Ling-Ying Wang, Zi-Yi Hu, Meng-Lin Tang, Xiu-Ying Hu
{"title":"Physical Restraint in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: A Cross-Sectional, Observational Study in China.","authors":"Ling-Ying Wang, Zi-Yi Hu, Meng-Lin Tang, Xiu-Ying Hu","doi":"10.1097/jnr.0000000000000653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research data on the extent of and protocols related to physical restraint (PR) in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) are scarce. Most previous studies in China on this topic have focused on the prevalence, reasons, and background of PR use among adult patients.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study was designed to delineate the application of PR and the factors associated with PR use in PICUs in China.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted in one PICU at West China Hospital, Sichuan University, from January 2020 to December 2020. A total of 1,086 pediatric patients in the PICU were included in this study. Data collection was performed over 11 months, utilizing PR observation forms and patient records. Descriptive statistical analysis was used to obtain the data, and logistic regression models were used to analyze the independent risk factors for PR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1,086 participants, 750 (69.1%) experienced being restrained, and 83.5% of the restrained participants who were pediatric patients were restrained for more than 50% of their time during their PICU stay. The results of logistic regression analysis identified age (1-6 years: OR = 2.090, 95% CI [1.508, 2.897], p < .001; 7-17 years: OR = 0.523, 95% CI [0.358, 0.765], p = .001), use of mechanical ventilation ( OR = 2.126, 95% CI [1.480, 3.055], p < .001), use of drainage tubes ( OR = 1.916, 95% CI [1.445, 2.541], p < .001), and sedation ( OR = 1.494, 95% CI [1.101, 2.026], p = .010) as significantly correlated with the use of PR in the PICU. For the 750 patients who experienced being restrained, PR initiation was documented with a written medical order, and in 604 cases (80.5%), the restraints were removed without similar documentation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of PR is common in PICUs in China, with more than half of pediatric patients being restrained during their stay. Age, mechanical ventilation, use of drainage tubes, and use of sedative drugs were identified as significantly associated with PR use. Developing standardized procedures/guidelines for PR use in Chinese PICUs and enhancing medical staff education on PR practices are imperative.</p>","PeriodicalId":94242,"journal":{"name":"The journal of nursing research : JNR","volume":" ","pages":"e373"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of nursing research : JNR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/jnr.0000000000000653","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Research data on the extent of and protocols related to physical restraint (PR) in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) are scarce. Most previous studies in China on this topic have focused on the prevalence, reasons, and background of PR use among adult patients.
Purpose: This study was designed to delineate the application of PR and the factors associated with PR use in PICUs in China.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in one PICU at West China Hospital, Sichuan University, from January 2020 to December 2020. A total of 1,086 pediatric patients in the PICU were included in this study. Data collection was performed over 11 months, utilizing PR observation forms and patient records. Descriptive statistical analysis was used to obtain the data, and logistic regression models were used to analyze the independent risk factors for PR.
Results: Of the 1,086 participants, 750 (69.1%) experienced being restrained, and 83.5% of the restrained participants who were pediatric patients were restrained for more than 50% of their time during their PICU stay. The results of logistic regression analysis identified age (1-6 years: OR = 2.090, 95% CI [1.508, 2.897], p < .001; 7-17 years: OR = 0.523, 95% CI [0.358, 0.765], p = .001), use of mechanical ventilation ( OR = 2.126, 95% CI [1.480, 3.055], p < .001), use of drainage tubes ( OR = 1.916, 95% CI [1.445, 2.541], p < .001), and sedation ( OR = 1.494, 95% CI [1.101, 2.026], p = .010) as significantly correlated with the use of PR in the PICU. For the 750 patients who experienced being restrained, PR initiation was documented with a written medical order, and in 604 cases (80.5%), the restraints were removed without similar documentation.
Conclusions: The use of PR is common in PICUs in China, with more than half of pediatric patients being restrained during their stay. Age, mechanical ventilation, use of drainage tubes, and use of sedative drugs were identified as significantly associated with PR use. Developing standardized procedures/guidelines for PR use in Chinese PICUs and enhancing medical staff education on PR practices are imperative.
背景:关于儿童重症监护病房(picu)物理约束(PR)的范围和相关方案的研究数据很少。国内关于这一主题的研究大多集中在成人患者中PR使用的流行程度、原因和背景。目的:本研究旨在描述PR在中国picu中的应用及其相关因素。方法:于2020年1月至2020年12月在四川大学华西医院1间PICU进行横断面研究。本研究共纳入了1086例PICU儿科患者。数据收集超过11个月,利用PR观察表和患者记录。结果:1086例患者中,有750例(69.1%)曾被约束,其中83.5%的儿童患者在PICU住院期间被约束的时间超过50%。logistic回归分析结果确定年龄(1-6岁:OR = 2.090, 95% CI [1.508, 2.897], p < .001;7-17岁:OR = 0.523, 95% CI [0.358, 0.765], p = 0.001),使用机械通气(OR = 2.126, 95% CI [1.480, 3.055], p < 0.001),使用引流管(OR = 1.916, 95% CI [1.445, 2.541], p < 0.001),镇静(OR = 1.494, 95% CI [1.101, 2.026], p = 0.010)与PICU中PR的使用显著相关。对于750名经历过束缚的患者,PR开始时有书面医疗命令记录,在604例(80.5%)中,没有类似的文件就解除了束缚。结论:在中国picu中,PR的使用很普遍,超过一半的儿科患者在住院期间受到限制。年龄、机械通气、使用引流管和使用镇静药物与PR使用显著相关。制定中国picu使用PR的标准化程序/指南,并加强医务人员PR实践的教育是当务之急。