Association of Alzheimer’s Disease Polygenic Risk Score with Concussion Severity and Recovery Metrics

IF 9.3 1区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Kaitlyn M. Dybing, Thomas W. McAllister, Yu-Chien Wu, Brenna C. McDonald, Steven P. Broglio, Jason P. Mihalik, Kevin M. Guskiewicz, Joshua T. Goldman, Jonathan C. Jackson, Andrew J. Saykin, Shannon L. Risacher, Kelly N. H. Nudelman
{"title":"Association of Alzheimer’s Disease Polygenic Risk Score with Concussion Severity and Recovery Metrics","authors":"Kaitlyn M. Dybing, Thomas W. McAllister, Yu-Chien Wu, Brenna C. McDonald, Steven P. Broglio, Jason P. Mihalik, Kevin M. Guskiewicz, Joshua T. Goldman, Jonathan C. Jackson, Andrew J. Saykin, Shannon L. Risacher, Kelly N. H. Nudelman","doi":"10.1007/s40279-024-02150-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Identification of genetic alleles associated with both Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and concussion severity/recovery could help explain the association between concussion and elevated dementia risk. However, there has been little investigation into whether AD risk genes associate with concussion severity/recovery, and the limited findings are mixed.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Objective</h3><p>We used AD polygenic risk scores (PRS) and <i>APOE</i> genotypes to investigate any such associations in the NCAA-DoD Grand Alliance CARE Consortium (CARE) dataset.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>We assessed six concussion outcomes in 931 participants, including two recovery measures (number of days to asymptomatic and to return to play (RTP)) and four severity measures (scores on SAC and BESS, SCAT symptom severity and total number of symptoms). We calculated the PRS using a published score and performed multiple linear regression to assess the relationship of the PRS with outcomes. We also used ANOVAs, <i>t</i>-tests, and chi-square tests to examine outcomes by <i>APOE</i> genotype.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Higher PRS was associated with longer injury to RTP time in the normal RTP (&lt; 24 days) subgroup (<i>p</i> = 0.024). A one standard deviation increase in the PRS resulted in a 9.89 hour increase to RTP time. This result was no longer significant after inclusion of covariates. There were no other consistently significant effects.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>Our findings suggest high AD genetic risk is not associated with more severe concussions or poor recovery in young adults. Future studies should attempt to replicate these findings in larger samples with longer follow-up using PRS calculated from diverse populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":21969,"journal":{"name":"Sports Medicine","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-024-02150-w","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Identification of genetic alleles associated with both Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and concussion severity/recovery could help explain the association between concussion and elevated dementia risk. However, there has been little investigation into whether AD risk genes associate with concussion severity/recovery, and the limited findings are mixed.

Objective

We used AD polygenic risk scores (PRS) and APOE genotypes to investigate any such associations in the NCAA-DoD Grand Alliance CARE Consortium (CARE) dataset.

Methods

We assessed six concussion outcomes in 931 participants, including two recovery measures (number of days to asymptomatic and to return to play (RTP)) and four severity measures (scores on SAC and BESS, SCAT symptom severity and total number of symptoms). We calculated the PRS using a published score and performed multiple linear regression to assess the relationship of the PRS with outcomes. We also used ANOVAs, t-tests, and chi-square tests to examine outcomes by APOE genotype.

Results

Higher PRS was associated with longer injury to RTP time in the normal RTP (< 24 days) subgroup (p = 0.024). A one standard deviation increase in the PRS resulted in a 9.89 hour increase to RTP time. This result was no longer significant after inclusion of covariates. There were no other consistently significant effects.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest high AD genetic risk is not associated with more severe concussions or poor recovery in young adults. Future studies should attempt to replicate these findings in larger samples with longer follow-up using PRS calculated from diverse populations.

阿尔茨海默病多基因风险评分与脑震荡严重程度和恢复指标的关系
背景:确定与阿尔茨海默病(AD)和脑震荡严重程度/恢复相关的基因等位基因有助于解释脑震荡与痴呆风险升高之间的关系。然而,关于AD风险基因是否与脑震荡严重程度/恢复相关的研究很少,而且有限的研究结果是混杂的。目的:我们使用AD多基因风险评分(PRS)和APOE基因型来调查NCAA-DoD大联盟CARE联盟(CARE)数据集中的任何此类关联。方法我们评估了931名参与者的6项脑震荡结局,包括2项恢复指标(无症状和恢复比赛天数(RTP))和4项严重程度指标(SAC和BESS评分、SCAT症状严重程度和症状总数)。我们使用已发表的评分来计算PRS,并进行多元线性回归来评估PRS与结果的关系。我们还使用方差分析、t检验和卡方检验来检验APOE基因型的结果。结果RTP正常亚组(<; 24天)RTP损伤时间越长,PRS越高(p = 0.024)。PRS每增加一个标准差,RTP时间就增加9.89小时。纳入协变量后,该结果不再显著。没有其他持续显著的影响。结论我们的研究结果表明,高AD遗传风险与年轻人更严重的脑震荡或恢复不良无关。未来的研究应该尝试在更大的样本和更长的随访中复制这些发现,使用从不同人群中计算的PRS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sports Medicine
Sports Medicine 医学-运动科学
CiteScore
18.40
自引率
5.10%
发文量
165
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Sports Medicine focuses on providing definitive and comprehensive review articles that interpret and evaluate current literature, aiming to offer insights into research findings in the sports medicine and exercise field. The journal covers major topics such as sports medicine and sports science, medical syndromes associated with sport and exercise, clinical medicine's role in injury prevention and treatment, exercise for rehabilitation and health, and the application of physiological and biomechanical principles to specific sports. Types of Articles: Review Articles: Definitive and comprehensive reviews that interpret and evaluate current literature to provide rationale for and application of research findings. Leading/Current Opinion Articles: Overviews of contentious or emerging issues in the field. Original Research Articles: High-quality research articles. Enhanced Features: Additional features like slide sets, videos, and animations aimed at increasing the visibility, readership, and educational value of the journal's content. Plain Language Summaries: Summaries accompanying articles to assist readers in understanding important medical advances. Peer Review Process: All manuscripts undergo peer review by international experts to ensure quality and rigor. The journal also welcomes Letters to the Editor, which will be considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信