Optimizing Operating Room Efficiency for Primary Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Using Performance Benchmarks

IF 1.5 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Koorosh Kashanian BMSc , Matey Juric BSc , Tim Ramsay PhD , Pascal Fallavollita PhD , Paul E. Beaulé MD, FAAOS, FRCSC
{"title":"Optimizing Operating Room Efficiency for Primary Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Using Performance Benchmarks","authors":"Koorosh Kashanian BMSc ,&nbsp;Matey Juric BSc ,&nbsp;Tim Ramsay PhD ,&nbsp;Pascal Fallavollita PhD ,&nbsp;Paul E. Beaulé MD, FAAOS, FRCSC","doi":"10.1016/j.artd.2024.101590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>With increasing demand for total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA), maximizing operating room (OR) efficiency is critical. This paper sought to examine the implementation of time benchmarks when performing primary TKA and THA. We hypothesized that implementing benchmarks would improve efficiency and the number of joints performed per day.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Two hundred ninety-five patients from 59 OR days were reviewed. All surgeries were performed as outpatients and included 160 females and 135 males; 161 TKA and 134 THA; mean age, 66.1; mean body mass index, 28.6 kg/m<sup>2</sup>; American Society of Anesthesia, 2. Time points, demographics, and adverse events were recorded. Benchmarks to complete 4 joints in 8 h were: anesthesia preparation time (APT) of &lt;11 min, procedure time of &lt;72 min, anesthesia finish time (AFT) of &lt;21 min, and turnover of &lt;22 min.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The percentage of cases meeting individual benchmarks for APT was 50.17%; procedure time was 95.25%; AFT was 99.67%; turnover was 65.25%. The means were: APT 11:00 min, Surgical Prep Time 9:00 min, procedure time 55:00 min, AFT 3:00 min, and turnover 19:00 min. Overall, 98.3% (58/59) of ORs had 4 cases completed within 8 h and 52.5% (31/59) had 5 cases within 8 h. Age, body mass index, and consecutive laterality of surgery were determined to affect the likelihood of meeting benchmarks for case time, APT, and turnover.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Establishing time benchmarks permitted the introduction of 5 joint days within an 8-h OR without increasing resource utilization. Factors that influence OR efficiency for high-volume primary hip and knee replacements were identified.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37940,"journal":{"name":"Arthroplasty Today","volume":"31 ","pages":"Article 101590"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11732218/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroplasty Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352344124002759","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

With increasing demand for total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA), maximizing operating room (OR) efficiency is critical. This paper sought to examine the implementation of time benchmarks when performing primary TKA and THA. We hypothesized that implementing benchmarks would improve efficiency and the number of joints performed per day.

Methods

Two hundred ninety-five patients from 59 OR days were reviewed. All surgeries were performed as outpatients and included 160 females and 135 males; 161 TKA and 134 THA; mean age, 66.1; mean body mass index, 28.6 kg/m2; American Society of Anesthesia, 2. Time points, demographics, and adverse events were recorded. Benchmarks to complete 4 joints in 8 h were: anesthesia preparation time (APT) of <11 min, procedure time of <72 min, anesthesia finish time (AFT) of <21 min, and turnover of <22 min.

Results

The percentage of cases meeting individual benchmarks for APT was 50.17%; procedure time was 95.25%; AFT was 99.67%; turnover was 65.25%. The means were: APT 11:00 min, Surgical Prep Time 9:00 min, procedure time 55:00 min, AFT 3:00 min, and turnover 19:00 min. Overall, 98.3% (58/59) of ORs had 4 cases completed within 8 h and 52.5% (31/59) had 5 cases within 8 h. Age, body mass index, and consecutive laterality of surgery were determined to affect the likelihood of meeting benchmarks for case time, APT, and turnover.

Conclusions

Establishing time benchmarks permitted the introduction of 5 joint days within an 8-h OR without increasing resource utilization. Factors that influence OR efficiency for high-volume primary hip and knee replacements were identified.
使用性能基准优化初级髋关节和膝关节置换术的手术室效率。
背景:随着全髋关节置换术(THA)和全膝关节置换术(TKA)需求的增加,手术室(OR)效率的最大化是至关重要的。本文试图检查执行主要TKA和THA时的时间基准的实施。我们假设实现基准将提高效率和每天执行的关节数量。方法:回顾性分析住院59天295例患者的临床资料。所有手术均为门诊患者,包括160名女性和135名男性;TKA 161个,THA 134个;平均年龄66.1岁;平均体重指数28.6 kg/m2;美国麻醉学会,2。记录时间点、人口统计数据和不良事件。8 h内完成4个关节的基准为:麻醉准备时间(APT)的结果:达到个体APT基准的病例占50.17%;手术时间为95.25%;AFT为99.67%;流动率65.25%。平均时间为:手术时间11:00 min,手术准备时间9:00 min,手术时间55:00 min,手术时间3:00 min,手术时间19:00 min。总体而言,98.3%(58/59)的手术室在8小时内完成4例,52.5%(31/59)的手术室在8小时内完成5例。确定年龄,体重指数和连续手术侧侧影响达到病例时间,APT和手术时间基准的可能性。结论:建立时间基准可以在不增加资源利用率的情况下,在8小时的手术室内引入5个联合天。确定了影响大容量原发性髋关节和膝关节置换术OR效率的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arthroplasty Today
Arthroplasty Today Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
258
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊介绍: Arthroplasty Today is a companion journal to the Journal of Arthroplasty. The journal Arthroplasty Today brings together the clinical and scientific foundations for joint replacement of the hip and knee in an open-access, online format. Arthroplasty Today solicits manuscripts of the highest quality from all areas of scientific endeavor that relate to joint replacement or the treatment of its complications, including those dealing with patient outcomes, economic and policy issues, prosthetic design, biomechanics, biomaterials, and biologic response to arthroplasty. The journal focuses on case reports. It is the purpose of Arthroplasty Today to present material to practicing orthopaedic surgeons that will keep them abreast of developments in the field, prove useful in the care of patients, and aid in understanding the scientific foundation of this subspecialty area of joint replacement. The international members of the Editorial Board provide a worldwide perspective for the journal''s area of interest. Their participation ensures that each issue of Arthroplasty Today provides the reader with timely, peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信