The Use of Connective Tissue Graft Wall as an Adjunct to Regenerative Treatment for Deep Intrabony Defects Associated with Gingival Recession: A Retrospective Case Series with 5-Year Follow-up.

Michel Bravard, Hom-Lay Wang, Kevimy Agossa
{"title":"The Use of Connective Tissue Graft Wall as an Adjunct to Regenerative Treatment for Deep Intrabony Defects Associated with Gingival Recession: A Retrospective Case Series with 5-Year Follow-up.","authors":"Michel Bravard, Hom-Lay Wang, Kevimy Agossa","doi":"10.11607/prd.7510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The adjunctive use of connective tissue grafts (CTGs) in the periodontal regeneration of intrabony defects has been proposed to prevent or limit postoperative gingival recession. However, there is limited evidence regarding the long-term clinical performance of this approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This article presents the five-year follow-up outcomes of a combination therapy using CTG, bone substitutes, and biologics for the treatment of deep intrabony defects associated with gingival recession. Twelve healthy, non-smoking patients with 12 deep intrabony defects participated in the study. These patients had a mean clinical attachment loss (CAL) of 9.9 ± 2.1 mm, a mean probing depth (PPD) of 7.8 ± 1.5 mm, and a mean buccal recession (REC) of 2.3 ± 1.8 mm at baseline, before= undergoing the described treatment regimen.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After five years, the mean clinical attachment level (CAL) gain was 5.7 ± 3.2 mm (p < 0.001), the mean reduction in probing pocket depth (PPD) was 5.1 ± 1.6 mm (p < 0.001), and the mean reduction in recession (REC) was 1.2 ± 2.1 mm (p = 0.07) Ninety-one percent of sites achieved CAL gain of ≥3 mm and PPD ≤ 4 mm. Compared to baseline, 7 out of 12 sites showed a REC reduction of ≥1 mm, while three sites remained stable, and two sites experienced an increase in gingival recession depth of 1 and 2 mm respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Within the limitations of this case series, periodontal regenerative therapy incorporating the adjunctive use of CTG showed to be effective for treating deep non-contained periodontal intrabony defects and respectively stabilize or slightly improve the gingival margin over five years.</p>","PeriodicalId":94231,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry","volume":"0 0","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.7510","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The adjunctive use of connective tissue grafts (CTGs) in the periodontal regeneration of intrabony defects has been proposed to prevent or limit postoperative gingival recession. However, there is limited evidence regarding the long-term clinical performance of this approach.

Methods: This article presents the five-year follow-up outcomes of a combination therapy using CTG, bone substitutes, and biologics for the treatment of deep intrabony defects associated with gingival recession. Twelve healthy, non-smoking patients with 12 deep intrabony defects participated in the study. These patients had a mean clinical attachment loss (CAL) of 9.9 ± 2.1 mm, a mean probing depth (PPD) of 7.8 ± 1.5 mm, and a mean buccal recession (REC) of 2.3 ± 1.8 mm at baseline, before= undergoing the described treatment regimen.

Results: After five years, the mean clinical attachment level (CAL) gain was 5.7 ± 3.2 mm (p < 0.001), the mean reduction in probing pocket depth (PPD) was 5.1 ± 1.6 mm (p < 0.001), and the mean reduction in recession (REC) was 1.2 ± 2.1 mm (p = 0.07) Ninety-one percent of sites achieved CAL gain of ≥3 mm and PPD ≤ 4 mm. Compared to baseline, 7 out of 12 sites showed a REC reduction of ≥1 mm, while three sites remained stable, and two sites experienced an increase in gingival recession depth of 1 and 2 mm respectively.

Conclusion: Within the limitations of this case series, periodontal regenerative therapy incorporating the adjunctive use of CTG showed to be effective for treating deep non-contained periodontal intrabony defects and respectively stabilize or slightly improve the gingival margin over five years.

使用结缔组织移植物壁作为辅助再生治疗与牙龈退缩相关的深部骨内缺损:回顾性病例系列5年随访。
背景:在骨内缺损的牙周再生中,结缔组织移植物(CTGs)的辅助应用已被提出,以防止或限制术后牙龈萎缩。然而,关于这种方法的长期临床表现的证据有限。方法:本文介绍了CTG、骨替代物和生物制剂联合治疗伴有牙龈萎缩的骨深部缺损的5年随访结果。12名健康、不吸烟、有12个骨内深部缺陷的患者参与了这项研究。在接受上述治疗方案之前,这些患者的平均临床附着损失(CAL)为9.9±2.1 mm,平均探诊深度(PPD)为7.8±1.5 mm,平均颊退缩(REC)为2.3±1.8 mm。结果:5年后,临床附着水平(CAL)平均增加5.7±3.2 mm (p < 0.001),探测袋深度(PPD)平均减少5.1±1.6 mm (p < 0.001),退缩(REC)平均减少1.2±2.1 mm (p = 0.07) 91%的部位CAL增加≥3mm, PPD≤4mm。与基线相比,12个站点中有7个站点的REC减少≥1 mm,而3个站点保持稳定,2个站点的牙龈退缩深度分别增加了1和2 mm。结论:在本病例系列的限制下,牙周再生治疗结合辅助使用CTG对治疗深度非包容性牙周骨内缺损有效,并在五年内分别稳定或略微改善龈缘。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信