Ecological and anthropogenic drivers of local extinction and colonization of giant pandas over the past 30 years

IF 4.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Ecology Pub Date : 2025-01-15 DOI:10.1002/ecy.4507
Junfeng Tang, Ronald R. Swaisgood, Megan A. Owen, Xuzhe Zhao, Wei Wei, Mingsheng Hong, Hong Zhou, Jindong Zhang, Zejun Zhang
{"title":"Ecological and anthropogenic drivers of local extinction and colonization of giant pandas over the past 30 years","authors":"Junfeng Tang,&nbsp;Ronald R. Swaisgood,&nbsp;Megan A. Owen,&nbsp;Xuzhe Zhao,&nbsp;Wei Wei,&nbsp;Mingsheng Hong,&nbsp;Hong Zhou,&nbsp;Jindong Zhang,&nbsp;Zejun Zhang","doi":"10.1002/ecy.4507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Understanding the patterns and drivers of species range shifts is essential to disentangle mechanisms driving species' responses to global change. Here, we quantified local extinction and colonization dynamics of giant pandas (<i>Ailuropoda melanoleuca</i>) using occurrence data collected by harnessing the labor of &gt;1000 workers and &gt;60,000 worker days for each of the three periods (TP1: 1985–1988, TP2: 1998–2002, and TP3: 2011–2014), and evaluated how these patterns were associated with (1) protected area, (2) local rarity/abundance, and (3) abiotic factors (i.e., climate, land-use, and topography). We documented a decreased rate (from 0.433 during TP1–TP2 to 0.317 during TP2–TP3) of local extinction and a relatively stable rate (from 0.060 during TP1–TP2 to 0.056 during TP2–TP3) of local colonization through time. Furthermore, the occupancy gains have exceeded losses by a ratio of approximately 1.5 to 1, illustrating an expansion of panda's range at a rate of 1408.3 km<sup>2</sup>/decade. We also found that pandas were more likely to become locally extinct outside of protected areas, when locally rare in surrounding areas, and when certain biotic conditions were not met (e.g., increased forest cover). Local colonization was less likely in areas with high local rarity, challenging biotic conditions and unprotected area status. As the network of panda reserves expanded and the forest matured, the relative importance of other factors such as climate, biotic factors, and land-use became more influential in determining patterns of local extinction and colonization. Our findings provide insights into the factors governing the expansion of panda's range and illustrate how the relative influence of biotic and abiotic factors can change over time, indicating that effective conservation intervention may be able to mitigate some of the negative impacts of climate change and habitat degradation. This insight extends beyond pandas and highlights the role of conservation interventions can play in building resilience under a changing climate.</p>","PeriodicalId":11484,"journal":{"name":"Ecology","volume":"106 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecy.4507","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding the patterns and drivers of species range shifts is essential to disentangle mechanisms driving species' responses to global change. Here, we quantified local extinction and colonization dynamics of giant pandas (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) using occurrence data collected by harnessing the labor of >1000 workers and >60,000 worker days for each of the three periods (TP1: 1985–1988, TP2: 1998–2002, and TP3: 2011–2014), and evaluated how these patterns were associated with (1) protected area, (2) local rarity/abundance, and (3) abiotic factors (i.e., climate, land-use, and topography). We documented a decreased rate (from 0.433 during TP1–TP2 to 0.317 during TP2–TP3) of local extinction and a relatively stable rate (from 0.060 during TP1–TP2 to 0.056 during TP2–TP3) of local colonization through time. Furthermore, the occupancy gains have exceeded losses by a ratio of approximately 1.5 to 1, illustrating an expansion of panda's range at a rate of 1408.3 km2/decade. We also found that pandas were more likely to become locally extinct outside of protected areas, when locally rare in surrounding areas, and when certain biotic conditions were not met (e.g., increased forest cover). Local colonization was less likely in areas with high local rarity, challenging biotic conditions and unprotected area status. As the network of panda reserves expanded and the forest matured, the relative importance of other factors such as climate, biotic factors, and land-use became more influential in determining patterns of local extinction and colonization. Our findings provide insights into the factors governing the expansion of panda's range and illustrate how the relative influence of biotic and abiotic factors can change over time, indicating that effective conservation intervention may be able to mitigate some of the negative impacts of climate change and habitat degradation. This insight extends beyond pandas and highlights the role of conservation interventions can play in building resilience under a changing climate.

过去30年大熊猫局部灭绝和殖民化的生态和人为驱动因素
了解物种分布范围变化的模式和驱动因素对于厘清物种应对全球变化的机制至关重要。在本文中,我们利用在三个时期(TP1:1985-1988 年;TP2:1998-2002 年;TP3:2011-2014 年)利用 1000 名工人和 60000 个工人日的劳动收集到的大熊猫(Ailuropoda melanoleuca)发生数据,量化了大熊猫在当地的灭绝和殖民动态,并评估了这些模式与(1)保护区、(2)当地稀有性/丰度和(3)非生物因素(即,气候、土地利用和地形)之间的关联、气候、土地利用和地形)相关。根据我们的记录,随着时间的推移,当地物种灭绝率有所下降(从 TP1-TP2 期间的 0.433 降至 TP2-TP3 期间的 0.317),而当地物种定殖率则相对稳定(从 TP1-TP2 期间的 0.060 降至 TP2-TP3 期间的 0.056)。此外,大熊猫的迁入增量与迁出增量之比约为 1.5:1,表明大熊猫的活动范围以每十年 1408.3 km2 的速度扩大。我们还发现,当大熊猫在保护区外、周边地区稀少以及某些生物条件未满足时(如森林覆盖率增加),大熊猫更有可能在当地灭绝。在当地稀有程度较高、生物条件具有挑战性以及处于非保护区状态的地区,大熊猫在当地定居的可能性较小。随着大熊猫保护区网络的扩大和森林的成熟,其他因素(如气候、生物因素和土地利用)的相对重要性在决定当地灭绝和定居模式方面的影响越来越大。我们的研究结果提供了有关大熊猫分布范围扩大的因素的见解,并说明了生物和非生物因素的相对影响如何随着时间的推移而变化,这表明有效的保护干预可能能够减轻气候变化和栖息地退化的一些负面影响。这一见解不仅适用于大熊猫,还强调了保护干预措施在不断变化的气候条件下建立恢复能力的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecology
Ecology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
332
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Ecology publishes articles that report on the basic elements of ecological research. Emphasis is placed on concise, clear articles documenting important ecological phenomena. The journal publishes a broad array of research that includes a rapidly expanding envelope of subject matter, techniques, approaches, and concepts: paleoecology through present-day phenomena; evolutionary, population, physiological, community, and ecosystem ecology, as well as biogeochemistry; inclusive of descriptive, comparative, experimental, mathematical, statistical, and interdisciplinary approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信