Determining Filipinos’ Preferences for Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests: Insights From a Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis

Austin Crochetiere MD , Marie Lauzon MS , Antwon Chaplin BA , Christopher V. Almario MD, MSHPM
{"title":"Determining Filipinos’ Preferences for Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests: Insights From a Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis","authors":"Austin Crochetiere MD ,&nbsp;Marie Lauzon MS ,&nbsp;Antwon Chaplin BA ,&nbsp;Christopher V. Almario MD, MSHPM","doi":"10.1016/j.focus.2024.100300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Filipinos in the U.S. have worse colorectal cancer screening rates and outcomes than non-Hispanic Whites, despite 85% of Filipinos being proficient in English and having insurance rates, education, and incomes that exceed those of the general population. To begin to address this disparity, the authors used conjoint analysis—a method that assesses complex decision making—to better understand Filipinos’ preferences for the different colorectal cancer screening test options.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The authors conducted a conjoint analysis survey among unscreened Filipinos aged ≥40 years at average risk for colorectal cancer to determine the relative importance of screening test attributes in their decision making (e.g., modality, effectiveness at reducing colorectal cancer risk, bowel prep). The authors also performed simulations to estimate the proportion of people who would prefer to do an annual fecal immunochemical test or colonoscopy every 10 years for their screening.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall, 105 Filipinos completed the survey; most respondents were female (74.3%) and aged 40–49 years (84.8%). The authors observed that test modality was the most important factor in respondents’ decision making. After conducting simulations using the conjoint analysis data, the authors noted that 70 (66.7%) Filipinos preferred to do an annual fecal immunochemical test for their screening, whereas 35 (33.3%) wanted to do a colonoscopy every 10 years.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The authors found that 2 in 3 Filipinos prefer fecal immunochemical test to colonoscopy for their colorectal cancer screening. To address colorectal cancer disparities in the Filipino community, investigators, health systems, public health agencies, and community organizations need to develop culturally tailored, sustainable interventions, and such programs may want to focus on improving education on and access to fecal immunochemical test.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72142,"journal":{"name":"AJPM focus","volume":"4 1","pages":"Article 100300"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11731454/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJPM focus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773065424001184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Filipinos in the U.S. have worse colorectal cancer screening rates and outcomes than non-Hispanic Whites, despite 85% of Filipinos being proficient in English and having insurance rates, education, and incomes that exceed those of the general population. To begin to address this disparity, the authors used conjoint analysis—a method that assesses complex decision making—to better understand Filipinos’ preferences for the different colorectal cancer screening test options.

Methods

The authors conducted a conjoint analysis survey among unscreened Filipinos aged ≥40 years at average risk for colorectal cancer to determine the relative importance of screening test attributes in their decision making (e.g., modality, effectiveness at reducing colorectal cancer risk, bowel prep). The authors also performed simulations to estimate the proportion of people who would prefer to do an annual fecal immunochemical test or colonoscopy every 10 years for their screening.

Results

Overall, 105 Filipinos completed the survey; most respondents were female (74.3%) and aged 40–49 years (84.8%). The authors observed that test modality was the most important factor in respondents’ decision making. After conducting simulations using the conjoint analysis data, the authors noted that 70 (66.7%) Filipinos preferred to do an annual fecal immunochemical test for their screening, whereas 35 (33.3%) wanted to do a colonoscopy every 10 years.

Conclusions

The authors found that 2 in 3 Filipinos prefer fecal immunochemical test to colonoscopy for their colorectal cancer screening. To address colorectal cancer disparities in the Filipino community, investigators, health systems, public health agencies, and community organizations need to develop culturally tailored, sustainable interventions, and such programs may want to focus on improving education on and access to fecal immunochemical test.
确定菲律宾人对结直肠癌筛查试验的偏好:基于选择的联合分析的见解。
导言:在美国,菲律宾人的结直肠癌筛查率和结果均低于非西班牙裔白人,尽管85%的菲律宾人精通英语,其保险率、教育程度和收入均高于普通人。为了着手解决这一差距,作者采用了联合分析--一种评估复杂决策的方法--来更好地了解菲律宾人对不同结直肠癌筛查试验选项的偏好:作者对年龄≥40 岁、平均罹患大肠癌风险未接受筛查的菲律宾人进行了联合分析调查,以确定筛查检验属性在其决策中的相对重要性(如方式、降低大肠癌风险的有效性、肠道准备)。作者还进行了模拟实验,以估计愿意每年进行一次粪便免疫化学检验或每十年进行一次结肠镜检查的筛查人群比例:共有 105 名菲律宾人完成了调查;大多数受访者为女性(74.3%),年龄在 40-49 岁之间(84.8%)。作者发现,检查方式是受访者做出决定的最重要因素。在利用联合分析数据进行模拟后,作者注意到 70 名菲律宾人(66.7%)倾向于每年进行一次粪便免疫化学检验筛查,而 35 名菲律宾人(33.3%)希望每 10 年进行一次结肠镜检查:作者发现,每 3 名菲律宾人中就有 2 人喜欢用粪便免疫化学检验来筛查大肠癌,而不是结肠镜检查。为了解决菲律宾社区结直肠癌的不平等问题,调查人员、医疗系统、公共卫生机构和社区组织需要制定符合当地文化的、可持续的干预措施,这些计划可能需要重点加强粪便免疫化学检验的教育和普及。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AJPM focus
AJPM focus Health, Public Health and Health Policy
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信