Factors Associated with Smoking Cessation of Participants in the National Lung Cancer Screening Program in Korea.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Na-Young Yoon, Minji Seo, Nayoung Lee, Yeol Kim
{"title":"Factors Associated with Smoking Cessation of Participants in the National Lung Cancer Screening Program in Korea.","authors":"Na-Young Yoon, Minji Seo, Nayoung Lee, Yeol Kim","doi":"10.4143/crt.2024.653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Smoking cessation interventions for participants in lung cancer screening are essential for increasing the effectiveness of screening to reduce lung cancer mortality. This study aimed to investigate the factors that lead to smoking cessation after lung cancer screening.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The Korean National Lung Cancer Screening (KNLCS) Satisfaction Survey was conducted from 2021 to 2022 with 1,000 samples per year among participants in KNLCS targets 30 or more pack-year smokers. Factors associated with smoking cessation were analyzed based on the survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1,525 current smokers in the survey participants, 728 (47.7%) received screening result counseling from physician after screening and showed significantly higher smoking cessation rate than non-counselling participants [OR 2.17, 95% CI 1.27-3.70]. The participants who considered the counseling helpful were more likely to quit smoking [OR 3.53, 95% CI 2.00-6.22] and to reduce smoking amount [OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.54-2.71]. Similarly, those who received physicians' active recommendations to quit smoking were likely to quit smoking [OR 2.20, 95% CI 1.25-3.87] and to decrease smoking amount [OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.00-1.68]. In contrast, participants who had no abnormal findings from screening tended to have no significant change in smoking status despite the physicians' active recommendations to quit smoking.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Physicians' active recommendations and effective counseling to quit smoking could be a key factor in increasing smoking cessation among lung cancer screening participants. Further research should be conducted to develop more effective strategies for smoking cessation to participants without abnormal findings in lung cancer screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":49094,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2024.653","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Smoking cessation interventions for participants in lung cancer screening are essential for increasing the effectiveness of screening to reduce lung cancer mortality. This study aimed to investigate the factors that lead to smoking cessation after lung cancer screening.

Materials and methods: The Korean National Lung Cancer Screening (KNLCS) Satisfaction Survey was conducted from 2021 to 2022 with 1,000 samples per year among participants in KNLCS targets 30 or more pack-year smokers. Factors associated with smoking cessation were analyzed based on the survey.

Results: Among 1,525 current smokers in the survey participants, 728 (47.7%) received screening result counseling from physician after screening and showed significantly higher smoking cessation rate than non-counselling participants [OR 2.17, 95% CI 1.27-3.70]. The participants who considered the counseling helpful were more likely to quit smoking [OR 3.53, 95% CI 2.00-6.22] and to reduce smoking amount [OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.54-2.71]. Similarly, those who received physicians' active recommendations to quit smoking were likely to quit smoking [OR 2.20, 95% CI 1.25-3.87] and to decrease smoking amount [OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.00-1.68]. In contrast, participants who had no abnormal findings from screening tended to have no significant change in smoking status despite the physicians' active recommendations to quit smoking.

Conclusion: Physicians' active recommendations and effective counseling to quit smoking could be a key factor in increasing smoking cessation among lung cancer screening participants. Further research should be conducted to develop more effective strategies for smoking cessation to participants without abnormal findings in lung cancer screening.

韩国国家肺癌筛查项目参与者戒烟的相关因素
目的:对肺癌筛查参与者进行戒烟干预对于提高筛查的有效性以降低肺癌死亡率至关重要。本研究旨在探讨肺癌筛查后导致戒烟的因素。材料和方法:韩国全国肺癌筛查(KNLCS)满意度调查从2021年到2022年,每年以1000个样本为对象,以30名以上的吸烟者为对象进行。根据调查结果分析与戒烟相关的因素。结果:在1525名当前吸烟者中,728名(47.7%)在筛查后接受了医生的筛查结果咨询,其戒烟率明显高于未接受咨询的参与者[OR 2.17, 95% CI 1.27-3.70]。认为咨询有帮助的参与者更有可能戒烟[OR 3.53, 95% CI 2.00-6.22]和减少吸烟量[OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.54-2.71]。同样,那些接受医生积极建议戒烟的人更有可能戒烟[OR 2.20, 95% CI 1.25-3.87]并减少吸烟量[OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.00-1.68]。相比之下,尽管医生积极建议戒烟,但在筛查中没有发现异常的参与者,其吸烟状况往往没有显著变化。结论:医师对戒烟的积极建议和有效咨询可能是肺癌筛查参与者戒烟率提高的关键因素。对于肺癌筛查中未发现异常的参与者,应开展进一步的研究,以制定更有效的戒烟策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
2.20%
发文量
126
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Research and Treatment is a peer-reviewed open access publication of the Korean Cancer Association. It is published quarterly, one volume per year. Abbreviated title is Cancer Res Treat. It accepts manuscripts relevant to experimental and clinical cancer research. Subjects include carcinogenesis, tumor biology, molecular oncology, cancer genetics, tumor immunology, epidemiology, predictive markers and cancer prevention, pathology, cancer diagnosis, screening and therapies including chemotherapy, surgery, radiation therapy, immunotherapy, gene therapy, multimodality treatment and palliative care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信