Evaluating the Impact of Changes in AI-derived Case Scores over Time on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Outcomes.

IF 8.1 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Samantha P Zuckerman, Senthil Periaswamy, Julie L Shisler, Ameena Elahi, Christine E Edmonds, Jeffrey Hoffmeister, Emily F Conant
{"title":"Evaluating the Impact of Changes in AI-derived Case Scores over Time on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Outcomes.","authors":"Samantha P Zuckerman, Senthil Periaswamy, Julie L Shisler, Ameena Elahi, Christine E Edmonds, Jeffrey Hoffmeister, Emily F Conant","doi":"10.1148/ryai.230597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>\"Just Accepted\" papers have undergone full peer review and have been accepted for publication in <i>Radiology: Artificial Intelligence</i>. This article will undergo copyediting, layout, and proof review before it is published in its final version. Please note that during production of the final copyedited article, errors may be discovered which could affect the content.</i> Purpose To evaluate the change in DBT-AI (digital breast tomosynthesis-artificial intelligence) case scores over sequential screens. Materials and Methods This retrospective review included 21,108 female patients (mean age, 58.1 ± [SD] 11.5 years) with 31,741 DBT screening examinations performed at a single site from 2/3/2020 to 9/12/2022. Among 7,000 patients with two or more DBT-AI screenings, 1,799 had one year follow up and were included in the analysis. DBT-AI case scores and differences in case score over time were determined. Case scores ranged from 0-100. For each screening outcome (true positive (TP), false positive (FP), true negative (TN), false negative (FN)), mean and median case score change was calculated. Results The highest average case score was seen in TP examinations (average 75, range 7-100, <i>n</i> = 41), and the lowest average case score was seen in TN examinations (average 34, range 0-100, <i>n</i> = 1640). The largest positive case score change was seen in TP examinations (mean case score change 21.1, median case score change 17). FN examinations included mammographically occult cancers diagnosed following supplemental screening and those found on symptomatic diagnostic imaging. Differences between TP and TN mean case score change (<i>P</i> < .001) and between TP and FP mean case score change (<i>P</i> = .02) were statistically significant. Conclusion Using the combination of DBT-AI case score with change in case score over time may help radiologists make recall decisions in DBT screening. All studies with high case score and/or case score changes should be carefully scrutinized to maximize screening performance. ©RSNA, 2025.</p>","PeriodicalId":29787,"journal":{"name":"Radiology-Artificial Intelligence","volume":" ","pages":"e230597"},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology-Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1148/ryai.230597","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

"Just Accepted" papers have undergone full peer review and have been accepted for publication in Radiology: Artificial Intelligence. This article will undergo copyediting, layout, and proof review before it is published in its final version. Please note that during production of the final copyedited article, errors may be discovered which could affect the content. Purpose To evaluate the change in DBT-AI (digital breast tomosynthesis-artificial intelligence) case scores over sequential screens. Materials and Methods This retrospective review included 21,108 female patients (mean age, 58.1 ± [SD] 11.5 years) with 31,741 DBT screening examinations performed at a single site from 2/3/2020 to 9/12/2022. Among 7,000 patients with two or more DBT-AI screenings, 1,799 had one year follow up and were included in the analysis. DBT-AI case scores and differences in case score over time were determined. Case scores ranged from 0-100. For each screening outcome (true positive (TP), false positive (FP), true negative (TN), false negative (FN)), mean and median case score change was calculated. Results The highest average case score was seen in TP examinations (average 75, range 7-100, n = 41), and the lowest average case score was seen in TN examinations (average 34, range 0-100, n = 1640). The largest positive case score change was seen in TP examinations (mean case score change 21.1, median case score change 17). FN examinations included mammographically occult cancers diagnosed following supplemental screening and those found on symptomatic diagnostic imaging. Differences between TP and TN mean case score change (P < .001) and between TP and FP mean case score change (P = .02) were statistically significant. Conclusion Using the combination of DBT-AI case score with change in case score over time may help radiologists make recall decisions in DBT screening. All studies with high case score and/or case score changes should be carefully scrutinized to maximize screening performance. ©RSNA, 2025.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.20
自引率
1.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Radiology: Artificial Intelligence is a bi-monthly publication that focuses on the emerging applications of machine learning and artificial intelligence in the field of imaging across various disciplines. This journal is available online and accepts multiple manuscript types, including Original Research, Technical Developments, Data Resources, Review articles, Editorials, Letters to the Editor and Replies, Special Reports, and AI in Brief.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信