David Ferreira, António Cruz, Ana Vilela, Joana Azevedo, André Santos Moreira, João Pereira, Paulo Gil Ribeiro, Nuno Oliveira, Pedro Varanda, Bruno Direito-Santos
{"title":"Thoracolumbar fractures: Factors predicting failure of percutaneous short- and long-segment posterior fixation.","authors":"David Ferreira, António Cruz, Ana Vilela, Joana Azevedo, André Santos Moreira, João Pereira, Paulo Gil Ribeiro, Nuno Oliveira, Pedro Varanda, Bruno Direito-Santos","doi":"10.1016/j.bas.2024.104151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Thoracolumbar (TL) transition trauma is frequent and challenging. Although short- (SSPF) and long-segment posterior fixation (LSPF) are its mainstay treatment, little is known about their failure rates and reasons behind it.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>understand why TL instrumentations fail and what factors influence it.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Retrospective, cohort, unicentric analysis on adult patients with acute TL trauma treated with percutaneous transpedicular SSPF or LSPF. Two groups were created, according to the presence of treatment failure at follow-up. We analyzed whether age ≥65 years old, fracture segment, posterior ligamentous complex (PLC) injury, load sharing classification (LSC) score >6, type of instrumentation (SSPF vs LSPF) and abnormal bone mineral density (BMD) were associated with failure. To achieve this, we evaluated radiological parameters at the preoperative, postoperative and follow-up appointments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>87 patients were included: 60 (69.0%) without failure and 27 (31.0%) with. Age ≥65 years old (aOR = 3.66, <i>p</i> = 0.020), PLC injury (aOR = 2.94, <i>p</i> = 0.048) and SSPF (aOR = 6.75, <i>p</i> = 0.013) were statistically significant factors contributing to failure. The first two also presented shorter times to failure (35.2 vs 69.1 months, <i>p</i> = 0.013, and 25.2 vs 69.1 months, <i>p</i> = 0.037, respectively). In PLC injured patients, there was no statistically significant difference between SSPF vs LSPF.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusions: </strong>We conclude that age >65 years old, PLC injury and SSPF may be correlated with instrumentation failure. The first two factors were also associated with a shorter time to failure.</p>","PeriodicalId":72443,"journal":{"name":"Brain & spine","volume":"5 ","pages":"104151"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11732061/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain & spine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bas.2024.104151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Thoracolumbar (TL) transition trauma is frequent and challenging. Although short- (SSPF) and long-segment posterior fixation (LSPF) are its mainstay treatment, little is known about their failure rates and reasons behind it.
Research question: understand why TL instrumentations fail and what factors influence it.
Materials and methods: Retrospective, cohort, unicentric analysis on adult patients with acute TL trauma treated with percutaneous transpedicular SSPF or LSPF. Two groups were created, according to the presence of treatment failure at follow-up. We analyzed whether age ≥65 years old, fracture segment, posterior ligamentous complex (PLC) injury, load sharing classification (LSC) score >6, type of instrumentation (SSPF vs LSPF) and abnormal bone mineral density (BMD) were associated with failure. To achieve this, we evaluated radiological parameters at the preoperative, postoperative and follow-up appointments.
Results: 87 patients were included: 60 (69.0%) without failure and 27 (31.0%) with. Age ≥65 years old (aOR = 3.66, p = 0.020), PLC injury (aOR = 2.94, p = 0.048) and SSPF (aOR = 6.75, p = 0.013) were statistically significant factors contributing to failure. The first two also presented shorter times to failure (35.2 vs 69.1 months, p = 0.013, and 25.2 vs 69.1 months, p = 0.037, respectively). In PLC injured patients, there was no statistically significant difference between SSPF vs LSPF.
Discussion and conclusions: We conclude that age >65 years old, PLC injury and SSPF may be correlated with instrumentation failure. The first two factors were also associated with a shorter time to failure.
胸腰椎(TL)过渡创伤是常见且具有挑战性的。虽然短节段后路固定(SSPF)和长节段后路固定(LSPF)是其主要治疗方法,但对其失败率及其背后的原因知之甚少。研究问题:了解TL仪器失败的原因和影响因素。材料与方法:回顾性、队列、单中心分析经皮经椎弓根SSPF或LSPF治疗成年急性TL外伤患者。根据治疗失败的情况分为两组。我们分析了年龄≥65岁、骨折段、后韧带复合体(PLC)损伤、负荷分担分类(LSC)评分>.6、内固定类型(ssspf vs LSPF)和异常骨密度(BMD)是否与失败相关。为了达到这个目的,我们评估了术前、术后和随访时的放射学参数。结果:87例患者中,60例(69.0%)无失败,27例(31.0%)有失败。年龄≥65岁(aOR = 3.66, p = 0.020)、PLC损伤(aOR = 2.94, p = 0.048)、SSPF (aOR = 6.75, p = 0.013)是导致手术失败的有统计学意义的因素。前两组的失败时间也较短(分别为35.2 vs 69.1个月,p = 0.013和25.2 vs 69.1个月,p = 0.037)。在PLC损伤患者中,SSPF与LSPF差异无统计学意义。讨论和结论:我们得出的结论是,年龄bb ~ 65岁,PLC损伤和SSPF可能与器械失效有关。前两个因素也与较短的失败时间有关。