High alert medications off the radar: A systematic review

IF 1.8 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Michelle Santos Menezes, Fernanda Valença-Feitosa, Aline Santana Góes, Millena Rakel dos Santos, Laila Santana Silva, Sylmara Nayara Pereira dos Santos, Divaldo Pereira de Lyra Jr, Alfredo Dias de Oliveira Filho
{"title":"High alert medications off the radar: A systematic review","authors":"Michelle Santos Menezes,&nbsp;Fernanda Valença-Feitosa,&nbsp;Aline Santana Góes,&nbsp;Millena Rakel dos Santos,&nbsp;Laila Santana Silva,&nbsp;Sylmara Nayara Pereira dos Santos,&nbsp;Divaldo Pereira de Lyra Jr,&nbsp;Alfredo Dias de Oliveira Filho","doi":"10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To identify new drugs that present an increased risk of causing significant damage to critically ill patients due to failure in the administration process.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>The systematic literature review was conducted in the PubMed, Lilacs, Scopus, Web of Science and gray literature. The year in which the study was conducted was not restricted.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The initial search in the databases identified 1477 studies. Fifty manuscripts were selected for evaluation of the full text, at the end of which seven articles were included in this systematic review. As for the characteristic of medication errors, the highest frequency occurred in the administration and prescription phases. In all included studies, incidents with drugs that led to damage were observed. The drugs that are not included in the official lists as High Alert Medications (HAM) that presented an increased risk of causing damage due to medication errors found were: risperidone and piperacycline + tazobactan, in addition to the Infectious Agent class.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The results revealed that in fact there are drugs not listed as HAM that, when used in errors, promote greater risks of generating damage in critically ill patients. These described drugs should be considered for inclusion in future official lists of HAM.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73003,"journal":{"name":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100551"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11731267/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667276624001483","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To identify new drugs that present an increased risk of causing significant damage to critically ill patients due to failure in the administration process.

Method

The systematic literature review was conducted in the PubMed, Lilacs, Scopus, Web of Science and gray literature. The year in which the study was conducted was not restricted.

Results

The initial search in the databases identified 1477 studies. Fifty manuscripts were selected for evaluation of the full text, at the end of which seven articles were included in this systematic review. As for the characteristic of medication errors, the highest frequency occurred in the administration and prescription phases. In all included studies, incidents with drugs that led to damage were observed. The drugs that are not included in the official lists as High Alert Medications (HAM) that presented an increased risk of causing damage due to medication errors found were: risperidone and piperacycline + tazobactan, in addition to the Infectious Agent class.

Conclusion

The results revealed that in fact there are drugs not listed as HAM that, when used in errors, promote greater risks of generating damage in critically ill patients. These described drugs should be considered for inclusion in future official lists of HAM.
雷达上的高警戒药物:系统回顾。
目的:识别由于给药过程失败而增加对危重患者造成重大损害风险的新药。方法:系统查阅PubMed、Lilacs、Scopus、Web of Science和灰色文献。研究进行的年份没有限制。结果:最初在数据库中检索到1477项研究。选择50篇稿件进行全文评估,最后将7篇文章纳入本系统综述。用药差错发生的特点以给药期和处方期发生率最高。在所有纳入的研究中,都观察到药物导致损伤的事件。未列入官方高度警戒药物清单(HAM)的药物,由于药物错误而导致损害风险增加的药物包括:利培酮和哌环素+他唑巴坦,以及感染剂类别。结论:结果表明,事实上存在未列入HAM的药物,当错误使用时,会增加对危重患者造成损害的风险。应考虑将这些描述的药物列入未来的官方有害物质清单。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
103 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信