Early Dynamics of Portal Pressure Gradient After TIPS Insertion Predict Mortality

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
P. A. Reuken, A. Franz, T. H. Wirtz, C. Ripoll, R. Aschenbach, U. Teichgräber, M. R. Pollmanns, M. Kiehntopf, S. Keil, C. Kuhl, P. C. Schulze, C. Trautwein, T. Bruns, A. Stallmach, A. Zipprich
{"title":"Early Dynamics of Portal Pressure Gradient After TIPS Insertion Predict Mortality","authors":"P. A. Reuken, A. Franz, T. H. Wirtz, C. Ripoll, R. Aschenbach, U. Teichgräber, M. R. Pollmanns, M. Kiehntopf, S. Keil, C. Kuhl, P. C. Schulze, C. Trautwein, T. Bruns, A. Stallmach, A. Zipprich","doi":"10.1111/apt.18503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundTransjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement leads to a reduction in portal pressure and an improvement in survival in patients with recurrent and refractory ascites and variceal haemorrhage. Prediction of post‐TIPS survival is primarily determined by factors identified before the TIPS procedure, as data collected during or after TIPS implantation are limited. The aim of the study was to evaluate the influence of early hemodynamic changes after TIPS placement on survival, in order to refine post TIPS management.MethodsIn this prospective bicentric study, consecutive patients (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 105) undergoing TIPS placement for ascites or variceal haemorrhage underwent measurement of portal pressure gradient (PPG) immediately at TIPS insertion (PPG0) and 24 h later (PPG24h) and the ΔPPG was calculated from PPG24h and PPG0 (ΔPPG = PPG24h‐PPG0). Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and uni‐ and multivariable regression analyses were conducted to identify survival predictors.ResultsPatients with lack of increased ΔPPG exhibited poorer 90‐day and 1‐year survival compared to patients with increased ΔPPG. This worse survival was independent of The Model for End‐Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score, Child‐Pugh score, bilirubin levels, creatinine and the Freiburg index of post‐TIPS survival (FIPS) &gt; 0.92. Among these patients with poorer outcome, elevated bilirubin (&gt; 25 μmol/L) further distinguished survivors from non‐survivors.ConclusionLack of increased ΔPPG post‐TIPS insertion identifies a high‐risk patient group with worse survival. We propose incorporating this second PPG measurement and determining ΔPPG into clinical practice to identify these patients early and tailor post‐TIPS patient care.","PeriodicalId":121,"journal":{"name":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.18503","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundTransjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement leads to a reduction in portal pressure and an improvement in survival in patients with recurrent and refractory ascites and variceal haemorrhage. Prediction of post‐TIPS survival is primarily determined by factors identified before the TIPS procedure, as data collected during or after TIPS implantation are limited. The aim of the study was to evaluate the influence of early hemodynamic changes after TIPS placement on survival, in order to refine post TIPS management.MethodsIn this prospective bicentric study, consecutive patients (n = 105) undergoing TIPS placement for ascites or variceal haemorrhage underwent measurement of portal pressure gradient (PPG) immediately at TIPS insertion (PPG0) and 24 h later (PPG24h) and the ΔPPG was calculated from PPG24h and PPG0 (ΔPPG = PPG24h‐PPG0). Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and uni‐ and multivariable regression analyses were conducted to identify survival predictors.ResultsPatients with lack of increased ΔPPG exhibited poorer 90‐day and 1‐year survival compared to patients with increased ΔPPG. This worse survival was independent of The Model for End‐Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score, Child‐Pugh score, bilirubin levels, creatinine and the Freiburg index of post‐TIPS survival (FIPS) > 0.92. Among these patients with poorer outcome, elevated bilirubin (> 25 μmol/L) further distinguished survivors from non‐survivors.ConclusionLack of increased ΔPPG post‐TIPS insertion identifies a high‐risk patient group with worse survival. We propose incorporating this second PPG measurement and determining ΔPPG into clinical practice to identify these patients early and tailor post‐TIPS patient care.
TIPS插入后门静脉压力梯度的早期动态预测死亡率
背景:经颈静脉肝内门静脉系统分流术(TIPS)可降低门静脉压力,提高复发性难治性腹水和静脉曲张出血患者的生存率。由于TIPS植入期间或之后收集的数据有限,因此预测TIPS植入后的生存主要取决于TIPS手术前确定的因素。本研究的目的是评估TIPS放置后早期血流动力学变化对生存的影响,以完善TIPS后的管理。方法在这项前瞻性双中心研究中,连续105例因腹水或静脉曲张出血而接受TIPS置入的患者(n = 105)在TIPS置入时(PPG0)和24小时后(ppg24小时)测量门静脉压力梯度(PPG),并根据ppg24小时和PPG0计算ΔPPG (ΔPPG = ppg24小时‐PPG0)。通过Kaplan-Meier生存分析和单变量和多变量回归分析来确定生存预测因子。结果与ΔPPG升高的患者相比,ΔPPG缺乏升高的患者表现出较差的90天和1年生存率。这种较差的生存与终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分、Child - Pugh评分、胆红素水平、肌酐和TIPS后生存的Freiburg指数(FIPS)无关。0.92. 在这些预后较差的患者中,胆红素升高(>;25 μmol/L)进一步区分了幸存者和非幸存者。结论:TIPS后不增加ΔPPG插入是生存率较差的高危患者组。我们建议将第二次PPG测量和确定ΔPPG纳入临床实践,以早期识别这些患者并定制TIPS后患者护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
7.90%
发文量
527
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics is a global pharmacology journal focused on the impact of drugs on the human gastrointestinal and hepato-biliary systems. It covers a diverse range of topics, often with immediate clinical relevance to its readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信