Posterior Nasal Nerve Neurolysis in Addition to Radiofrequency Ablation of the Inferior Turbinates for Patients with Chronic Rhinitis.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Chien-Yu Huang, Jyun-Yi Liao, Han-Lo Teng, Bor-Hwang Kang, Yaoh-Shiang Lin, Jun-Wei Hsieh
{"title":"Posterior Nasal Nerve Neurolysis in Addition to Radiofrequency Ablation of the Inferior Turbinates for Patients with Chronic Rhinitis.","authors":"Chien-Yu Huang, Jyun-Yi Liao, Han-Lo Teng, Bor-Hwang Kang, Yaoh-Shiang Lin, Jun-Wei Hsieh","doi":"10.1159/000543366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the outcome of radiofrequency ablation of the inferior turbinates (RFITs) combined with posterior nasal nerve neurolysis (RPN3) in comparison with RFIT alone in the treatment of patients with chronic rhinitis unresponsive to pharmacological therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted on adult and adolescent patients with chronic rhinitis who demonstrated a poor response to medication. Patients with a total 24-h reflective total nasal symptom score (rTNSS) of ≥5, rhinorrhea score of ≥2, and congestion score of ≥2 were included. The treatment outcomes of patients who underwent RPN3 and RFIT alone were assessed. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in 24-h rTNSS, Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scores, and the response rate defined as rTNSS improved by ≧30% during follow-ups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 64 patients were included (45 males, 70.3%). Overall, 49 patients underwent RPN3, and 15 patients underwent RFIT alone. The rTNSS had improved by 78.4% and 65.8% in RPN3 and RFIT groups, respectively (both p < 0.001). The NOSE score had improved by 92.89% and 86.81% in the RPN3 and RFIT groups (both p < 0.001), respectively. Patients in the RPN3 group demonstrated statistically significantly better results after 3 months than patients in the RFIT alone group (p < 0.05). The response rate was 98% in the RPN3 group after 3 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proposed RPN3 alleviated rhinitis symptoms, which demonstrated a high response rate with a superior symptom control rate than RFIT alone in chronic rhinitis with severe rhinorrhea and nasal congestion cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":49717,"journal":{"name":"Orl-Journal for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Head and Neck Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"191-199"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orl-Journal for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000543366","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate the outcome of radiofrequency ablation of the inferior turbinates (RFITs) combined with posterior nasal nerve neurolysis (RPN3) in comparison with RFIT alone in the treatment of patients with chronic rhinitis unresponsive to pharmacological therapy.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on adult and adolescent patients with chronic rhinitis who demonstrated a poor response to medication. Patients with a total 24-h reflective total nasal symptom score (rTNSS) of ≥5, rhinorrhea score of ≥2, and congestion score of ≥2 were included. The treatment outcomes of patients who underwent RPN3 and RFIT alone were assessed. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in 24-h rTNSS, Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scores, and the response rate defined as rTNSS improved by ≧30% during follow-ups.

Results: A total of 64 patients were included (45 males, 70.3%). Overall, 49 patients underwent RPN3, and 15 patients underwent RFIT alone. The rTNSS had improved by 78.4% and 65.8% in RPN3 and RFIT groups, respectively (both p < 0.001). The NOSE score had improved by 92.89% and 86.81% in the RPN3 and RFIT groups (both p < 0.001), respectively. Patients in the RPN3 group demonstrated statistically significantly better results after 3 months than patients in the RFIT alone group (p < 0.05). The response rate was 98% in the RPN3 group after 3 months.

Conclusions: The proposed RPN3 alleviated rhinitis symptoms, which demonstrated a high response rate with a superior symptom control rate than RFIT alone in chronic rhinitis with severe rhinorrhea and nasal congestion cases.

下鼻甲射频消融加鼻后神经松解术治疗慢性鼻炎。
简介:本研究旨在评价射频消融下鼻甲(RFIT)联合鼻后神经松解术(RPN3)与RFIT单独治疗对药物治疗无反应的慢性鼻炎患者的疗效。方法:回顾性队列研究进行了成人和青少年慢性鼻炎患者谁表现出不良反应的药物。纳入24小时鼻症状总反射评分≧5,鼻漏评分≧2,鼻塞评分≧2的患者。评估单独接受RPN3和RFIT的患者的治疗结果。主要终点是随访期间12 h鼻症状总评分(rTNSS)、鼻塞症状评价评分(NOSE)较基线的变化,以及rTNSS≥30%的缓解率。结果:共纳入64例患者,其中男性45例,占70.3%。总的来说,49例患者接受了RPN3, 15例患者单独接受了RFIT。rTNSS在RPN3组和RFIT组分别改善了78.4%和65.8% (p < 0.001)。rn3组和RFIT组鼻翼评分分别提高了92.89%和86.81% (p均< 0.001)。3个月后,RPN3组患者的治疗效果明显优于单独RFIT组(p < 0.05)。RPN3组3个月后的有效率为98%。结论:rn3治疗慢性鼻炎伴严重鼻溢鼻塞患者,缓解鼻炎症状,有效率高,症状控制率优于RFIT单独治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
31
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''ORL'' contains concise, original scientific papers of interest for both clinicians and researchers in oto-rhino-laryngology and head and neck surgery. Contributions drawn from the basic sciences cover new knowledge on the anatomy, pathology, pathophysiology, immunology and tumor biology of head and neck and the auditory and vestibular system, the salivary glands, paranasal sinuses and of the organs of the upper respiratory and digestive tract. The practical value of the journal is accentuated by reports of clinical progress in diagnosis and therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信