul Balcombe, Antoine Berchet, Louise C. Biddle, Henry C. Bittig, Christian Böttcher, Timo Bouvard, Göran Broström, Valentin Bruch, Massimo Cassiani, Martyn P. Chipperfield, Philippe Ciais, Ellen Damm, Enrico Dammers, Hugo Denier van der Gon, Matthieu Dogniaux, Emily Dowd, François Dupouy, Sabine Eckhardt, Nikolaos Evangeliou, Wuhu Feng, Mengwei Jia, Fei Jiang, Andrea K. Kaiser-Weiss, Ines Kamoun, Brian J. Kerridge, Astrid Lampert, José Lana, Fei Li, Joannes D. Maasakkers, Jean-Philippe W. Maclean, Buhalqem Mamtimin, Julia Marshall, Gédéon Mauger, Anouar Mekkas, Christian Mielke, Martin Mohrmann, David P. Moore, Riccardo Nanni, Falk Pätzold, Isabelle Pison, Ignacio Pisso, Stephen M. Platt, Raphaël Préa, Bastien Y. Queste, Michel Ramonet, Gregor Rehder, John J. Remedios, Friedemann Reum, Anke Roiger, Norbert Schmidbauer, Richard Siddans, Anusha Sunkisala, Rona L. Thompson, Daniel J. Varon, Lucy J. Ventress, Chris Wilson, Yuzhong Zhang","doi":"10.1038/s41586-024-08396-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The amount of methane released to the atmosphere from the Nord Stream subsea pipeline leaks remains uncertain, as reflected in a wide range of estimates<sup>1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18</sup>. A lack of information regarding the temporal variation in atmospheric emissions has made it challenging to reconcile pipeline volumetric (bottom-up) estimates<sup>1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8</sup> with measurement-based (top-down) estimates<sup>8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18</sup>. Here we simulate pipeline rupture emission rates and integrate these with methane dissolution and sea-surface outgassing estimates<sup>9,10</sup> to model the evolution of atmospheric emissions from the leaks. We verify our modelled atmospheric emissions by comparing them with top-down point-in-time emission-rate estimates and cumulative emission estimates derived from airborne<sup>11</sup>, satellite<sup>8,12,13,14</sup> and tall tower data. We obtain consistency between our modelled atmospheric emissions and top-down estimates and find that 465 ± 20 thousand metric tons of methane were emitted to the atmosphere. Although, to our knowledge, this represents the largest recorded amount of methane released from a single transient event, it is equivalent to 0.1% of anthropogenic methane emissions for 2022. The impact of the leaks on the global atmospheric methane budget brings into focus the numerous other anthropogenic methane sources that require mitigation globally. Our analysis demonstrates that diverse, complementary measurement approaches are needed to quantify methane emissions in support of the Global Methane Pledge<sup>19</sup>.</p>","PeriodicalId":18787,"journal":{"name":"Nature","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":50.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-08396-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The amount of methane released to the atmosphere from the Nord Stream subsea pipeline leaks remains uncertain, as reflected in a wide range of estimates1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18. A lack of information regarding the temporal variation in atmospheric emissions has made it challenging to reconcile pipeline volumetric (bottom-up) estimates1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 with measurement-based (top-down) estimates8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18. Here we simulate pipeline rupture emission rates and integrate these with methane dissolution and sea-surface outgassing estimates9,10 to model the evolution of atmospheric emissions from the leaks. We verify our modelled atmospheric emissions by comparing them with top-down point-in-time emission-rate estimates and cumulative emission estimates derived from airborne11, satellite8,12,13,14 and tall tower data. We obtain consistency between our modelled atmospheric emissions and top-down estimates and find that 465 ± 20 thousand metric tons of methane were emitted to the atmosphere. Although, to our knowledge, this represents the largest recorded amount of methane released from a single transient event, it is equivalent to 0.1% of anthropogenic methane emissions for 2022. The impact of the leaks on the global atmospheric methane budget brings into focus the numerous other anthropogenic methane sources that require mitigation globally. Our analysis demonstrates that diverse, complementary measurement approaches are needed to quantify methane emissions in support of the Global Methane Pledge19.

Abstract Image

北溪海底管道泄漏造成的甲烷排放
从Nord Stream海底管道泄漏释放到大气中的甲烷量仍然不确定,这反映在广泛的估计范围1、2、3、4、5、6、7、8、9、10、11、12、13、14、15、16、17、18。由于缺乏关于大气排放的时间变化的信息,因此很难将管道体积(自下而上)估计1、2、3、4、5、6、7、8与基于测量的(自上而下)估计8、9、10、11、12、13、14、15、16、17、18相协调。在这里,我们模拟了管道破裂排放率,并将这些排放率与甲烷溶解和海面脱气估计相结合9,10,以模拟泄漏引起的大气排放的演变。我们通过将模拟的大气排放与自上而下的时间点排放率估计值和来自机载11、卫星8、12、13、14和高塔数据的累积排放估计值进行比较,来验证我们的大气排放模型。我们在模拟的大气排放和自上而下的估计之间获得了一致性,并发现465±2万吨甲烷被排放到大气中。尽管据我们所知,这代表了单次瞬态事件释放的最大甲烷量,但它相当于2022年人为甲烷排放量的0.1%。泄漏对全球大气甲烷收支的影响使需要在全球范围内减缓的众多其他人为甲烷源成为焦点。我们的分析表明,需要多种互补的测量方法来量化甲烷排放,以支持全球甲烷承诺19。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nature
Nature 综合性期刊-综合性期刊
CiteScore
90.00
自引率
1.20%
发文量
3652
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Nature is a prestigious international journal that publishes peer-reviewed research in various scientific and technological fields. The selection of articles is based on criteria such as originality, importance, interdisciplinary relevance, timeliness, accessibility, elegance, and surprising conclusions. In addition to showcasing significant scientific advances, Nature delivers rapid, authoritative, insightful news, and interpretation of current and upcoming trends impacting science, scientists, and the broader public. The journal serves a dual purpose: firstly, to promptly share noteworthy scientific advances and foster discussions among scientists, and secondly, to ensure the swift dissemination of scientific results globally, emphasizing their significance for knowledge, culture, and daily life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信