Outcomes of simple gastroschisis surgical treatment in a highly specialized hospital.

E T Ávila Hernández, C Durán Castillo, C D Meza Nava, J Vargas Mancilla, M I Montes Rodríguez, A Patricia González, C Paque Bautista, G P Sosa Bustamante
{"title":"Outcomes of simple gastroschisis surgical treatment in a highly specialized hospital.","authors":"E T Ávila Hernández, C Durán Castillo, C D Meza Nava, J Vargas Mancilla, M I Montes Rodríguez, A Patricia González, C Paque Bautista, G P Sosa Bustamante","doi":"10.54847/cp.2025.01.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the outcomes of three surgical techniques in the management of simple gastroschisis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An observational, descriptive, retrospective, longitudinal study was carried out. Medical records of patients diagnosed with simple gastroschisis and treated with different surgical techniques -Simil-Exit, primary closure, and deferred closure- were reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>38 gastroschisis patients undergoing either the Simil-Exit (n= 10), the primary closure (n= 11), or the deferred closure (n= 17) techniques were analyzed. The Simil-Exit technique involved a shorter operating time than primary closure and deferred closure. Both Simil-Exit and primary closure patients required a shorter mechanical ventilation time, fewer days of parenteral nutrition, shorter time to oral feeding initiation, and a shorter hospital stay than deferred closure patients. The deferred closure technique had more frequent complications, such as sepsis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Simil-Exit and the primary closure techniques demonstrated favorable outcomes in patients with simple gastroschisis. In addition, the former involved shorter operating times, it required less exposure of the small bowel loops to the environment, it was easily reproducible, and it provided a better cosmetic result.</p>","PeriodicalId":94306,"journal":{"name":"Cirugia pediatrica : organo oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Cirugia Pediatrica","volume":"38 1","pages":"13-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cirugia pediatrica : organo oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Cirugia Pediatrica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54847/cp.2025.01.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the outcomes of three surgical techniques in the management of simple gastroschisis.

Materials and methods: An observational, descriptive, retrospective, longitudinal study was carried out. Medical records of patients diagnosed with simple gastroschisis and treated with different surgical techniques -Simil-Exit, primary closure, and deferred closure- were reviewed.

Results: 38 gastroschisis patients undergoing either the Simil-Exit (n= 10), the primary closure (n= 11), or the deferred closure (n= 17) techniques were analyzed. The Simil-Exit technique involved a shorter operating time than primary closure and deferred closure. Both Simil-Exit and primary closure patients required a shorter mechanical ventilation time, fewer days of parenteral nutrition, shorter time to oral feeding initiation, and a shorter hospital stay than deferred closure patients. The deferred closure technique had more frequent complications, such as sepsis.

Conclusions: The Simil-Exit and the primary closure techniques demonstrated favorable outcomes in patients with simple gastroschisis. In addition, the former involved shorter operating times, it required less exposure of the small bowel loops to the environment, it was easily reproducible, and it provided a better cosmetic result.

一家高度专业化医院的单纯性胃裂手术治疗效果。
目的:评价三种手术方法治疗单纯性胃裂的效果。材料和方法:采用观察性、描述性、回顾性、纵向研究。本文回顾了诊断为单纯性胃裂的患者的医疗记录,并对其进行了不同的手术技术-类似-退出、初级缝合和延期缝合。结果:我们分析了38例胃裂患者,分别采用了simili - exit (n= 10)、primary closure (n= 11)和deferred closure (n= 17)。与主闭包和延迟闭包相比,类似退出技术的操作时间更短。与延期闭锁患者相比,simili - exit和初次闭锁患者需要更短的机械通气时间、更短的肠外营养天数、更短的开始口服喂养时间和更短的住院时间。延迟闭合术有更常见的并发症,如败血症。结论:simi - exit和初级缝合技术在单纯性胃裂患者中表现出良好的效果。此外,前者的手术时间更短,需要较少的小肠环暴露于环境中,易于复制,并且提供更好的美容效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信