Relationship between community characteristics and impact of calorie labeling on fast-food purchases

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Obesity Pub Date : 2025-01-14 DOI:10.1002/oby.24198
Roxanne Dupuis, Marie A. Bragg, Lloyd Heng, Emil Hafeez, Erilia Wu, Tod Mijanovich, Beth C. Weitzman, Pasquale E. Rummo, Brian Elbel
{"title":"Relationship between community characteristics and impact of calorie labeling on fast-food purchases","authors":"Roxanne Dupuis,&nbsp;Marie A. Bragg,&nbsp;Lloyd Heng,&nbsp;Emil Hafeez,&nbsp;Erilia Wu,&nbsp;Tod Mijanovich,&nbsp;Beth C. Weitzman,&nbsp;Pasquale E. Rummo,&nbsp;Brian Elbel","doi":"10.1002/oby.24198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>The objective of this study was to evaluate potential sources of heterogeneity in the effect of calorie labeling on fast-food purchases among restaurants located in areas with different neighborhood characteristics.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In a quasi-experimental design, using transaction data from 2329 Taco Bell restaurants across the United States between 2008 and 2014, we estimated the relationships of census tract-level income, racial and ethnic composition, and urbanicity with the impacts of calorie labeling on calories purchased per transaction.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Calorie labeling led to small, absolute reductions in calories purchased across all population subgroups, ranging between −9.3 calories (95% CI: −18.7 to 0.0) and −37.6 calories (95% CI: −41.6 to −33.7) 2 years after labeling implementation. We observed the largest difference in the effect of calorie labeling between restaurants located in rural compared with those located in high-density urban census tracts 2 years after implementation, with the effect of calorie labeling being three times larger in urban areas.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Fast-food calorie labeling led to small reductions in calories purchased across all population subgroups except for rural census tracts, with some subgroups experiencing a greater benefit.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":215,"journal":{"name":"Obesity","volume":"33 2","pages":"356-364"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/oby.24198","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The objective of this study was to evaluate potential sources of heterogeneity in the effect of calorie labeling on fast-food purchases among restaurants located in areas with different neighborhood characteristics.

Methods

In a quasi-experimental design, using transaction data from 2329 Taco Bell restaurants across the United States between 2008 and 2014, we estimated the relationships of census tract-level income, racial and ethnic composition, and urbanicity with the impacts of calorie labeling on calories purchased per transaction.

Results

Calorie labeling led to small, absolute reductions in calories purchased across all population subgroups, ranging between −9.3 calories (95% CI: −18.7 to 0.0) and −37.6 calories (95% CI: −41.6 to −33.7) 2 years after labeling implementation. We observed the largest difference in the effect of calorie labeling between restaurants located in rural compared with those located in high-density urban census tracts 2 years after implementation, with the effect of calorie labeling being three times larger in urban areas.

Conclusions

Fast-food calorie labeling led to small reductions in calories purchased across all population subgroups except for rural census tracts, with some subgroups experiencing a greater benefit.

社区特征与卡路里标签对快餐消费影响的关系
目的:本研究的目的是评估卡路里标签对位于不同社区特征地区的餐馆快餐消费影响的潜在异质性来源。方法:采用准实验设计,利用2008年至2014年美国2329家塔可钟餐厅的交易数据,估计人口普户区收入、种族和民族构成以及城市化程度与卡路里标签对每笔交易购买卡路里的影响之间的关系。结果:卡路里标签导致所有人群亚组的卡路里购买量的绝对减少,在标签实施2年后的-9.3卡路里(95% CI: -18.7至0.0)和-37.6卡路里(95% CI: -41.6至-33.7)之间。我们观察到,在实施两年后,位于农村的餐馆与位于高密度城市人口普查区的餐馆之间的卡路里标签效果差异最大,其中卡路里标签在城市地区的效果是城市地区的三倍。结论:快餐卡路里标签导致除了农村人口普查区以外的所有人口亚组中购买的卡路里都有小幅减少,其中一些亚组受益更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Obesity
Obesity 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
1.40%
发文量
261
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Obesity is the official journal of The Obesity Society and is the premier source of information for increasing knowledge, fostering translational research from basic to population science, and promoting better treatment for people with obesity. Obesity publishes important peer-reviewed research and cutting-edge reviews, commentaries, and public health and medical developments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信