Protection of liver sinusoidal endothelial cells using different preservation solutions.

Julia Houtzager, Anne-Marieke D van Stalborch, Charlotte Hofstee, Thomas van Gulik, Jaap D van Buul
{"title":"Protection of liver sinusoidal endothelial cells using different preservation solutions.","authors":"Julia Houtzager, Anne-Marieke D van Stalborch, Charlotte Hofstee, Thomas van Gulik, Jaap D van Buul","doi":"10.1530/VB-24-0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Donor liver preservation methods and solutions have evolved over the last years. Liver sinusoidal endothelial cell (LSEC) barrier function and integrity during preservation is crucial for outcomes of liver transplantation. Therefore, the present study aimed to determine optimal preservation of LSEC barrier function and integrity, using different preservation solutions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells (HUVEC) and LSEC were incubated in either University of Wisconsin machine perfusion solution (UW-MPS), histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK), or endothelial cell growth medium 2 (EGM2) (as a golden standard for cell culturing). Endothelial integrity was assessed by measurement of cellular morphology and expression of membrane proteins ; PECAM-1, ICAM-1, and Fc-gamma receptor CD32b (FcΥRCD32b). Endothelial barrier function was measured by electric cell-substrate impedance sensing (ECIS). Cellular respondence to inflammatory stimuli with tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), was tested by studying trans-endothelial migration (TEM) under flow conditions. Differences in these parameters were analyzed between the different preservation solutions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PECAM-1 expression was high for all preservation solutions in HUVEC and LSEC. ICAM-1 expression was increased in both LSEC and HUVEC in all preservation solutions plus TNF-α. UW reduced PECAM-1 expression, whereas EGM2 medium promoted barrier function in LSEC and HUVEC, and monolayer recovery after wounding was best achieved in cells incubated in EGM2. LSEC and HUVEC incubated with EGM2 plus TNF-α both supported neutrophil adhesion and TEM, but much less to none when incubated in UW plus TNF-α.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, EGM2 showed the best results in preserving endothelial barrier function for both HUVEC and LSEC.</p>","PeriodicalId":75294,"journal":{"name":"Vascular biology (Bristol, England)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular biology (Bristol, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1530/VB-24-0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Donor liver preservation methods and solutions have evolved over the last years. Liver sinusoidal endothelial cell (LSEC) barrier function and integrity during preservation is crucial for outcomes of liver transplantation. Therefore, the present study aimed to determine optimal preservation of LSEC barrier function and integrity, using different preservation solutions.

Methods: Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells (HUVEC) and LSEC were incubated in either University of Wisconsin machine perfusion solution (UW-MPS), histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK), or endothelial cell growth medium 2 (EGM2) (as a golden standard for cell culturing). Endothelial integrity was assessed by measurement of cellular morphology and expression of membrane proteins ; PECAM-1, ICAM-1, and Fc-gamma receptor CD32b (FcΥRCD32b). Endothelial barrier function was measured by electric cell-substrate impedance sensing (ECIS). Cellular respondence to inflammatory stimuli with tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), was tested by studying trans-endothelial migration (TEM) under flow conditions. Differences in these parameters were analyzed between the different preservation solutions.

Results: PECAM-1 expression was high for all preservation solutions in HUVEC and LSEC. ICAM-1 expression was increased in both LSEC and HUVEC in all preservation solutions plus TNF-α. UW reduced PECAM-1 expression, whereas EGM2 medium promoted barrier function in LSEC and HUVEC, and monolayer recovery after wounding was best achieved in cells incubated in EGM2. LSEC and HUVEC incubated with EGM2 plus TNF-α both supported neutrophil adhesion and TEM, but much less to none when incubated in UW plus TNF-α.

Conclusions: Overall, EGM2 showed the best results in preserving endothelial barrier function for both HUVEC and LSEC.

不同保存液对肝窦内皮细胞的保护作用。
目的:近年来,供肝保存方法和解决方案不断发展。肝窦内皮细胞(LSEC)屏障功能和保存过程中的完整性对肝移植的预后至关重要。因此,本研究旨在通过使用不同的保存溶液来确定LSEC屏障功能和完整性的最佳保存。方法:人脐静脉内皮细胞(HUVEC)和LSEC分别在威斯康星大学机器灌注液(UW-MPS)、组氨酸-色氨酸-酮戊二酸盐(HTK)或内皮细胞生长培养基2 (EGM2)中孵育(EGM2是细胞培养的黄金标准)。通过测量细胞形态和膜蛋白的表达来评估内皮的完整性;PECAM-1, ICAM-1和fc - γ受体CD32b (FcΥRCD32b)。内皮屏障功能通过电-基质阻抗传感(ECIS)测量。通过研究血流条件下的跨内皮迁移(TEM)来检测细胞对肿瘤坏死因子-α (TNF-α)炎症刺激的反应。分析了不同保存溶液对这些参数的影响。结果:PECAM-1在HUVEC和LSEC的所有保存液中表达均较高。在所有保存液中加入TNF-α后,LSEC和HUVEC中ICAM-1的表达均升高。UW降低了PECAM-1的表达,而EGM2培养基促进了LSEC和HUVEC的屏障功能,EGM2培养的细胞损伤后单层恢复效果最好。EGM2 + TNF-α培养的LSEC和HUVEC均支持中性粒细胞粘附和TEM,而UW + TNF-α培养的LSEC和HUVEC则支持中性粒细胞粘附和TEM。结论:总体而言,EGM2在保护HUVEC和LSEC的内皮屏障功能方面效果最好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信